← 返回前沿论文

三阴性乳腺癌的快速复发:临床模式、铂类耐药及其对克隆演化的意义

英文原题:Rapid relapse in triple-negative breast cancer: clinical patterns, platinum resistance, and implications for clonal evolution.

PubMed 2026/07/10(内容时间) Front Pharmacol Q1 · IF 5.4(JCR 2025)

研究概要

rrTNBC代表一种独特的、高度侵袭性的表型,倾向于内脏和脑转移,对常规铂类挽救治疗反应不佳。这些发现与rrTNBC内侵袭性克隆演化一致,并凸显出迫切需要在这一点高风险人群中前瞻性评估新型治疗策略。

研究思路结论见上方概要

三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)具有高度异质性和预后差的特点。其中一种特别具有侵袭性的亚型被称为“快速复发”TNBC(rrTNBC),定义为诊断后24个月内发生远处转移或死亡。了解rrTNBC独特的复发模式及预后决定因素,对于揭示肿瘤演变规律和优化治疗策略至关重要。本研究旨在阐明rrTNBC与缓慢复发TNBC(srTNBC)相比的临床病理特征、复发模式及预后结局。

我们回顾性分析了在天津医科大学肿瘤医院接受治疗的638例复发或转移性TNBC术后患者。患者被分为rrTNBC(复发≤24个月,n = 478)和srTNBC(复发>24个月,n = 160)。比较了两组的临床病理变量、复发部位和生存结局,包括无病生存期(DFS)、首次挽救治疗后的无进展间期(PFI)、复发后生存期(PRS)和总生存期(OS)。

与srTNBC相比,rrTNBC与更高的TNM分期、T分期、N分期以及更低的基质TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)表达比例相关(均p < 0.001)。在复发模式方面,rrTNBC患者更易以内脏转移(74.90% vs. 22.50%,p < 0.001)和脑转移(10.88% vs. 0.62%,p < 0.001)作为首次事件,而srTNBC患者首次复发于胸壁或区域淋巴结的发生率更高(90.00% vs. 62.13%,p < 0.001)。因此,rrTNBC的特征是首次复发时直接远处转移率显著更高(93.10% vs. 28.12%,p < 0.001)。在预后方面,与srTNBC患者相比,rrTNBC患者在所有指标上均表现出明显更差的结局,包括中位无病生存期(13.4 vs. 26.6个月)、一线挽救治疗后的中位PFI(2.27 vs. 8.43个月)、中位PRS(12.1 vs. 23.5个月)和中位总生存期(26.5 vs. 52.0个月)(均p < 0.001)。在铂类一线挽救治疗亚组(n = 369)中,与srTNBC患者(n = 102)相比,rrTNBC患者(n = 267)始终表现出显著更短的DFS、PFI、PRS和OS(均p < 0.001)。

展开英文摘要原文

BACKGROUND: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by high heterogeneity and poor prognosis. A particularly aggressive subset, termed 'rapid relapse' TNBC (rrTNBC), is defined by distant metastasis or death within 24 months of diagnosis. Understanding the unique recurrence patterns and prognostic determinants of rrTNBC is crucial for deciphering tumor evolution and optimizing therapeutic strategies. This study aims to delineate the clinicopathological features, recurrence patterns, and prognostic outcomes of rrTNBC compared to slow relapse TNBC (srTNBC). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 638 postoperative patients with recurrent or metastatic TNBC treated at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital. Patients were categorized into rrTNBC (relapse ≤24 months, n = 478) and srTNBC (relapse >24 months, n = 160). Clinicopathological variables, recurrence sites, and survival outcomes, including disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free interval (PFI) after first salvage therapy, post-recurrence survival (PRS), and overall survival (OS), were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Compared to srTNBC, rrTNBC was associated with higher TNM stage, T stage, N stage, and a lower proportion of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte expression (all p < 0.001). Regarding recurrence patterns, rrTNBC patients were more likely to present with visceral (74.90% vs. 22.50%, p < 0.001) and brain metastases (10.88% vs. 0.62%, p < 0.001) as the first event, whereas srTNBC patients had a higher incidence of first relapse in the chest wall or regional lymph nodes (90.00% vs. 62.13%, p < 0.001). Consequently, rrTNBC was characterized by a significantly higher rate of direct distant metastasis at first recurrence (93.10% vs. 28.12%, p < 0.001). Prognostically, rrTNBC patients had markedly worse outcomes across all metrics compared to srTNBC patients, including median disease-free survival (13.4 vs. 26.6 months), median PFI after first-line salvage therapy (2.27 vs. 8.43 months), median PRS (12.1 vs. 23.5 months), and median overall survival (26.5 vs. 52.0 months) (all p < 0.001). In the platinum-based first-line salvage therapy subgroup (n = 369), rrTNBC patients (n = 267) consistently demonstrated significantly shorter DFS, PFI, PRS, and OS compared to srTNBC patients (n = 102) (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: rrTNBC represents a distinct, highly aggressive phenotype with a predilection for visceral and brain metastasis and a dismal response to conventional platinum-based salvage therapy. These findings are consistent with the aggressive clonal evolution within rrTNBC and highlight an urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies to be prospectively evaluated in this high-risk population.

论文信息

作者
Ma T、Cai SL、Chen HD、Zhang J
单位
The Third Department of Breast Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute &amp; Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.China
期刊
Frontiers in pharmacology2026
原文标识
PubMed 42499497 · DOI 10.3389/fphar.2026.1889398