CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation, Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy, or Combined Consolidation for Relapsed/Refractive Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma in Reachieved Complete Remission: An Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting-Adjusted Comparative Study.
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation, Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy, or Combined Consolidation for Relapsed/Refractive Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma in Reachieved Complete Remission: An Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting-Adjusted Comparative Study.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
CAR-T 细胞疗法已成为治疗复发/难治性(R/R)原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤(PCNSL)的一种有前景的策略。尽管近期报道提示,自体干细胞移植(ASCT)联合CAR-T 疗法可能较CAR-T 单药治疗具有更优疗效,但针对达到完全缓解(CR)患者,直接比较这些方案与常规ASCT作为巩固治疗的证据仍然匮乏。
本研究旨在评估并比较3种巩固策略——ASCT、CAR-T 单药治疗以及ASCT联合CAR-T 治疗(ASCT+CAR-T)——在再次达到CR的R/R PCNSL患者中的临床疗效和生存结局。本回顾性研究分析了2022年4月至2025年11月期间在北京高博医院接受巩固治疗的112例R/R PCNSL患者。接受CAR-T 治疗的患者纳入临床试验(ChiCTR2200058972)。队列的中位年龄为57岁(范围,25至75岁)。14例患者(12.5%)既往接受过超过3线治疗,23.2%的队列患者国际结外淋巴瘤研究组(IESLG)评分为3。在巩固治疗方面,38例患者接受CAR-T 治疗,42例接受ASCT,32例接受ASCT+CAR-T 联合治疗。在中位随访21.4个月时,总体2年无进展生存期(PFS)率和总生存期(OS)率分别为70.7%和82.5%。
在稳定逆概率治疗加权调整分析中,ASCT组相比CAR-T 组(亚分布风险比[sHR],0.236;P = .034)和ASCT+CAR-T 组(sHR,0.121;P = .009)显示出显著更低的累积复发发生率。虽然ASCT在延长PFS方面较CAR-T 治疗显示出有利趋势(风险比,0.384;P = .072),但在3个队列中,OS或3个月完全缓解率均未观察到显著差异。安全性可控。最常见的死亡原因是疾病进展(58.8%)和感染(41.2%)。对于成功再次达到CR的R/R PCNSL患者,与CAR-T 单药治疗或ASCT+CAR-T 治疗相比,ASCT单药治疗与更低的累积复发率相关。鉴于本研究的回顾性性质及潜在的残余混杂,这些发现需要进一步的前瞻性验证。
Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy has emerged as a promising strategy for treating relapsed or refractory (R/R) primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). While recent reports suggest that combined autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and CAR-T therapy may offer superior efficacy over CAR-T monotherapy, direct comparative evidence evaluating these modalities against conventional ASCT as consolidation therapy for patients in complete remission (CR) remains scarce.
This study was conducted to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy and survival outcomes of 3 consolidation strategies-ASCT, CAR-T monotherapy, and ASCT combined with CAR-T therapy (ASCT+CAR-T)-in R/R PCNSL patients who reachieved CR. This retrospective study analyzed 112 patients with R/R PCNSL who received consolidation therapy at Beijing GoBroad Hospital between April 2022 and November 2025. CAR-T therapy recipients were enrolled in the clinical trial (ChiCTR2200058972). The median age of the cohort was 57 years (range, 25 to 75 years). Fourteen patients (12. 5%) had received more than 3 prior lines of therapy, and 23. 2% of the cohort presented with an International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group (IESLG) score 3. For consolidation, 38 patients received CAR-T therapy, 42 underwent ASCT, and 32 received combined ASCT+CAR-T therapy. At a median follow-up of 21. 4 months, the overall 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 70.
7% and 82. 5%, respectively. In the stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted analysis, the ASCT group demonstrated a significantly lower cumulative incidence of relapse compared to the CAR-T group (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 0. 236; P = . 034) and the ASCT+CAR-T group (sHR, 0. 121; P = . 009). While ASCT showed a favorable trend in prolonging PFS over CAR-T therapy (hazard ratio, 0. 384; P = . 072), no significant differences were observed in OS or 3-month complete response rate across the 3 cohorts.
Safety was manageable. The most common causes of death were disease progression (58. 8%) and infection (41. 2%). For R/R PCNSL patients who successfully reachieved CR, ASCT monotherapy was associated with a lower cumulative incidence of relapse compared with CAR-T monotherapy or ASCT+CAR-T therapy. Given the retrospective nature of this study and potential residual confounding, these findings require further prospective validation.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。