← 返回前沿论文

基于重复时间-事件模型的 Epcoritamab 剂量递增方案选择与优化以降低细胞因子释放综合征风险

英文原题:Epcoritamab Step-Up Dosing Regimen Selection and Optimization Using Repeated Time-to-Event Modeling for Cytokine Release Syndrome Risk Mitigation.

查看英文原题

Epcoritamab Step-Up Dosing Regimen Selection and Optimization Using Repeated Time-to-Event Modeling for Cytokine Release Syndrome Risk Mitigation.

PubMed 2026/07/07(内容时间) Clin Pharmacol Ther Q1 · IF 4.9(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

Epcoritamab是一种CD3×CD20 T细胞接合双特异性抗体,已获批用于至少接受过两线全身治疗后的多种复发/难治性(R/R)大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)和复发/难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)。

本研究开发并校准重复事件时间模型,以评估优化阶梯递增剂量(SUD)方案的影响,以及静脉补液和/或皮质类固醇对细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)风险的作用。分析数据来自EPCORE NHL-1和EPCORE NHL-3研究(NCT03625037、NCT04542824)中接受28天周期皮下注射epcoritamab的600例侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤(aNHL)和惰性非霍奇金淋巴瘤(iNHL)患者。校准模型显示,既往CAR-T 细胞治疗(125/600例,占20.8%)与epcoritamab对2级CRS风险的最大刺激效应降低69.7%相关(95%置信区间[CI]:38.2–85.2)。第1周期(C1)静脉补液或地塞米松与epcoritamab最大半效血浆刺激浓度(S50)升高2.89倍相关(95% CI:1.57–5.30)。

此外,C1预防性使用静脉补液和地塞米松与S50升高3.79倍相关(95% CI:1.65–8.73)。模拟显示,与泼尼松相比,地塞米松进一步降低aNHL/iNHL患者2级CRS风险;iNHL患者采用三步SUD方案可进一步降低CRS风险。

总体而言,模型显示,R/R LBCL获批的两步SUD方案及R/R FL获批的三步SUD方案,联合静脉补液和地塞米松预防,足以降低2级CRS风险。

展开英文摘要原文

Epcoritamab is a CD3 CD20 T-cell-engaging bispecific antibody approved for the treatment of various types of relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) and R/R follicular lymphoma (FL), after at least two lines of systemic therapy.

Here, we develop and calibrate repeated time-to-event models to assess the impact of optimized step-up dosing (SUD) regimens and the effect of intravenous fluids and/or corticosteroids on cytokine release syndrome (CRS) risk. The analysis used pooled data from 600 patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (aNHL) and indolent NHL (iNHL) who received subcutaneous epcoritamab in 28-day cycles in the EPCORE NHL-1 and EPCORE NHL-3 studies (NCT03625037, NCT04542824).

In the calibrated model, prior CAR T cell therapy (125/600 patients [20. 8%]) was associated with a 69. 7% reduction (95% confidence interval [CI], 38. 2-85. 2) in the maximum stimulatory effect of epcoritamab on the hazard of Grade 2 CRS. Intravenous fluids or dexamethasone during Cycle (C)1 were associated with a 2. 89-fold (95% CI, 1. 57-5. 30) increase in the half-maximal effective plasma concentration of epcoritamab on stimulation (S50).

Furthermore, prophylaxis with intravenous fluids and dexamethasone during C1 was associated with a 3. 79-fold (95% CI, 1. 65-8. 73) increase in S50. Simulations show that the use of dexamethasone further reduces Grade 2 CRS risk compared with prednisone in patients with aNHL/iNHL.

Moreover, a 3-SUD design further reduces CRS risk in patients with iNHL.

Overall, our models showed that the approved 2-SUD regimen for R/R LBCL and 3-SUD regimen for R/R FL-together with intravenous fluids and dexamethasone prophylaxis-are adequate to reduce Grade 2 CRS risk.

论文信息

作者
Li T、Tredennick A、Polhamus D、Putnins M、Liu S、Sanghavi K、Thalhauser CJ、Parikh A
单位
Genmab, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.United States
文献类型
临床试验 · 非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026 Aug
原文标识
PubMed 42411504 · DOI 10.1002/cpt.70362