← 返回前沿论文

采用自动化感兴趣区配准对乳腺癌 TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)评分进行纵向评估

英文原题:Longitudinal evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte scoring using automated region of interest registration in breast cancer.

查看英文原题

Longitudinal evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte scoring using automated region of interest registration in breast cancer.

PubMed 2026/07/03(内容时间) Breast Cancer Res Q1 · IF 6.2(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

我们提出了首个用于纵向 ROI 配准以支持乳腺癌中 TIL 评分的自动化框架。

中文摘要

TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)是乳腺癌(BC)的预后生物标志物,尤其适用于HER2阳性和三阴性亚型。依据国际指南,病理学家在评估全幅苏木精-伊红(H&E)染色切片时,需要综合浸润性肿瘤的代表性区域。然而,手动选区耗时、主观,且可能引入差异,尤其是在连续组织切片间。自动感兴趣区(ROI)配准可能缓解这一局限,但其对纵向TIL评分的影响尚未得到系统评估。本文提出三种ROI配准策略(直接、中间和连续配准,分别包括有无质量控制),并介绍一种经验证的自动化框架,用于一致的TIL评分和复发预测相关性评估。

分析104例浸润性BC病例,每例包括12张连续H&E切片。病理学家分别在第1张和第12张切片上标注ROI,并采用所提出策略配准。使用交并比(IoU)、Dice相似系数(DSC)、失败率和执行时间等指标评估配准表现。两名病理学家在手动和自动ROI上评估TIL。分析第1张手动ROI与第12张切片相应ROI间的纵向一致性,并评估TIL评分与患者复发结局的关联是否保留。

直接配准策略几何精度最高(平均IoU=0.650,DSC=0.769),失败率<1%,执行时间为5.8秒。手动和自动ROI的TIL评分高度一致(P=0.84;Spearman相关系数=0.923,ICC=0.936,CCC=0.915,Cohen κ=0.786)。纵向分析显示,相距较远的切片间无显著变异(P=0.79和P=0.62)。复发与未复发患者的TIL浓度存在显著差异,且这一关联在第1张及第12张切片中均得到保留(P<0.05)。

我们提出首个用于支持BC TIL评分的纵向ROI自动配准框架。该框架可减少人工工作量和评分差异,支持在不同组织深度开展可扩展的免疫生物标志物评估,同时保留具有临床意义的信号,从而支持精准肿瘤免疫学应用。

展开英文摘要原文

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are prognostic biomarkers in breast cancer (BC), particularly in HER2-positive and triple-negative subtypes. Assessment follows the international guidelines, in which pathologists evaluate whole hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides while integrating representative regions of the invasive tumor. However, manual region selection can be labor-intensive, subjective, and may introduce variability, particularly across consecutive tissue sections. Automated region of interest (ROI) registration may mitigate this limitation, yet its impact on longitudinal TIL scoring has not been systematically evaluated. Here, we introduce three ROI registration strategies (direct, intermediate, and serial with/without quality control) and present an automated framework validated for consistent TIL scoring and clinical relevance in predicting relapse.

We analyzed 104 invasive BC cases, each with 12 consecutive H&E slides. A pathologist annotated ROIs on both the first and twelfth slides. We registered these ROIs using the proposed strategies. We then evaluated them with performance metrics, including Intersection over Union (IoU), Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), failure rate, and execution time. Two pathologists scored TILs on manual and automated ROIs. We assessed longitudinal consistency between the first manual ROI and the twelfth slide's corresponding ROIs. We also tested whether the association between TIL score and patient relapse outcomes was preserved.

The direct registration strategy achieved the highest geometric accuracy (mean IoU = 0.650, DSC = 0.769), with < 1% failure rate and 5.8 s execution time. TIL scores for both manual and automated ROIs closely matched (P = 0.84), showing strong agreement (Spearman's = 0.923, ICC = 0.936, CCC = 0.915, Cohen's = 0.786). Longitudinal analyses showed no significant variability across distant sections (P = 0.79 and P = 0.62). TIL concentrations differed significantly between patients with and without relapse, and this association was preserved on both the first and twelfth slides (P < 0.05).

We present the first automated framework for longitudinal ROI registration to support TIL scoring in BC. By reducing manual effort and variability, the framework supports scalable evaluation of immune biomarkers across tissue depth while preserving clinically relevant signals, supporting precision immuno-oncology applications.

论文信息

作者
Fiorin A、Adalid-Llansa L、Reverté L、Sauras-Colón E、Gallardo-Borràs N、Rashwan HA、Bosch-Príncep R、Fischer-Carles A
第一作者单位
Oncological Pathology and Bioinformatics Research Group, Institut de Recerca Biom&#xe8;dica Catalunya Sud (IRB CatSud), Tortosa, Spain. alessio.fiorin@estudiants.urv.cat.Spain
通讯作者单位
Oncological Pathology and Bioinformatics Research Group, Institut de Recerca Biom&#xe8;dica Catalunya Sud (IRB CatSud), Tortosa, Spain. noelia.gallardo@estudiants.urv.cat.Spain
期刊
Breast cancer research : BCR2026 Jul 3
原文标识
PubMed 42400054 · DOI 10.1186/s13058-026-02333-5