CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:MicroRNAs and immunotherapy in testicular germ cell tumors: opportunities and challenges for modulation of the immune microenvironment.
MicroRNAs and immunotherapy in testicular germ cell tumors: opportunities and challenges for modulation of the immune microenvironment.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
睾丸生殖细胞肿瘤(TGCT)是年轻男性中最常见的实体恶性肿瘤。尽管以顺铂为基础的多模式治疗治愈率较高,仍有一部分患者出现复发、铂类难治或治疗抵抗性疾病,挽救治疗选择有限且长期发病负担显著。这一未满足需求重新引发了对免疫治疗的关注,但免疫治疗在TGCT中的成效明显不及其他恶性肿瘤。TGCT常表达PD-L1、存在TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)及其他提示免疫参与的特征,但免疫检查点抑制剂在未筛选患者中的结果大多令人失望,凸显了这一免疫豁免疾病中免疫调控的复杂性。近期概念进展将微小RNA(miRNA)置于这一问题的核心。除已确立的诊断和预后价值外,miRNA日益被认为可调节免疫检查点、抗原呈递通路、细胞因子信号、巨噬细胞极化、树突状细胞和T细胞功能,以及细胞外囊泡介导的肿瘤-免疫细胞交流。
因此,miRNA不仅可能作为疾病活动的生物标志物,也可能决定免疫治疗的敏感性或耐药性。同时,该领域仍存在重要争议:单独的PD-L1表达不能可靠预测应答;低肿瘤突变负荷、睾丸免疫豁免和微环境抑制各自的相对作用仍未厘清;许多被认为与TGCT及免疫调节相关的miRNA仍属推论,尚未在疾病特异性模型中得到因果验证。
因此,在明确哪些miRNA是真正驱动精原细胞瘤与非精原细胞瘤TGCT免疫逃逸的功能因子、它们如何与治疗诱导的肿瘤演化相互作用,以及哪些递送平台可安全实现肿瘤靶向调节等方面,仍存在重大空白。
我们认为,该领域下一阶段应超越描述性生物标志物研究,转向基于机制的TGCT特异性转化策略,将miRNA模拟物、antagomir、细胞外囊泡或miRNA增强型细胞疗法,与表观遗传治疗、放疗、疫苗或CAR-T 等免疫启动方法相结合。此类框架有望实现更精确的生物学分层,并提高难治性TGCT免疫治疗的疗效、持久性和耐受性。
Testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) are the most common solid malignancies in young men and, despite high cure rates with cisplatin-based multimodal therapy, a clinically relevant subset of patients develops relapsed, platinum-refractory, or treatment-resistant disease with limited salvage options and substantial long-term morbidity. This unmet need has renewed interest in immunotherapy, yet the experience in TGCT has been notably less successful than in other malignancies. Although TGCTs often display PD-L1 expression, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and other features suggestive of immune engagement, immune checkpoint inhibitors have produced largely disappointing results in unselected patients, underscoring the complexity of immune regulation in this immune-privileged disease. Recent conceptual advances place microRNAs (miRNAs) at the center of this problem.
Beyond their established diagnostic and prognostic value, miRNAs are increasingly recognized as upstream regulators of immune checkpoints, antigen-presentation pathways, cytokine signaling, macrophage polarization, dendritic-cell and T-cell function, and extracellular-vesicle-mediated tumor-immune crosstalk. This positions miRNAs not only as biomarkers of disease activity, but also as plausible determinants of immunotherapy sensitivity or resistance.
At the same time, the field remains marked by important controversies: PD-L1 expression alone is an unreliable predictor of response; the relative contribution of low tumor mutational burden, testicular immune privilege, and microenvironmental suppression remains unresolved; and many proposed TGCT-associated miRNAs with an immunoregulatory role are still inferential rather than causally validated in disease-specific models.
Accordingly, major gaps persist in defining which miRNAs are true functional drivers of immune escape in seminomatous versus non-seminomatous TGCT, how they interact with therapy-induced tumor evolution, and which delivery platforms can achieve safe, tumor-directed modulation.
We argue that the next phase of the field should move beyond descriptive biomarker studies toward mechanism-based, TGCT-specific translational strategies integrating miRNA mimics, antagomirs, extracellular vesicles, or miRNA-augmented cellular therapies with immune-priming approaches such as epigenetic therapy, radiotherapy, vaccines, or CAR-T platforms. Such a framework could enable more precise biological stratification and improve the efficacy, durability, and tolerability of immunotherapy in refractory TGCT.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。