CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Targeting p53 in Cancer: Functional States, Therapeutic Strategies, and Clinical Progress.
Targeting p53 in Cancer: Functional States, Therapeutic Strategies, and Clinical Progress.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
TP53是人类癌症中最常发生改变的抑癌基因,然而针对p53的治疗性靶向努力所取得的临床成功有限且不一致。我们认为,这一差距反映的并非缺乏可成药的生物学基础,而是一个过度简化的概念框架,即将p53视为二元性的野生型与突变型实体。
在此,我们综合了新出现的证据,支持一种模型,即p53在一系列功能状态谱系中运作,这些状态由突变类别、等位基因负荷、异构体组成、聚集倾向、翻译后调控和细胞背景所定义。这些状态塑造了不同的生物学输出,包括转录活性、显性负性和功能获得性效应、免疫调节以及检查点依赖性,这些共同决定了治疗脆弱性。
我们综述了当前靶向p53通路的策略,包括突变型p53再激活、靶向降解、抗聚集方法、免疫导向疗法、野生型通路活性恢复、基因替代以及DNA损伤应答依赖性的合成致死靶向。临床和临床前证据突出了每种方法的关键局限性,包括化学计量约束、突变特异性、背景依赖性疗效和适应性耐药。
值得注意的是,来自临床前和相关性临床研究的新出现证据表明,治疗结局可能与p53功能状态的关联比与TP53突变状态本身更为密切。
我们进一步强调了p53异构体和肿瘤免疫微环境作为p53活性关键修饰因子和治疗反应决定因素的新出现作用。总体而言,这些见解支持向机制匹配、生物标志物分层的策略转变,使治疗方式与运作中的 p53 网络相一致。未来的进展将取决于将多参数诊断与合理的联合治疗相结合,以充分利用 p53 作为癌症核心脆弱点。
TP53 is the most frequently altered tumor-suppressor gene in human cancer, yet efforts to therapeutically target p53 have yielded limited and inconsistent clinical success.
We argue that this gap reflects not a lack of druggable biology, but an oversimplified conceptual framework that treats p53 as a binary wild-type versus mutant entity.
Here, we synthesize emerging evidence supporting a model in which p53 operates across a spectrum of functional states defined by mutation class, allelic burden, isoform composition, aggregation propensity, post-translational regulation, and cellular context. These states shape distinct biological outputs, including transcriptional activity, dominant-negative and gain-of-function effects, immune modulation, and checkpoint dependency, which collectively determine therapeutic vulnerability.
We review current strategies targeting the p53 pathway, including mutant p53 reactivation, targeted degradation, anti-aggregation approaches, immune-directed therapies, restoration of wild-type pathway activity, gene replacement, and synthetic lethal targeting of DNA damage response dependencies. Clinical and preclinical evidence highlights key limitations of each approach, including stoichiometric constraints, mutation specificity, context-dependent efficacy, and adaptive resistance.
Notably, emerging evidence from preclinical and correlative clinical studies suggests that therapeutic outcomes may be more closely associated with p53 functional state than with TP53 mutation status alone.
We further emphasize the emerging roles of p53 isoforms and the tumor immune microenvironment as critical modifiers of p53 activity and determinants of treatment response. Collectively, these insights support a paradigm shift toward mechanism-matched, biomarker-stratified strategies that align therapeutic modality with the operative p53 network. Future progress will depend on integrating multi-parameter diagnostics with rational combination therapies to fully exploit p53 as a central vulnerability in cancer.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。