← 返回

美国 4L+ 复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤中 CAR-T 细胞治疗与双特异性抗体的治疗排序对长期生存的影响:一项模拟模型

英文原题:Impact of Treatment Sequencing With CAR T-cell Therapies and Bispecific Antibodies on Long-term Survival in 4L+ RRMM in the United States: A Simulation Model.

查看英文原题

Impact of Treatment Sequencing With CAR T-cell Therapies and Bispecific Antibodies on Long-term Survival in 4L+ RRMM in the United States: A Simulation Model.

PubMed 2026/06/05(内容时间) Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk Q1 · IF 4.1(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

在该模拟模型中,4L+ RRMM 患者先用 CAR-T 再用 BsAb,相比先用 BsAb 再用 CAR-T,可将疾病进展或死亡风险显著降低 64%、死亡风险降低 48%,并降低总体治疗费用。

中文摘要

CAR-T 细胞疗法和双特异性抗体(BsAb)越来越多地用于四线及后线复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM),但用于指导最佳治疗排序的长期数据有限。

估算四线及后线RRMM中先CAR-T 后BsAb与先BsAb后CAR-T 两种治疗顺序的无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)及相关成本。 研究设计:采用美国Markov模型,设置时间依赖性转移及10年时间范围,比较两种治疗排序。初始治疗的PFS和OS取自临床试验;后续治疗结局则来自临床试验和真实世界研究的荟萃分析。通过概率敏感性分析(1000次模拟)估算95%可信范围。总成本依据已发表文献计算。

与先BsAb后CAR-T 相比,先CAR-T 后BsAb的生存期显著更长:中位PFS分别为46.4个月(95% CI,38.3–54.5)和16.8个月(95% CI,13.2–18.6)(HR 0.36,95% CI 0.27–0.44);中位OS分别为61.5个月(95% CI,53.8–69.9)和32.0个月(95% CI,13.2–44.5)(HR 0.52,95% CI 0.26–0.91)。10年总成本分别为1,019,513美元(95% CI,934,974–1,105,472)和1,450,958美元(95% CI,1,229,401–1,544,828),节省431,445美元(95% CI,185,905–556,259)。

在本模拟模型中,四线及后线RRMM先CAR-T 后BsAb,与先BsAb后CAR-T 相比,疾病进展或死亡风险降低64%、死亡风险降低48%,且总体治疗费用更低。这些发现支持优先先用CAR-T、随后使用BsAb,以改善长期结局并显著节省成本。

展开英文摘要原文

CAR T-cell therapies and bispecific antibodies (BsAb) are increasingly used in 4L+ relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), but long-term data to inform optimal sequencing are limited.

To estimate progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and costs associated with CAR T followed by BsAb versus BsAb followed by CAR T in 4L+ RRMM. STUDY DESIGN: A US-based Markov model with time-dependent transitions and a 10-year time horizon compared the two treatment sequences. PFS and OS for starting treatments were sourced from clinical trials; subsequent treatment outcomes were derived from meta-analyses of clinical trials and real-world studies. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses (1,000 simulations) estimated 95% credible ranges. Total costs were calculated using published literature.

CAR T before BsAb resulted in significantly longer survival versus BsAb before CAR T: median PFS 46.4 months (95% CI, 38.3-54.5) vs. 16.8 months (95% CI, 13.2-18.6) (HR 0.36 [95% CI 0.27-0.44]); median OS 61.5 months (95% CI, 53.8-69.9) vs. 32.0 months (95% CI, 13.2-44.5) (HR 0.52 [95% CI 0.26-0.91]). Total 10-year costs were $1,019,513 (95% CI, $934,974-1,105,472) vs. $1,450,958 (95% CI, $1,229,401-1,544,828), yielding cost savings of $431,445 (95% CI, $185,905-556,259).

In this simulation model, using CAR T before BsAb in 4L+ RRMM significantly reduced risk of progression or death by 64%, death by 48%, and lowered overall cost of care versus BsAb before CAR T. These findings support the use of CAR T before BsAb in 4L+ RRMM to improve long-term patient outcomes with substantial cost savings.

论文信息

作者
Lipof J、Bloudek B、Ray A、Ting J、Hasegawa K、Gong C、Williams T、Ramsey S
第一作者单位
Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.United States
通讯作者单位
Curta Inc., Seattle, WA. Electronic address: cynthia.gong@curta.com.United States
期刊
Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia2026 Aug
原文标识
PubMed 42342528 · DOI 10.1016/j.clml.2026.05.014