← 返回

氟达拉滨与苯达莫司汀作为大细胞淋巴瘤 CAR-T 前淋巴细胞清除化疗的比较

英文原题:Comparison of Fludarabine Versus Bendamustine as a Lymphodepleting Chemotherapy Prior to CAR-T for Large Cell Lymphoma.

查看英文原题

Comparison of Fludarabine Versus Bendamustine as a Lymphodepleting Chemotherapy Prior to CAR-T for Large Cell Lymphoma.

PubMed 2026/06/24(内容时间) Transplant Cell Ther Q1 · IF 4.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

淋巴细胞清除化疗(LD)可增强CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞扩增、持久性及临床活性。氟达拉滨-环磷酰胺最常用,但替代药物的获益尚不清楚。

本研究在真实世界环境下比较CAR-T 治疗复发/难治性大细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)前采用氟达拉滨或苯达莫司汀LD的结局。利用国际血液和骨髓移植研究中心数据,评估2017至2023年接受商业化CD19 CAR-T 治疗的LBCL患者结局。5256例接受阿基仑赛、替沙仑赛或利基仑赛治疗的患者中,92%和9%分别接受氟达拉滨和苯达莫司汀LD。多变量分析显示,苯达莫司汀组总缓解率(ORR)较低(风险比[HR] 0.773,P=0.0013),但完全缓解率无差异(HR 0.828,P=0.0606)。苯达莫司汀组1年和2年无进展生存期(PFS)较低(P=0.04),而1年和2年总生存期(OS)相近(P=0.65)。

与氟达拉滨组相比,苯达莫司汀组毒性发生率较低,包括重度细胞因子释放综合征(比值比[OR] 0.445,P<0.0001)、免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(OR 0.432,P<0.0001)、持续性细胞减少(OR 0.479,P<0.0001)。苯达莫司汀组治疗相关死亡率(TRM)也较低。根据LD方案分布进行的亚组校正分析得出相同主要结论。无论CAR-T 产品为何,与苯达莫司汀LD患者相比,接受氟达拉滨LD患者ORR和PFS更高,但OS无显著差异;苯达莫司汀则与毒性及TRM发生率降低相关。医务人员可结合患者特征,权衡LD方案的疗效和安全性。苯达莫司汀可作为LBCL CAR-T 治疗前的一种替代LD方案。

展开英文摘要原文

Lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LD) enhances chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) expansion, persistence, and clinical activity. Fludarabine-cyclophosphamide is most used, but the benefit of alternative agents is unknown.

This study compares fludarabine- versus bendamustine-based LD in the real-world setting prior to CAR-T treatment of relapsed or refractory large cell lymphoma (LBCL).

We assessed outcomes of patients with LBCL who received commercial CD19 CAR-T therapies during 2017 to 2023, using data from Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. Of 5256 patients with LBCL treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel, or lisocabtagene maraleucel, 92% and 9% received fludarabine and bendamustine LD, respectively. Multivariate analyses showed bendamustine had inferior overall response rate (ORR) (hazard ratio [HR] 0. 773, P = . 0013), but there was no difference in complete response (HR 0. 828, P = . 0606). The 1-year and 2-year rates of progression-free survival (PFS) were lower for bendamustine (P = . 04), and the 1-year and 2-year rates of overall survival (OS) were similar (P = . 65) The bendamustine group had lower rates of toxicities than the fludarabine group, including severe cytokine release syndrome (odds ratio [OR] 0.

445, P < . 0001), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (OR 0. 432, P < . 0001), prolonged cytopenia (OR 0. 479, P < . 0001) Treatment-related mortality (TRM) was lower in the bendamustine group. In a subset analysis adjusting for distribution of LD regimens, the main conclusions were the same.

Regardless of CAR-T products used, compared to patients who received bendamustine, patients who received fludarabine LD had higher ORR and PFS, without significant impact on OS. Bendamustine was associated with a reduced incidence of toxicities and TRM. Providers can consider relevant patient characteristics when choosing LD and the trade-off between efficacy and safety. Bendamustine can be considered an alternative LD prior to CAR-T for LBCL.

论文信息

作者
Ahmed N、Ali A、Kim S、Oloyede T、Bye M、Gowda L、Kamble RT、Mirza AS
第一作者单位
Division of Hematological Malignancy and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, Kansas.
通讯作者单位
Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR&#xae;), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/Blood and Marrow Transplant, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Electronic address: amoskop@mcw.edu.United States
期刊
Transplantation and cellular therapy2026 Jun 24
原文标识
PubMed 42341926 · DOI 10.1016/j.jtct.2026.06.035