CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Comparison of Fludarabine Versus Bendamustine as a Lymphodepleting Chemotherapy Prior to CAR-T for Large Cell Lymphoma.
Comparison of Fludarabine Versus Bendamustine as a Lymphodepleting Chemotherapy Prior to CAR-T for Large Cell Lymphoma.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
淋巴细胞清除化疗(LD)可增强CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞扩增、持久性及临床活性。氟达拉滨-环磷酰胺最常用,但替代药物的获益尚不清楚。
本研究在真实世界环境下比较CAR-T 治疗复发/难治性大细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)前采用氟达拉滨或苯达莫司汀LD的结局。利用国际血液和骨髓移植研究中心数据,评估2017至2023年接受商业化CD19 CAR-T 治疗的LBCL患者结局。5256例接受阿基仑赛、替沙仑赛或利基仑赛治疗的患者中,92%和9%分别接受氟达拉滨和苯达莫司汀LD。多变量分析显示,苯达莫司汀组总缓解率(ORR)较低(风险比[HR] 0.773,P=0.0013),但完全缓解率无差异(HR 0.828,P=0.0606)。苯达莫司汀组1年和2年无进展生存期(PFS)较低(P=0.04),而1年和2年总生存期(OS)相近(P=0.65)。
与氟达拉滨组相比,苯达莫司汀组毒性发生率较低,包括重度细胞因子释放综合征(比值比[OR] 0.445,P<0.0001)、免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(OR 0.432,P<0.0001)、持续性细胞减少(OR 0.479,P<0.0001)。苯达莫司汀组治疗相关死亡率(TRM)也较低。根据LD方案分布进行的亚组校正分析得出相同主要结论。无论CAR-T 产品为何,与苯达莫司汀LD患者相比,接受氟达拉滨LD患者ORR和PFS更高,但OS无显著差异;苯达莫司汀则与毒性及TRM发生率降低相关。医务人员可结合患者特征,权衡LD方案的疗效和安全性。苯达莫司汀可作为LBCL CAR-T 治疗前的一种替代LD方案。
Lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LD) enhances chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) expansion, persistence, and clinical activity. Fludarabine-cyclophosphamide is most used, but the benefit of alternative agents is unknown.
This study compares fludarabine- versus bendamustine-based LD in the real-world setting prior to CAR-T treatment of relapsed or refractory large cell lymphoma (LBCL).
We assessed outcomes of patients with LBCL who received commercial CD19 CAR-T therapies during 2017 to 2023, using data from Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. Of 5256 patients with LBCL treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel, or lisocabtagene maraleucel, 92% and 9% received fludarabine and bendamustine LD, respectively. Multivariate analyses showed bendamustine had inferior overall response rate (ORR) (hazard ratio [HR] 0. 773, P = . 0013), but there was no difference in complete response (HR 0. 828, P = . 0606). The 1-year and 2-year rates of progression-free survival (PFS) were lower for bendamustine (P = . 04), and the 1-year and 2-year rates of overall survival (OS) were similar (P = . 65) The bendamustine group had lower rates of toxicities than the fludarabine group, including severe cytokine release syndrome (odds ratio [OR] 0.
445, P < . 0001), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (OR 0. 432, P < . 0001), prolonged cytopenia (OR 0. 479, P < . 0001) Treatment-related mortality (TRM) was lower in the bendamustine group. In a subset analysis adjusting for distribution of LD regimens, the main conclusions were the same.
Regardless of CAR-T products used, compared to patients who received bendamustine, patients who received fludarabine LD had higher ORR and PFS, without significant impact on OS. Bendamustine was associated with a reduced incidence of toxicities and TRM. Providers can consider relevant patient characteristics when choosing LD and the trade-off between efficacy and safety. Bendamustine can be considered an alternative LD prior to CAR-T for LBCL.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。