← 返回

免疫检查点抑制剂疗效的预测性生物标志物:癌症免疫治疗时代的挑战、创新与精准医学路径

英文原题:Predictive Biomarkers for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Efficacy: Challenges, Innovations, and a Pathway to Precision Medicine in the Era of Cancer Immunotherapy.

查看英文原题

Predictive Biomarkers for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Efficacy: Challenges, Innovations, and a Pathway to Precision Medicine in the Era of Cancer Immunotherapy.

PubMed 2026/09/03(内容时间) Clin Chem Q1 · IF 8.3(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究思路按摘要原文分段

免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)已彻底改变了肿瘤学实践。然而,治疗反应仍存在异质性,使得预测性生物标志物对于优化患者诊疗至关重要。3种已确立的生物标志物——程序性死亡配体 1、tumor mutational burden(TMB)和微卫星高度不稳定/错配修复缺陷——已获批准并在临床中得到验证,但其对获益的预测能力有限。因此,多种新型预测性生物标志物仍在研究中。内容:本综述重点介绍已确立的和研究中的ICI疗效预测性生物标志物。对于已确立的生物标志物,我们描述其生物学、检测方式、获批的伴随诊断、里程碑式研究以及显著局限性。由于抗肿瘤免疫效应具有多系统性质,研究中的生物标志物涵盖多个领域,包括肿瘤基因组生物标志物(如突变特征、TMB、新抗原克隆性)、肿瘤微环境(如TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)[TILs]、三级淋巴结构)、全身免疫生物标志物(如细胞因子、自身抗体、糖蛋白、外周血单个核细胞)以及微生物组(如胃肠道微生物多样性、应答者富集菌群)。总结:已确立的生物标志物PD-L1、TMB和微卫星高度不稳定/错配修复缺陷为临床实践中的ICI使用提供信息,但具有重要局限性。多种研究中的生物标志物在优化患者选择和优化治疗方面显示出前景。展望未来,增加检测方法协调统一、前瞻性验证和标准化参数可能改善其性能。整合跨领域互补信号的复合模型可能进一步实现个体化治疗,并引领个性化癌症免疫治疗时代。

展开英文摘要原文

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed oncology practice. However, treatment response remains heterogeneous, rendering predictive biomarkers critical for optimal patient care. The 3 established biomarkers, programmed death-ligand 1, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability-high/deficient mismatch repair, are approved and clinically validated but are modest predictors of benefit. As a result, multiple novel predictive biomarkers remain under investigation. CONTENT: This review highlights established and investigational predictive ICI efficacy biomarkers. For established biomarkers, we describe biology, assay modalities, approved companion diagnostics, landmark studies, and notable limitations. Due to the multisystem nature of antitumor immune effects, investigational biomarkers span multiple domains, including tumor genomic biomarkers (e.g., mutational signatures, TMB, neoantigen clonality), tumor microenvironment (e.g., tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes [TILs], tertiary lymphoid structures), systemic immune biomarkers (e.g., cytokines, autoantibodies, glycoproteins, peripheral blood mononuclear cells), and the microbiome (e.g., gastrointestinal microbial diversity, responder-enriched taxa). SUMMARY: The established biomarkers PD-L1, TMB, and microsatellite instability-high/deficient mismatch repair inform ICI use in clinical practice but have important limitations. Multiple investigational biomarkers show promise in refining patient selection and optimizing therapy. Moving forward, increased assay harmonization, prospective validation, and standardized parameters may improve performance. Composite models integrating complementary signals across domains may further individualize treatment and lead to an era of personalized cancer immunotherapy.

论文信息

作者
Lee M、SoRelle JA、Everest-Dass A、Gerber DE、von Itzstein MS
第一作者单位
UT Southwestern Medical School, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.United States
通讯作者单位
Institute for Biomedicine and Glycomics, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.Australia
文献类型
综述
期刊
Clinical chemistry2026 Sep 3
原文标识
PubMed 42314194 · DOI 10.1093/clinchem/hvag062