← 返回

预防性阿那白滞素对复发/难治性 B 细胞淋巴瘤 CD19 CAR-T 细胞治疗后神经毒性与细胞因子释放综合征影响的真实世界评估:逆概率治疗加权分析

英文原题:Real-World Assessment of Prophylactic Anakinra on Neurotoxicity and Cytokine Release Syndrome after CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Relapsed and Refractory B-Cell Lymphoma: An Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Analysis.

查看英文原题

Real-World Assessment of Prophylactic Anakinra on Neurotoxicity and Cytokine Release Syndrome after CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Relapsed and Refractory B-Cell Lymphoma: An Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Analysis.

PubMed 2026/06/17(内容时间) Transplant Cell Ther Q1 · IF 4.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

靶向CD19的CAR-T 细胞疗法显著改善了复发/难治性B细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤(R/R B-NHL)患者的结局,但常并发免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS),这是导致发病和死亡的重要原因。临床前及早期临床研究提示,阻断白细胞介素1(IL-1)的阿那白滞素可能减轻ICANS,且不损害CAR-T 疗效;但评估预防性阿那白滞素疗效和安全性的真实世界数据有限。

我们采用逆概率治疗加权(IPTW)回顾性比较预防性阿那白滞素治疗与对照患者的CAR-T 毒性及临床结局,假设预防用药与重度ICANS减少相关。基于早期研究的良好结果,本机构于2023年实施高危患者预防性使用阿那白滞素的政策。本单中心回顾性队列纳入2018至2025年间接受CD19 CAR-T 治疗的176例成人R/R B-NHL患者。分析仅纳入符合机构预防用药标准者(年龄≥65岁或接受含CD28共刺激结构域的CAR-T 产品),并排除基线ICE评分<8者。比较政策实施后接受阿那白滞素的患者与政策实施前治疗者,并通过IPTW平衡两组基线临床和疾病相关协变量。IPTW调整后,预防性阿那白滞素组任何级别ICANS发生率高于未使用组(40.0%比23.0%,P=0.03),而3级ICANS发生率相近(P=0.62)。多变量回归显示,预防性阿那白滞素与任何级别ICANS发生几率升高相关(校正OR 3.22;95% CI 1.39–7.46),但与3级ICANS无显著关联(校正OR 1.84;95% CI 0.61–5.5)。

两组任何级别细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)发生率相近(P=0.74);但多变量回归显示阿那白滞素预防与3级CRS发生几率升高相关(校正OR 17.83;95% CI 1.30–245.21),但因事件数少,该估计精确度有限。阿那白滞素组第30天和第90天3级感染均较常见(分别为21.5%比7.3%,P=0.01;27.1%比10.4%,P=0.01)。多变量回归中,3级感染仍与阿那白滞素使用相关(第30天:校正OR 7.08;95% CI 1.90–26.30,P=0.004;第90天:校正OR 5.59;95% CI 1.83–17.04,P=0.003)。两组缓解率、无事件生存期及总生存期无差异。在这一单中心高危患者历史对照比较中,预防性阿那白滞素未减少重度ICANS,且与免疫介导毒性及感染并发症增加相关。由于治疗分配受政策影响、存在残余时间混杂且实际协变量重叠有限,因果推断受到限制。这些发现提示,临床试验之外常规预防性使用阿那白滞素需谨慎,并凸显开展前瞻性研究、明确最佳毒性缓解策略的重要性。

展开英文摘要原文

CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy has significantly improved outcomes for patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R B-NHL) but is frequently complicated by immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Preclinical and early-phase clinical studies suggest that interleukin-1 blockade with anakinra may mitigate ICANS without impairing CAR T efficacy.

However, real-world data evaluating the efficacy and safety of prophylactic anakinra remain limited.

We performed a retrospective analysis comparing CAR T toxicities and clinical outcomes among patients treated with prophylactic anakinra versus controls using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), hypothesizing that anakinra prophylaxis would be associated with decreased severe ICANS. In 2023, our institution implemented a policy for anakinra prophylaxis for high-risk patients based on promising early-phase data.

We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of 176 adult patients with R/R B-NHL who received CD19 CAR T therapy between 2018 and 2025. The analysis was restricted to patients meeting institutional criteria for anakinra prophylaxis (age 65 yr or receipt of a CD28 costimulatory domain CAR T product), excluding those with baseline ICE score <8. Patients treated with anakinra in the postpolicy era were compared with patients treated prior to the implementation of the policy. IPTW was used to balance baseline clinical and disease-related covariates between groups. After IPTW, patients receiving prophylactic anakinra had a higher incidence of any-grade ICANS compared with those who did not (40. 0% versus 23. 0%, P = . 03), while rates of grade 3 ICANS were similar between groups (P = . 62). In multivariate regression, anakinra prophylaxis was associated with increased odds of any-grade ICANS (aOR 3. 22; 95% CI 1. 39 to 7. 46) but not grade 3 ICANS (aOR 1. 84; 95% CI 0. 61 to 5. 5). Rates of all-grade cytokine release syndrome (CRS) were comparable (P = .

74); however, in multivariate regression, anakinra prophylaxis was associated with increased odds of grade 3 CRS (aOR 17. 83; 95% CI 1. 30 to 245. 21), though the estimate was imprecise due to sparse events. Grade 3 infections were more common in the anakinra cohort (21. 5% versus 7. 3%; P = . 01) by day 30 and by day 90 (27. 1% versus 10. 4%; P = . 01). Grade 3 infections remained associated with use of anakinra in multivariate regression (day 30: aOR 7. 08; 95% CI 1. 90 to 26. 30, P = . 004) (day 90: aOR 5.

59; 95% CI 1. 83 to 17. 04; P = . 003). No differences in response rates, event-free or overall survival were observed between groups. In this single-center historical comparison of high-risk patients receiving CD19 CAR T cells, prophylactic anakinra did not reduce severe ICANS and was associated with increased immune-mediated toxicities and infectious complications. Causal inference is limited by policy-driven treatment assignment, residual temporal confounding, and limited practical overlap.

These findings suggest the need for caution in routine use of anakinra prophylaxis outside of clinical trials and underscore the importance of prospective studies to better define optimal toxicity mitigation strategies.

论文信息

作者
Easton N、Andreoli M、van Besien H、Gribbin C、Pasciolla M、Alperovich A、Saldarriaga MM、Ma B
第一作者单位
NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell, Hematology &amp; Medical Oncology, New York, New York.United States
通讯作者单位
Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone, New York, New York. Electronic address: Samuel.Yamshon@nyulangone.org.United States
期刊
Transplantation and cellular therapy2026 Sep
原文标识
PubMed 42309461 · DOI 10.1016/j.jtct.2026.06.008