← 返回前沿论文

儿童恶性脑肿瘤中全身性与颅内免疫治疗递送:一项系统综述、荟萃分析和 meta 回归

英文原题:Systemic versus intracranial immunotherapy delivery in pediatric malignant brain tumors: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.

查看英文原题

Systemic versus intracranial immunotherapy delivery in pediatric malignant brain tumors: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.

PubMed 2026/06/12(内容时间) Eur J Pediatr Q1 · IF 2.9(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

免疫治疗的给药途径似乎不影响生存结局。

中文摘要

免疫治疗已成为儿童高级别胶质瘤及弥漫性中线胶质瘤的一种有前景策略,但给药途径的临床影响尚不明确。本研究评估颅内或全身给药是否影响生存和毒性结局。研究按照PRISMA指南开展系统综述和荟萃分析,纳入报告儿童脑肿瘤免疫治疗生存或毒性结局的临床研究。采用随机效应模型合并总生存期(OS)及12个月生存(OS12)的风险比(HR),以及3级神经毒性的比值比(OR),并通过荟萃回归评估给药途径的影响。定量综合纳入22项研究。颅内给药的OS合并HR为1.12(95% CI 0.88–1.42),异质性中等(I²=27.3%);全身给药HR为1.21(95% CI 0.99–1.47),异质性极低(I²=1.1%)。两种给药途径间未见显著差异(HR比值0.93,95% CI 0.67–1.29)。就3级神经毒性而言,颅内给药风险显著较高(OR 73.80,95% CI 41.50–131.20),而全身治疗OR为6.20(95% CI 1.80–20.90)。荟萃回归证实,给药途径与OS或OS12无关,但与神经毒性增加显著相关(回归系数=3.064,p<0.001)。 结论:免疫治疗给药途径似乎不影响生存结局。尽管颅内给药与较高报告率的重度神经毒性相关,但鉴于免疫治疗平台存在异质性,且治疗方式可能造成混杂,应谨慎解读。未来研究应优先采用生物学指导的治疗策略,同时审慎平衡局部暴露与安全性。 已知:局部(颅内)免疫治疗被提出用于改善儿童高级别及弥漫性中线胶质瘤的中枢神经系统药物递送,但其是否优于全身给药尚未证实。早期试验显示生物学活性,但生存和毒性结果不一,因此给药途径的临床影响仍不确定。 新发现:在22项研究中,免疫治疗给药途径与总生存期或12个月生存无关(HR比值分别为0.93和0.87,均无统计学显著性)。颅内给药的重度神经毒性明显更高,但荟萃回归显示,这主要由治疗平台(CAR-T/溶瘤病毒)而非给药途径本身驱动。

展开英文摘要原文

UNLABELLED: Immunotherapy has emerged as a promising strategy for pediatric high-grade gliomas and diffuse midline gliomas, yet the clinical impact of delivery route remains uncertain. This study evaluated whether intracranial or systemic administration influences survival and toxicity outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Clinical studies reporting survival or toxicity outcomes of immunotherapy in pediatric brain tumors were identified. Random-effects models were used to pool hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and 12-month survival (OS12), and odds ratios (ORs) for grade 3 neurotoxicity. Meta-regression assessed the influence of delivery route. Twenty-two studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. Intracranial delivery showed a pooled HR for OS of 1.12 (95% CI 0.88-1.42) with moderate heterogeneity (I 2 = 27.3%), whereas systemic delivery showed HR 1.21 (95% CI 0.99-1.47) with minimal heterogeneity (I 2 = 1.1%). No significant difference between delivery routes was observed (ratio of HRs 0.93, 95% CI 0.67-1.29). For grade 3 neurotoxicity, intracranial administration demonstrated markedly higher risk (OR 73.80, 95% CI 41.50-131.20) compared with systemic therapy (OR 6.20, 95% CI 1.80-20.90). Meta-regression confirmed that delivery route was not associated with OS or OS12 but was significantly associated with increased neurotoxicity ( = 3.064, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Immunotherapy delivery route does not appear to influence survival outcomes. Although intracranial administration was associated with higher reported rates of severe neurotoxicity, this finding should be interpreted cautiously given the heterogeneity of immunotherapy platforms and the potential confounding effect of treatment modality. Future studies should prioritize biologically guided therapeutic strategies while carefully balancing locoregional exposure and safety. WHAT IS KNOWN: Locoregional (intracranial) immunotherapy has been proposed to improve CNS drug delivery in pediatric high-grade and diffuse midline gliomas, but its benefit over systemic administration is unproven. Early-phase trials show biological activity with heterogeneous survival and toxicity, leaving the clinical impact of delivery route uncertain. WHAT IS NEW: Across 22 studies, immunotherapy delivery route was not associated with overall or 12-month survival (rHR 0.93 and 0.87, both non-significant). Intracranial delivery carried markedly higher severe neurotoxicity, but meta-regression showed this was largely driven by treatment platform (CAR-T/oncolytic) rather than route itself.

论文信息

作者
Tykocki T
单位
Department of Paediatric Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital Named After Prof. Dr Med, Jan Bogdanowicz Niek&#x142;a&#x144;ska Street 4/24, Warsaw, 03-924, Poland. ttykocki@gmail.com.Poland
文献类型
系统综述 · 荟萃分析
期刊
European journal of pediatrics2026 Jun 12
原文标识
PubMed 42283902 · DOI 10.1007/s00431-026-07131-x