← 返回

预防性阿那白滞素预防侵袭性 B 细胞淋巴瘤 CAR-T 细胞治疗后神经毒性:单中心真实世界经验

英文原题:Prophylactic Anakinra to Prevent Neurotoxicity After CAR T-Cell Therapy in Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas: A Single-Center Real-World Experience.

查看英文原题

Prophylactic Anakinra to Prevent Neurotoxicity After CAR T-Cell Therapy in Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas: A Single-Center Real-World Experience.

PubMed 2026/05/29(内容时间) Cancers (Basel) Q2 · IF 4.8(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

回顾性分析2019年4月至2022年6月期间在伯尔尼大学医院接受CD19靶向CAR-T 治疗的80例B细胞淋巴瘤患者;产品包括替沙仑赛、阿基仑赛或利基仑赛。一组接受预防性阿那白滞素(输注后第0至+6天皮下注射100 mg),另一组未接受该药。

阿那白滞素组与标准组ICANS发生率相近,分别为14例(35%)和10例(25%)(p=0.464)。3级ICANS发生率也相当,分别为8例(20%)和7例(18%)(p>0.999)。在发生ICANS的患者中,阿那白滞素组住院中位时间数值上较短(27比40天,p=0.077)。阿那白滞素未损害CAR-T 细胞扩增,耐受性良好,未出现治疗相关不良事件。两组总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)等生存结局相近。

本分析中,预防性阿那白滞素未降低ICANS发生率或严重程度,但在发生ICANS的患者中可能与住院时间缩短相关。这是否反映直接治疗作用,还是整体毒性管理改善,尚不确定。仍需更大规模前瞻性研究进一步明确阿那白滞素在CAR-T 治疗后预防ICANS中的作用。

展开英文摘要原文

Background/Objectives : Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy is an effective treatment for relapsed/refractory (r/r) aggressive B-cell lymphomas; however, acute toxicities, such as immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), remain common. Interleukin-1 (IL-1) has been implicated in the pathogenesis of ICANS, suggesting that prophylactic anakinra, an IL-1 receptor antagonist, might reduce its incidence or severity. Methods : We retrospectively analyzed 80 patients with B-cell lymphomas who received CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy (tisagenlecleucel, axicabtagene ciloleucel, or lisocabtagene maraleucel) at the Bern University Hospital between April 2019 and June 2022. One cohort received prophylactic anakinra (100 mg subcutaneously on days 0 to +6 post-infusion), while the comparison cohort did not. Results : The incidence of ICANS was similar between groups (14 patients, 35%) with anakinra vs.

10 (25%) in the standard cohort ( p = 0. 464). Rates of grade 3 ICANS were also comparable (eight (20%) vs. seven (18%), p > 0. 999). Among patients who developed ICANS, median hospitalization was numerically shorter with anakinra (27 vs. 40 days, p = 0. 077). Anakinra did not impair CAR T-cell expansion and was well tolerated, with no treatment-related adverse events. Survival outcomes, including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), were similar between cohorts.

Conclusions : In summary, prophylactic anakinra did not reduce the incidence or severity of ICANS in our analysis; however, it may be associated with shorter hospitalization in affected patients. Whether this reflects a direct therapeutic effect or improved overall toxicity management remains uncertain. Larger prospective studies are warranted to further clarify the role of anakinra for prophylactic treatment of ICANS following CAR T-cell therapy.

论文信息

作者
Schmid T、Shaforostova I、Bacher U、Seipel K、Kronig MN、Pabst T
单位
Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.Switzerland
期刊
Cancers2026 May 29
原文标识
PubMed 42279369 · DOI 10.3390/cancers18111787