← 返回前沿论文

转移性葡萄膜黑色素瘤治疗方式的疗效比较:一项系统评价和网络 meta 分析

英文原题:Comparative efficacy of therapeutic modalities for metastatic uveal melanoma: a systemic review and network meta-analysis.

查看英文原题

Comparative efficacy of therapeutic modalities for metastatic uveal melanoma: a systemic review and network meta-analysis.

PubMed 2026/05/20(内容时间) Front Oncol Q2 · IF 3.4(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

基于现有数据,在转移性葡萄膜黑色素瘤中,与 Tebentafusp、ICIs 及其他治疗方式相比,肝脏导向治疗联合 ICIs 在延长 OS 和 PFS 方面取得了最佳结果。有必要开展纳入新兴疗法的未来对比研究。

研究思路结论见上方概要

评估不同治疗方式治疗转移性葡萄膜黑色素瘤(mUM)的疗效。

根据PRISMA标准,我们通过检索PubMed、Embase和The Cochrane Library(截至2026年3月31日)确定了相关的随机对照试验(RCT)。纳入肝转移性葡萄膜黑色素瘤患者。使用R 4.2.0进行临床预后因素分析。主要测量结局为总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。

共筛选出2000年至2026年间的16篇文章,涉及2585例患者。这些试验评估了八种治疗方法:tebentafusp、免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)、靶向治疗、靶向治疗联合化疗、化疗、肝脏导向治疗(LDT)、肝脏导向治疗联合ICIs,以及肝脏导向治疗联合化疗。纳入试验的结果显示,在总生存期和无进展生存期方面,无论HLA基因型如何,肝脏导向治疗联合ICIs最为有效。在比较的治疗中,tebentafusp的OS位居第二,但PFS最差。免疫检查点抑制剂在改善OS方面劣于tebentafusp,但在PFS方面优于tebentafusp。此外,与常规全身化疗、靶向治疗或其联合方案相比,区域性肝脏导向治疗在OS和PFS方面均表现出更有利的结果。由于缺乏对照试验或研究仍在进行中,新兴免疫疗法(如肿瘤疫苗、溶瘤病毒疗法、TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)和新型靶向药物未能纳入NMA。

展开英文摘要原文

To evaluate the efficacy of different therapeutic modalities in the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM).

According to PRISMA criteria, We identified relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) by searching PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library through March 31, 2026. Patients with liver metastatic uveal melanoma were enrolled. The analysis of clinical prognostic factors was performed using R 4.2.0. The main outcomes measured were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

A total of 16 articles were screened between 2000 and 2026, involving 2585 patients. The trials evaluated eight treatment approaches: tebentafusp, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), targeted therapy, targeted therapy plus chemotherapy, chemotherapy, liver-directed therapy (LDT), liver-directed therapy combined with ICIs, and liver-directed therapy plus chemotherapy. The results of the included trials showed that in terms of overall survival and progression-free survival, the liver-directed therapy combined with ICIs were the most effective regardless of the HLA genotype. Tebentafusp showed the second-best OS but the worst PFS among the compared treatments. Immune checkpoint inhibitors were inferior to tebentafusp in improving OS but were superior in PFS. Furthermore, compared with conventional systemic chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or their combination, regional liver-directed therapy demonstrated more favorable outcomes in both OS and PFS. Emerging immunotherapies (e.g., tumor vaccines, oncolytic virotherapy, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes) and novel targeted agents could not be included in the NMA due to the absence of comparative trials or ongoing investigations.

The liver-directed therapy combined with ICIs achieved the best results compared to Tebentafusp, ICIs and other therapeutic modality for OS and PFS extension in metastatic uveal melanoma based on available data. Future comparative studies incorporating emerging therapies are warranted. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420261393862.

论文信息

作者
Chen Q、Zhou J、Zhou H、Wang H、Li J
单位
Department of Ophthalmology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.China
文献类型
系统综述
期刊
Frontiers in oncology2026
原文标识
PubMed 42245738 · DOI 10.3389/fonc.2026.1811719