← 返回

loncastuximab tesirine 治疗复发/难治性弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的疗效和安全性:系统综述和荟萃分析

英文原题:Efficacy and safety of loncastuximab tesirine in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

查看英文原题

Efficacy and safety of loncastuximab tesirine in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PubMed 2026/06/04(内容时间) Syst Rev Q1 · IF 5.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

这项荟萃分析支持 loncastuximab tesirine 单药治疗在经多线治疗的 R/R DLBCL 中的疗效,ORR 约为 47%,毒性可控。

中文摘要

复发/难治性弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(R/R DLBCL)仍是治疗挑战,尤其对不适合干细胞移植或CAR-T 细胞疗法的患者。CD19靶向抗体药物偶联物loncastuximab tesirine在近期研究中显示出良好的单药活性,并已获批用于这一情境。本荟萃分析旨在评估loncastuximab tesirine单药治疗R/R DLBCL患者的疗效和安全性。

按照PRISMA 2020指南开展系统综述,检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane CENTRAL自建库以来至2025年3月的研究。纳入报告loncastuximab tesirine单药治疗临床结局且设有明确疗效和安全性终点的研究。符合标准的7项研究包括3项临床试验和4项观察性队列研究。两名评审者独立提取数据。使用R(4.5.1版)进行绝对风险随机效应模型合并分析。采用I²统计量评估异质性,通过Egger检验和漏斗图评估发表偏倚。

合并总体缓解率(ORR)为47.3%(95% CI 33.5%–61.3%),完全缓解(CR)率为22.0%(95% CI 16.7%–27.7%)。1年总生存率(OS)和无进展生存率(PFS)分别为48.2%(95% CI 17.8%–79.3%)和31.2%(95% CI 9.2%–58.9%),研究间存在显著异质性。在临床试验亚组中,ORR和CR率分别为47.3%(95% CI 33.3%–61.5%)和23.9%(95% CI 21.9%–26.1%);1年OS和PFS分别为43.8%(95% CI 25.2%–63.3%)和28.0%(95% CI 14.6%–43.8%)。未检测到发表偏倚。98.7%的患者发生治疗期间不良事件(AE),82.6%发生3级事件。常见血液学AE包括贫血(47.7%;3级13.6%)、白细胞减少(16%;3级9.7%)、中性粒细胞减少(32.9%;3级22.4%)和血小板减少(24.3%;3级16.1%)。常见非血液学AE包括疲劳(20%)、发热(15.6%)、呕吐(12.4%)和腹痛(11.4%);其他报告事件包括低钾血症(25.5%)、皮疹(20%)和外周水肿(23.7%)。

本荟萃分析支持loncastuximab tesirine单药治疗经多线治疗R/R DLBCL的疗效,ORR约47%,毒性可管理。这些发现进一步支持其作为治疗选择有限患者的一项有价值方案,并凸显需要随机研究以优化患者选择和治疗排序。

展开英文摘要原文

Relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) remains a therapeutic challenge, particularly for patients ineligible for stem-cell transplantation or CAR T-cell therapy. Loncastuximab tesirine, a CD19-directed antibody-drug conjugate, has demonstrated promising single-agent activity in recent studies and is approved in this setting. In this meta-analysis, we aim to assess the efficacy and safety of loncastuximab tesirine monotherapy in patients with R/R DLBCL.

A systematic review was conducted per PRISMA 2020 guidelines, searching PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception until March 2025. Studies reporting clinical outcomes of loncastuximab tesirine monotherapy with defined efficacy and safety endpoints were included. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, including three clinical trials and four observational cohort studies. Two reviewers independently extracted data. Pooled analyses were conducted in R (version 4.5.1) using absolute risk and random-effects modeling. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I 2 statistic; publication bias was evaluated via Egger's test and funnel plots.

The pooled overall response rate (ORR) was 47.3% (95% CI 33.5-61.3%), and the complete response (CR) rate was 22.0% (95% CI 16.7-27.7%). One-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 48.2% (95% CI 17.8-79.3%) and 31.2% (95% CI 9.2-58.9%), respectively, with substantial heterogeneity across studies. In the clinical trial subgroup, ORR and CR were 47.3% (95% CI 33.3-61.5%) and 23.9% (95% CI 21.9-26.1%), while 1-year OS and PFS were 43.8% (95% CI 25.2-63.3%) and 28.0% (95% CI 14.6-43.8%), respectively. No publication bias was detected. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 98.7% of patients, with grade 3 events in 82.6%. Common hematologic AEs included anemia (47.7%; grade 3: 13.6%), leukopenia (16%, grade 3: 9.7%), neutropenia (32.9%; grade 3: 22.4%), and thrombocytopenia (24.3%; grade 3: 16.1%). Frequent non-hematologic AEs included fatigue (20%), fever (15.6%), vomiting (12.4%), and abdominal pain (11.4%). Other reported events included hypokalemia (25.5%), rash (20%), and peripheral edema (23.7%).

This meta-analysis supports the efficacy of loncastuximab tesirine monotherapy in heavily pretreated R/R DLBCL, with an ORR of ~ 47% and manageable toxicity. These findings reinforce its role as a valuable treatment option in patients with limited alternatives and highlight the need for randomized studies to optimize patient selection and sequencing strategies.

论文信息

作者
Khan A、Habib H、Butt AI、Khan I、Aziz K、Alokozay E、Kamran H、Qasim SA
第一作者单位
Memorial Healthcare System, Penbrook Pines, Hollywood, FL, USA.United States
通讯作者单位
Faculty of Medicine, Kandahar University, Kandahar, Afghanistan. hebibzaiehsanullah@gmail.com.
文献类型
系统综述 · 荟萃分析
期刊
Systematic reviews2026 Jun 4
原文标识
PubMed 42244006 · DOI 10.1186/s13643-026-03216-8