CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Comparative pharmacokinetic derivations for axicabtagene ciloleucel and brexucabtagene autoleucel in the treatment of B cell malignancies.
Comparative pharmacokinetic derivations for axicabtagene ciloleucel and brexucabtagene autoleucel in the treatment of B cell malignancies.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
Axicabtagene ciloleucel(axi-cel)和 brexucabtagene autoleucel(brexu-cel)是自体抗 CD19 嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T 细胞产品,分别最初在关键 ZUMA-1 和 ZUMA-2 临床研究中获批用于复发/难治性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(r/r LBCL)和复发/难治性套细胞淋巴瘤(MCL)。axi-cel 和 brexu-cel 的药代动力学(PK)特征已得到充分描述,并与安全性和疗效相关。
然而,临床试验和真实世界研究中用于推导 CAR-T 分子 PK 的方法差异很大、缺乏标准化,且常未一致考虑细胞组成。本研究评估 axi-cel 和 brexu-cel 的三种 PK 推导方法,分别采用定量 PCR(qPCR)或微滴数字 PCR(ddPCR):(1)qPCR(CAR-T 细胞/L 血液);(2)ddPCR 标准法(CAR 拷贝/µg DNA);(3)ddPCR 归一化法(CAR-T 细胞/L 血液)。研究进一步考察 ZUMA-1 和 ZUMA-2 中 PK 与临床结局的相关性。不同方法之间,qPCR 与 ddPCR 归一化结果相关性更强,而 ddPCR 标准法与前两者相关性较弱。与 ddPCR 标准法相比,qPCR 和 ddPCR 归一化结果与客观应答和毒性具有更强相关性。研究结果为 axi-cel 和 brexu-cel 的 PK 推导提供了框架,有助于纵向监测 CAR-T 细胞。
Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel) are autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell products originally approved in the pivotal ZUMA-1 and ZUMA-2 clinical studies for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (r/r) large B cell lymphoma (r/r LBCL) and r/r mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), respectively.
The pharmacokinetics (PKs) of axi-cel and brexu-cel are well characterized to associate with safety and efficacy. Methods for deriving molecular PKs to quantify CD19 CAR T cell levels in clinical trials and real-world settings vary widely, lack standardization, and often do not consistently account for cellular composition.
This study evaluated three distinct PK derivation methods for axi-cel and brexu-cel, utilizing either quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) or droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), with corresponding units: (1) qPCR (CAR T cells/ L of blood), (2) ddPCR standard (CAR copies/ g of DNA), and (3) ddPCR normalized (CAR T cells/ L of blood).
This study further examined correlations between PK and clinical outcomes in ZUMA-1 and ZUMA-2. Across the methods, qPCR and ddPCR normalized were more tightly associated, whereas ddPCR standard poorly correlated with qPCR and ddPCR normalized. qPCR and ddPCR normalized strongly correlated with objective responses and toxicity compared to ddPCR standard . The findings provide a framework for axi-cel and brexu-cel PK derivations to facilitate longitudinal CAR T cell monitoring.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。