CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Real-World Experience With a ZUMA-1 Cohort 4 Adopted Approach to CRS and ICANS in CAR-T Recipients.
Real-World Experience With a ZUMA-1 Cohort 4 Adopted Approach to CRS and ICANS in CAR-T Recipients.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
Axicabtagene ciloleucel(Axi-cel)是一种已获批用于复发/难治性(R/R)大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)的CAR-T 细胞疗法。关键性 I/II 期 ZUMA-1 研究的队列 1 和队列 4 对细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)和免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)的毒性管理进行了调整:队列 4 更早使用托珠单抗和糖皮质激素。在这项真实世界单中心研究中,119 名 R/R LBCL 患者接受 Axi-cel CAR-T 治疗,其中队列 1 有 70 人,队列 4 有 49 人。研究显示,早期干预策略显著减少毒性、重症监护病房(ICU)使用和累计类固醇用量。两组实验室指标和合并症无显著差异,唯队列 4 肾功能不全发生率较高(28.6% 对 4.3%,p<0.01)。队列 4 的 CRS 最高级别显著低于队列 1(1 级对 2 级,p<0.01)。
此外,队列 4 早期干预组累计糖皮质激素用量显著较少(地塞米松等效剂量 110 mg 对 190 mg)。这些有利结果并未损害疗效或临床结局,两种毒性管理策略的总缓解率、无进展生存期和总生存期相近。
Axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-cel) is a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). The registrational phase 1/2 ZUMA-1 study cohorts 1 and 4 addressed toxicity management in terms of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) whereby tocilizumab and corticosteroids were deployed earlier in cohort 4.
In this real-world, single-institution study of 119 patients receiving Axi-cel CAR-T therapy for R/R LBCL with 70 in cohort 1 and 49 in cohort 4, we demonstrate significantly less toxicity, intensive care unit (ICU) utilization, and cumulative steroid use with an early intervention strategy.
Laboratory parameters and comorbidities did not significantly differ between groups except for a higher incidence of renal insufficiency in the cohort 4 group (28. 6% vs. 4. 3%, p < 0. 01). The maximum grade CRS was significantly lower for cohort 4 versus 1 (1 vs. 2, p < 0. 01).
Furthermore, cumulative corticosteroid use was significantly less in the cohort 4 early intervention group (110 mg vs. 190 mg dexamethasone equivalents). These favorable findings did not have a deleterious impact on outcomes and efficacy with similar overall response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival with both toxicity management approaches.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。