CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Anti-CD3/CD20 bispecific antibodies as salvage therapy after CAR-T failure in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Anti-CD3/CD20 bispecific antibodies as salvage therapy after CAR-T failure in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
接受抗 CD19 CAR-T 细胞治疗后进展的复发/难治性(R/R)大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)患者预后不佳,治疗选择有限。双特异性抗体(BsAb)已成为有希望的挽救策略。本荟萃分析评估 CAR-T 治疗失败后 CD3×CD20 BsAb 在 R/R LBCL 患者中的疗效和安全性。研究系统回顾 2021 至 2025 年发表的临床研究,并采用随机效应模型进行合并及亚组分析。共纳入 15 项研究、1,169 名患者。合并总缓解率(ORR)为 45%(95% CI:37–53),完全缓解(CR)率为 30%(95% CI:25–35)。与未接受 CAR-T 的患者相比,既往接受 CAR-T 与 BsAb 疗效降低相关(ORR:45% 对 69%,P=0.039;CR:30% 对 45%,P=0.020)。CAR-T 后复发间隔越长,疗效越好:早期复发(原文阈值符号缺失,显示为 90 天)、中期复发(91–180 天)和晚期复发(181 天至 1 年)的 ORR 分别为 26%、57% 和 71%(P=0.0008),CR 率分别为 10%、29% 和 56%(P=0.0005)。在所研究药物中,epcoritamab 的 ORR 最高。
此外,与单药和静脉给药相比,联合方案和皮下给药应答更佳。细胞因子释放综合征是最常见的毒性,主要为 1–2 级;神经毒性和血液学不良事件可管理。
总之,CD3×CD20 BsAb 在 CAR-T 治疗失败后的 R/R LBCL 患者中具有有意义的疗效和可接受的安全性,尤其适用于复发间隔较长者。
Patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) who experience disease progression following anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy face poor prognoses and limited therapeutic options. Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) have emerged as a promising salvage strategy. This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CD3 CD20 BsAbs in R/R LBCL patients after CAR-T failure. Clinical studies published between 2021 and 2025 were systematically reviewed, and a random-effects model was applied for pooled and subgroup analyses. A total of fifteen studies involving 1,169 patients were included.
The pooled overall response rate (ORR) was 45% (95% CI, 37-53), while the complete response (CR) rate was 30% (95% CI, 25-35). Prior CAR-T exposure was associated with reduced BsAb efficacy compared to CAR-T-na ve patients (ORR: 45% vs. 69%, P = 0. 039; CR: 30% vs. 45%, P = 0. 020).
Longer relapse intervals following CAR-T therapy correlated with improved efficacy: early relapse ( 90 days), intermediate relapse (91-180 days), and late relapse (181 days-1 year) yielded ORRs of 26%, 57%, and 71%, respectively (P = 0. 0008), and CR rates of 10%, 29%, and 56%, respectively (P = 0. 0005). Among the agents studied, epcoritamab demonstrated the highest ORR.
In addition, combination regimens and subcutaneous administration showed superior responses compared to monotherapy and intravenous dosing. Cytokine release syndrome was the most common toxicity, predominantly grade 1-2, while neurotoxicity and hematologic adverse events were manageable.
In conclusion, CD3 CD20 BsAbs exhibit meaningful efficacy and acceptable safety profiles in R/R LBCL patients following CAR-T failure, particularly in those with longer relapse intervals.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。