CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Health care resource use in the management of patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma - Canadian perspective.
Health care resource use in the management of patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma - Canadian perspective.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
Epcoritamab 是首个获批用于复发/难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(R/R-DLBCL)的皮下注射(SC)双特异性抗体,其 SC 给药方式在医疗资源利用(HCRU)方面具有潜在优势。本研究旨在估算 R/R-DLBCL 治疗的 HCRU 及相关成本,为加拿大和魁北克视角的卫生技术评估机构、机构决策者和医疗保健专业人员(HCP)提供信息。次要目标包括使用社会视角,并估算给药所涉及的椅位时间和 HCP 时间。
开发了一项为期 1 年的成本分析,将 epcoritamab 与其他 R/R-DLBCL 治疗进行比较,包括 glofitamab、CAR-T 细胞疗法、化疗、Pola-BR 和 Tafa-Len。HCRU 及相关成本包括治疗前、给药、监测和不良事件管理。活性治疗药物的采购成本被排除在外。评估了多个时间范围。模型输入来自产品标签,并由临床专家验证以反映实践。
从加拿大和魁北克医疗系统视角来看,1 年总 HCRU 成本分别为 $11,009 至 $54,946 和 $10,041 至 $54,362。Epcoritamab 在成本上排名为仅次于化疗的第二低,其显著的 HCRU 节省由 SC 注射的低给药成本和不良事件管理成本驱动。从社会视角和评估 2 年时间范围的情景分析来看,Epcoritamab 的排名相似。Epcoritamab 的年椅位时间和 HCP 时间最低,从而释放了资源和 HCP 可用性。
考虑到加拿大医疗体系受到高度约束,与其它可用治疗相比,SC epcoritamab可带来显著的HCRU相关成本节约、椅旁时间节约和HCP时间节约,使其成为加拿大R/R-DLBCL一种有效、高效且以患者为中心的治疗选择。这篇文章是关于什么的?复发/难治性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(R/R-DLBCL)的治疗包括多种疗法,每种疗法都有各自的给药方案、给药方式、不良事件发生率和监测要求。Epcoritamab是首个用于R/R-DLBCL的皮下(SC)治疗,最近已获得加拿大卫生部的上市许可。然而,迄今为止,尚无研究评估像epcoritamab这样的新型疗法与其它R/R-DLBCL治疗相比的医疗资源利用及相关成本。鉴于加拿大医疗体系和劳动力面临的危机,优化治疗管理以减轻医疗体系压力势在必行。因此,我们开展了这项研究,以评估epcoritamab与其它R/R-DLBCL治疗相比的医疗资源利用及相关成本,从而更好地了解这些治疗对医疗体系的影响。结果是什么?从加拿大和魁北克医疗体系的角度来看,与其它当前和新型R/R-DLBCL治疗相比,epcoritamab被发现是成本第二低的治疗选择。由于其SC给药方式,epcoritamab也被评估为总椅旁时间和医疗人员时间最少的治疗。这些结果意味着什么?与R/R-DLBCL的其他治疗相比,SC epcoritamab节省的医疗资源有助于缓解加拿大医疗系统的压力。这可以使资源重新分配到其他机构优先事项上,从而增强向加拿大患者提供的医疗服务的可及性和标准。
Aim: Epcoritamab, the first subcutaneous (SC) bispecific approved for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R-DLBCL), offers potential advantages in terms of healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) associated with its SC administration.
This study aimed to estimate HCRU and associated costs of R/R-DLBCL treatments, to inform health technology assessment agencies, institutional decision makers and healthcare professionals (HCP) from both a Canadian and Quebec perspective. Secondary objectives included using a societal perspective and estimating chair time and HCP time involved in administering treatments. Materials & methods: A 1-year costing analysis was developed comparing epcoritamab to other R/R-DLBCL treatments, including glofitamab, CAR-T cell therapies, chemotherapy, Pola-BR and Tafa-Len. HCRU and associated costs included pretreatment, administration, monitoring, and adverse event management. Acquisition costs of active treatments were excluded. Multiple time horizons were assessed. Model inputs were retrieved from product labels and validated by clinical experts to reflect practice. Results: From the Canadian and Quebec healthcare system perspective, total 1-year HCRU costs ranged from $11,009 to $54,946 and $10,041 to $54,362, respectively.
Epcoritamab ranked as the second least costly comparator after chemotherapy, with notable HCRU savings driven by low administration costs of SC injections and adverse event management costs. Epcoritamab ranked similarly from a societal perspective and scenario analysis evaluating a 2-year time-horizon. Epcoritamab had the lowest annual chair time and HCP time, freeing up resources and HCP availability.
Conclusion: Considering the highly constrained Canadian healthcare system, SC epcoritamab offers substantial HCRU-related cost saving, chair time savings and HCP time savings when compared with other available treatments, making it an effective, efficient and patient-centric treatment option for R/R-DLBCL in Canada. What is this article about?
Treatments for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R-DLBCL) include a wide array of therapies, each with their own dosing schedules, methods of administration, adverse event rates and monitoring requirements. Epcoritamab, the first subcutaneous (SC) treatment for R/R-DLBCL, has recently received marketing authorization from Health Canada.
However, to date, no study has assessed the healthcare resources utilization and associated costs of a novel therapy like epcoritamab versus other R/R-DLBCL treatments. Given the crisis surrounding Canada's healthcare system and workforce, it is imperative to optimize treatment management to alleviate the strain on the healthcare system.
Therefore, we performed this research to assess the healthcare resources utilization and associated costs of epcoritamab versus other R/R-DLBCL treatments, to better understand the impact of these treatments on the healthcare system. What were the results? From both the Canadian and Quebec healthcare system perspective, epcoritamab was found to be the second least costly treatment option compared with other current and novel treatments for R/R-DLBCL.
Epcoritamab was also assessed as the treatment with the least total chair time and healthcare personnel time, due to its SC mode of administration. What do the results mean? The healthcare resources saved with SC epcoritamab compared with other treatments in R/R-DLBCL could help alleviate the strain on the Canadian healthcare system. This could allow resources to be redirected to other institutional priorities, and thereby enhance the accessibility and standard of healthcare services provided to Canadian patients.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。