CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Safety and efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy in central nervous system lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Safety and efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy in central nervous system lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
CAR-T 治疗在 CNS 淋巴瘤中取得稳健的缓解率,PCNSL 与 SCNSL 之间的疗效相当。神经毒性仍然常见但可控,严重 CRS 事件不常见。
CAR-T 细胞疗法在中枢神经系统淋巴瘤(CNSL)中的安全性和有效性仍不确定,因为关键性CAR-T 细胞试验中中枢神经系统受累的代表性有限。本meta分析综合了评估CAR-T 治疗原发性(PCNSL)和继发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤(SCNSL)队列结局的研究数据。
截至2025年10月,在PubMed、Embase和临床注册库中进行了全面检索。纳入报告CD19靶向CAR-T 治疗后CNSL疗效或毒性结局的研究。采用Freeman-Tukey双重反正弦变换稳定比例,并使用逆方差加权法进行合并。采用DerSimonian-Laird方法估计研究间异质性,并通过Jackson方法计算置信区间。使用Egger回归评估发表偏倚。亚组和多重meta回归分析评估了调节因素,包括CNS类别(PCNSL vs SCNSL)和发表年份。
对38项研究的数据进行了meta分析。汇总的总体缓解率(ORR)为0.75 [95% CI:0.70-0.79],存在中度至显著异质性(I = 53.3%)。完全缓解(CR)率为0.52 [0.46-0.58],部分缓解(PR)率为0.18 [0.14-0.22]。未检测到显著发表偏倚(ORR的Egger's p = 0.39)。Meta回归显示发表年份或淋巴瘤亚型对缓解无显著影响。细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)发生率为83.5% [79.0-88.0],其中3级CRS为5.77% [3.0-9.0]。免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)报告率为44.9% [36.0-54.0],严重(3级)事件为17.4% [12.0-23.0]。ICANS的异质性显著(I = 84.2%),而CRS为中度(I = 64.3%)。
The safety and efficacy of Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in Central Nervous System Lymphoma (CNSL) remain uncertain, given the limited representation of CNS involvement in pivotal CAR T-cell trials. This meta-analysis synthesized data from studies evaluating outcomes in both primary (PCNSL) and secondary CNS lymphoma (SCNSL) cohorts treated with CART.
A comprehensive search was performed across PubMed, Embase, and clinical registries up to October 2025. Studies reporting efficacy or toxicity outcomes in CNSL following CD19-targeted CART therapy were included. Proportions were stabilized using the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation and pooled using inverse variance weighting. Between-study heterogeneity was estimated with the DerSimonian-Laird method, and confidence intervals were calculated via the Jackson approach. Publication bias was assessed using Egger's regression. Subgroup and multiple meta-regression analyses evaluated moderators including CNS category (PCNSL vs SCNSL) and publication year.
Data from thirty-eight studies were meta-analyzed. The pooled overall response rate (ORR) was 0.75 [95% CI: 0.70-0.79] with moderate-to-substantial heterogeneity (I = 53.3%). Complete response (CR) rate was 0.52 [0.46-0.58], and partial response (PR) rate 0.18 [0.14-0.22]. No significant publication bias was detected (Egger's p = 0.39 for ORR). Meta-regression indicated no significant effect of publication year or lymphoma subtype on response. Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) occurred in 83.5% [79.0-88.0], with grade 3 CRS in 5.77% [3.0-9.0]. Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS) was reported in 44.9% [36.0-54.0], with severe (grade 3) events in 17.4% [12.0-23.0]. Heterogeneity was substantial for ICANS (I = 84.2%) but moderate for CRS (I = 64.3%).
CART therapy achieves robust response rates in CNS lymphoma, with efficacy comparable between PCNSL and SCNSL. Neurotoxicity remains frequent but manageable, and severe CRS events are infrequent. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420251070033.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。