← 返回

大 B 细胞淋巴瘤抗 CD19 CAR-T 细胞治疗前的桥接放疗:单中心研究结果

英文原题:Bridging radiotherapy before anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for Large B-cell lymphoma - results from a single-center study.

查看英文原题

Bridging radiotherapy before anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for Large B-cell lymphoma - results from a single-center study.

PubMed 2026/03/31(内容时间) Radiat Oncol Q1 · IF 3.6(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

我们的数据表明,RT 是 CAR-T 细胞治疗前一种可行且有效的减瘤方式,与全身化疗联合使用时也是如此。

研究思路结论见上方概要

放疗(RT)联合免疫化疗(ICT)后序贯 CAR-T 细胞治疗可能通过减瘤和增强抗原扩散产生协同效应,从而诱导抗肿瘤免疫应答。本研究旨在分析抗 CD19 靶向 CAR-T 细胞治疗前使用 RT 的回顾性对比数据,特别关注减瘤和 RT 相关副作用。

所有年龄≥18岁、于2019年5月至2023年8月在本机构接受抗CD19 CAR-T 细胞治疗的复发/难治性大B细胞淋巴瘤(r/r LBCL)患者均被回顾性分析,RT治疗组包括所有接受RT并伴或不伴同步系统性治疗的患者。对照组(CO)根据年龄、既往治疗线数和淋巴细胞清除时的缓解状态进行人工匹配。7例患者中有6例在CAR-T 前计算了RT后肿瘤体积(TV),1例在CAR-T 后计算。主要终点为TV缩小以及CAR-T 和RT相关副作用。次要终点包括总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。

最终分析纳入8例在CAR-T 细胞输注前60天内接受RT的患者和8例对照。8例中有6例接受了同步桥接治疗。从基线到RT后,单独RT或联合同步全身治疗使照射野内TV显著缩小(平均缩小68%)(p = 0.028)。RT与CAR-T 细胞治疗联合与CAR-T 相关副作用或并发症发生率升高无关(细胞因子释放综合征 p = 0.6,免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性 p = 0.2,皮质类固醇使用 p > 0.9,Tocilizumab使用 p > 0.9,转入重症监护病房 p = 0.6)。RT组与CO组的OS和PFS无差异(OS p = 0.64,PFS p = 0.35)。

展开英文摘要原文

Radiotherapy (RT) with immunochemotherapy (ICT) followed by CAR T-cell therapy may have synergistic effects due to cytoreduction and enhancing antigen spread, thereby inducing anti-cancer immune responses. The aim of this study was to analyze retrospective comparative data on the use of RT prior to anti-CD19 directed CAR T-cell therapy with a special focus on cytoreduction and RT related side effects.

All patients aged 18 years with relapsed/ refractory Large B-Cell-lymphoma (r/r LBCL) treated with anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in our institution from 05/ 2019-08/2023 were analyzed retrospectively, with the RT therapy group comprising all patients receiving RT with or without concomitant systemic therapy. The control (CO) group was manually matched on age, prior therapy lines and remission state at lymphodepletion. Post-RT tumor volumes (TV) were calculated for 6 out of 7 patients pre-CAR T and for 1 patient post-CAR T. Primary endpoints were reduction of TV and CAR T as well as RT related side effects. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS).

8 patients receiving RT within 60 days prior to CAR T-cell infusion and 8 controls were included in the final analysis. 6 out of 8 patients received concomitant bridging therapy. RT alone or in combination with concomitant systemic therapy led to a significant reduction of TV (average reduction of 68%) within the radiated field from baseline to post RT (p = 0.028). The combination of RT and CAR T-cell therapy was not associated with an increased rate of CAR T related side effects or complications (cytokine release syndrome p = 0.6, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity p = 0.2, corticosteroid use p > 0.9, Tocilizumab use p > 0.9, transfer to intensive care unit p = 0.6). OS and PFS did not differ between the RT- and CO-group (OS p = 0.64, PFS p = 0.35).

Our data indicate that RT is a feasible and effective way of cytoreduction before CAR T-cell therapy, also in combination with systemic chemotherapy. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

论文信息

作者
Stolz SM、von Wachter C、Willmann J、Rieger MJ、Kreutmair S、Mamozai W、Rösler W、Hockl P
第一作者单位
Department for Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.Switzerland
通讯作者单位
Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. michael.mayinger@usz.ch.Switzerland
期刊
Radiation oncology (London, England)2026 Mar 31
原文标识
PubMed 41917971 · DOI 10.1186/s13014-026-02822-z