研究概要
我们的研究结果揭示了晚期HCC中方案特异性的全身免疫机制:Atez/Bev扩增单核细胞-NK细胞毒性轴,而Dur/Tre增强单核细胞-T细胞炎症网络和TCR库多样性。这些见解突出了不同的预测性生物标志物,并支持HCC中按方案定制的免疫治疗。
研究思路结论见上方概要
背景
联合免疫治疗如 atezolizumab 联合 bevacizumab(Atez/Bev)和 durvalumab 联合 tremelimumab(Dur/Tre)可改善晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)的结局,但应答背后的系统性免疫机制仍未完全明确。
方法
我们对19例晚期HCC患者(Atez/Bev:5例缓解者(R),5例未缓解者(NR);Dur/Tre:4例R,5例NR)治疗前及治疗期间的外周血单个核细胞进行了单细胞RNA测序并结合CITE-seq,获得345 962个单细胞转录组,涵盖22个免疫细胞簇。分析包括转录谱分析、基因集富集分析、T细胞受体(TCR)库分析以及基于CellChat的细胞间通讯建模。
结果
基线比较揭示了不同病因下不同的全身免疫状态:非病毒性HCC表现出具有增强的细胞毒性和记忆相关特征的CD8 + T细胞。在Atez/Bev治疗下,应答者中的CD14 + 单核细胞被重编程为抗原呈递和淋巴细胞支持功能,而PRKCH + NK细胞获得了强大的细胞毒性程序,该程序通过ICAM-整合素和HLA-E-NKG2C轴由单核细胞-NK相互作用得到增强。相比之下,Dur/Tre应答者表现出CD14 + 单核细胞程序富集于炎症和干扰素驱动的抗原呈递,同时CD8 + 中央记忆T细胞转录重编程为效应准备状态,并与单核细胞有强烈的交互作用。TCR分析揭示了方案特异性差异:在Atez/Bev治疗下,克隆扩增的发生与应答无关,而Dur/Tre应答者则同时表现出克隆扩增和更高的治疗前CD8 + T细胞多样性,扩增的克隆显示出细胞毒性和干扰素反应性特征。治疗前免疫组成,包括Atez/Bev的naïve CD4 + T细胞和PRKCH + NK细胞以及Dur/Tre的常规树突状细胞,也预测了应答。
展开英文摘要原文
BACKGROUND: Combination immunotherapies such as atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) and durvalumab plus tremelimumab (Dur/Tre) improve outcomes in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), yet systemic immune mechanisms underlying response remain incompletely defined.
METHODS: We performed single-cell RNA sequencing with CITE-seq on peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 19 advanced HCC patients (Atez/Bev: 5 responders (R), 5 non-responders (NR); Dur/Tre: 4 R, 5 NR) before and during treatment, yielding 345 962 single-cell transcriptomes spanning 22 immune cell clusters. Analysis included transcriptional profiling, gene set enrichment analysis, T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire analysis, and CellChat-based intercellular communication modeling.
RESULTS: Baseline comparisons revealed distinct systemic immune states by etiology: non-viral HCC exhibited CD8 + T cells with heightened cytotoxic and memory-associated signatures. Under Atez/Bev, CD14 + monocytes in responders were reprogrammed toward antigen-presenting and lymphocyte-supporting functions, while PRKCH + NK cells acquired a robust cytotoxic program reinforced by monocyte-NK interactions via ICAM-integrin and HLA-E-NKG2C axes. In contrast, Dur/Tre responders exhibited CD14 + monocyte programs enriched in inflammatory and interferon-driven antigen presentation, alongside transcriptional reprogramming of CD8 + central memory T cells into an effector-ready state with strong crosstalk to monocytes. TCR analysis revealed regimen-specific differences: clonotype expansion occurred irrespective of response under Atez/Bev, whereas Dur/Tre responders showed both clonotype expansion and higher pretreatment CD8 + T cell diversity, with expanded clones displaying cytotoxic and interferon-responsive profiles. Pretreatment immune composition, including naïve CD4 + T cells and PRKCH + NK cells for Atez/Bev and conventional dendritic cells for Dur/Tre, also predicted response.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reveal regimen-specific systemic immune mechanisms in advanced HCC: Atez/Bev amplifies monocyte-NK cytotoxic axes, whereas Dur/Tre enhances monocyte-T cell inflammatory networks and TCR repertoire diversity. These insights highlight distinct predictive biomarkers and support regimen-tailored immunotherapy in HCC.
论文信息
- 作者
- Nishio A、Kodama T、Daiku K、Maesaka K、Tanaka S、Nozaki Y、Kurahashi T、Matsumoto K
- 第一作者单位
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan.Japan
- 通讯作者单位
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan t-kodama@gh.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.Japan
- 期刊
- Journal for immunotherapy of cancer2026 Mar 30