CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Locoregional delivery of CAR T cells in high-grade gliomas: a systematic analysis of safety, efficacy, and emerging biomarkers of response.
Locoregional delivery of CAR T cells in high-grade gliomas: a systematic analysis of safety, efficacy, and emerging biomarkers of response.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
CAR-T 细胞的颅内递送有助于克服限制脑肿瘤全身治疗疗效和安全性的关键障碍。这些发现支持一种范式转变,即将局部区域递送技术整合为未来 CAR-T 细胞试验设计的关键组成部分,为 HGG 患者提供一种更安全且可能更有效的治疗方法,并带来更多纵向采样的机会。
CAR-T 细胞疗法代表着肿瘤学中一个极具前景的前沿领域,但其在高级别胶质瘤(HGG)中的应用受到血脑屏障、疗效有限以及全身给药相关显著毒性的挑战。局部区域给药有潜力解决这些不足。本系统综述评估了局部区域 vs 全身 CAR-T 细胞给药治疗 HGG 的安全性与有效性。
遵循 PRISMA(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses)指南,2015 年至 2024 年间从三个独立数据库中识别出共 112 项研究。其中,19 篇文章接受了资格评估,最终有 16 篇文章符合纳入标准,涉及 14 项临床试验中的 194 例接受治疗的患者。进行了一项比较性 meta 分析,以比较局部区域给药(如脑室内、瘤内)与全身(静脉)给药的安全性和疗效结局。汇总严重(3 级)不良事件发生率和治疗反应,以计算粗发生率、率比以及带 95% CI 的相对风险(RRs)。使用固定效应模型和随机效应模型评估发生率比。
局部区域给药与显著改善的安全性特征相关,与全身输注相比,3级不良事件发生率降低超过60%(RR=0.39;95% CI 0.30至0.52;p<0.001)。此外,局部区域策略显示出令人鼓舞的抗肿瘤活性信号,包括全身给药方式中未广泛观察到的疾病缓解率(RR=3.79;95% CI 1.23至11.70;p<0.05)。局部区域给药还使得能够通过分析脑脊液来监测T细胞运输及新出现的免疫激活生物标志物。
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy represents a promising frontier in oncology, but its application to high-grade gliomas (HGG) is challenged by the blood-brain barrier, limited efficacy, and significant toxicities associated with systemic administration. Locoregional delivery has the potential to address these shortcomings. This systematic review evaluates the safety and efficacy of locoregional vs systemic CAR-T cell delivery for HGG.
Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a total of 112 studies were identified from three separate databases between 2015 and 2024. Of these, 19 articles were assessed for eligibility, resulting in 16 articles meeting the inclusion criteria with 194 treated patients across 14 clinical trials. A comparative meta-analysis was performed to compare the safety and efficacy outcomes of locoregional administration (eg, intracerebroventricular, intratumoral) with systemic (intravenous) delivery. Severe (grade 3) adverse event rates and therapeutic responses were pooled to calculate crude incidence, rate ratios, and relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs. Both fixed-effect and random-effects models were used to evaluate incidence rate ratios.
Locoregional delivery was associated with a markedly improved safety profile, demonstrating an over 60% reduction in the incidence of grade 3 adverse events compared with systemic infusion (RR=0.39; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.52; p<0.001). Furthermore, locoregional strategies demonstrated encouraging signals of antitumor activity, including rates of disease responses not widely observed with systemic approaches (RR=3.79; 95% CI 1.23 to 11.70; p<0.05). Locoregional delivery also enables the analysis of cerebrospinal fluid to monitor T-cell trafficking and emerging biomarkers of immune activation.
Intracranial delivery of CAR-T cells helps overcome key barriers that limit the efficacy and safety of systemic therapy in brain tumors. These findings support a paradigm shift that integrates locoregional delivery techniques as a pivotal component in the design of future CAR-T cell trials, offering a safer and potentially more effective therapeutic approach with greater opportunities for longitudinal sampling for patients with HGG.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。