← 返回

已获批细胞疗法和双特异性抗体在实体瘤中的疗效与安全性:现状

英文原题:Efficacy and safety of approved cellular therapies and bispecific antibodies in solid tumors: the current state.

查看英文原题

Efficacy and safety of approved cellular therapies and bispecific antibodies in solid tumors: the current state.

PubMed 2026/03/17(内容时间) Discov Oncol Q3 · IF 2.8(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

癌症免疫治疗是一个广义术语,包括裸抗体、双特异性抗体(BsAbs)、免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)、CAR-T 细胞疗法、癌症疫苗、活化免疫细胞和异基因造血细胞移植。近年来,免疫参与T细胞疗法的进展使各种癌症类型的新疗法取得了显著进展,延长了患者生存期,主要是在血液系统恶性肿瘤患者中。几种CAR-T 细胞构建体和BsAbs已在全球范围内获得监管机构批准,用于复发性、难治性白血病、非霍奇金淋巴瘤和多发性骨髓瘤。实体瘤的特征是免疫抑制性、纤维炎症性肿瘤微环境(TME)和免疫抑制细胞,如调节性T细胞(Tregs)、髓源性抑制细胞(MDSCs)和肿瘤相关巨噬细胞(TAMs)。这与肿瘤内在因素(肿瘤抗原异质性、靶抗原丢失、瘤床内缺氧以及预先存在的TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)[TILs]不足)等挑战以及治疗相关障碍如靶向非肿瘤毒性相结合,阻碍了跨实体瘤类型的持久免疫参与T细胞疗法的发展。

然而,最近有几种BsAbs、TILs和自体工程化T细胞受体(TCR)疗法已在各适应症中获得批准,为实体瘤细胞治疗领域开辟了新视野。

在此,我们综述了迄今为止美国食品药品监督管理局批准的实体瘤细胞疗法和BsAbs的疗效和安全性可用数据。这些包括BsAbs、TILs和TCR疗法。鉴于缺乏针对实体瘤中TCE疗法的统一临床实践指南,我们讨论并比较了五种疗法的疗效和安全性。

我们进一步介绍了跨实体瘤的治疗管线,并讨论了目前正在研究中的策略,以优化T细胞亚群,从而增强抗肿瘤疗效,同时改善安全性特征。

展开英文摘要原文

Cancer immunotherapy is a broad term including naked antibodies, bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, cancer vaccines, activated immune cells, and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Recent advances in immune-engaging T-cell therapies have led to significant progress in novel treatments across various cancer types, resulting in prolonged patient survival, mainly in patients with hematologic malignancies. Several CAR T-cell constructs and BsAbs have been approved by regulatory authorities worldwide for relapsed, refractory leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and multiple myeloma.

Solid tumors are characterized by an immunosuppressive, fibroinflammatory tumor microenvironment (TME) and immune-suppressive cells, such as regulatory T-cells (Tregs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs).

This, coupled with challenges such as tumor-intrinsic factors (tumor antigen heterogeneity, target antigen loss, hypoxia within the tumor bed, and insufficient preexisting tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes [TILs]) and therapy-related hurdles like on-target off-tumor toxicity, impedes the development of durable immune-engaging T-cell therapies across solid tumor types.

However, a few BsAbs, TILs, and autologous-engineered T-cell receptor (TCR) therapies have recently been approved across indications, paving the way for newer horizons in the solid tumor cellular therapy landscape.

Here, we review the available data on the efficacy and safety of cellular therapies and BsAbs in solid tumors approved thus far by the U. S. Food and Drug Administration. These include BsAbs, TILs, and TCR therapy. Given the lack of homogeneous clinical practice guidelines for TCE therapies in solid tumors, we discuss and compare the efficacy and safety of five therapies.

We further present the therapeutic pipeline across solid tumors and discuss strategies currently under investigation to optimize T-cell subsets to enhance antitumor efficacy while improving the safety profile.

论文信息

作者
Jafry RZ、Qamar SB、Irfan S、Abid MA、Mohlere V、Maithel N、Jafri SH、Awasthi S
第一作者单位
The Aga Khan University School of Medicine, Karachi, Pakistan.
通讯作者单位
Department of Hematology/Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA. bilal_abid@hotmail.com.United States
文献类型
综述
期刊
Discover oncology2026 Mar 17
原文标识
PubMed 41843290 · DOI 10.1007/s12672-026-04802-x