← 返回

英国套细胞淋巴瘤患者接受 brexucabtagene autoleucel 前的桥接实践:模式、缓解、毒性和生存分析

英文原题:Bridging practices prior to brexucabtagene autoleucel for mantle cell lymphoma in the United Kingdom: An analysis of modality, response, toxicity and survival.

查看英文原题

Bridging practices prior to brexucabtagene autoleucel for mantle cell lymphoma in the United Kingdom: An analysis of modality, response, toxicity and survival.

PubMed 2026/03/08(内容时间) Br J Haematol Q2 · IF 3.6(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

在套细胞淋巴瘤(MCL)中,brexucabtagene autoleucel(brexu-cel)前的桥接治疗(BT)证据有限。

在此,我们报告了英国15个中心176例患者的BT方式和结局。90%(158/176)的患者接受了BT,其中大多数接受标准化疗+/-放疗(53%)(SD化疗+/-RT)或单独靶向治疗(TT)(23%)。临床医生更倾向于对东部肿瘤协作组体能状态(ECOG PS)为1、母细胞样病变、肿块>5 cm和乳酸脱氢酶升高的患者使用SD化疗+/-RT。总体缓解率(ORR)为46%。SD化疗+/-RT的ORR更高(58%),尤其是R-BAC(64%)。尽管接受BT但仍出现疾病进展与brexu-cel的ORR较低相关(77% vs. 91%,p = 0.03),且≥3级ICANS风险更高(OR 3.43,95% CI 1.44-8.10,p = 0.01)。与单独TT相比,SD化疗+/-RT与≥3级中性粒细胞减少(第1个月)、≥3级血小板减少(第1个月、第3个月)和早期非复发死亡(<90天,13% vs. 0%)的发生率更高相关。BT方式或缓解均未影响输注后的无进展生存期或总生存期。在选择BT方案前应优先审查造血储备、严格管理输注后延迟性血细胞减少,并开发更有效且可耐受的BT。

展开英文摘要原文

Bridging therapy (BT) prior to brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel) in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is supported by limited evidence.

Here, we report BT modality and outcome in 176 patients at 15 centres in the United Kingdom. BT was delivered to 90% (158/176), the majority receiving standard chemotherapy +/- radiotherapy (53%) (SD chemo +/- RT) or targeted therapy (TT) alone (23%). Clinicians favoured SD chemo +/- RT in those with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) of 1, blastoid disease, bulk >5 cm and elevated lactate dehydrogenase.

Overall response rate (ORR) was 46%. Higher ORR was observed with SD chemo +/- RT (58%), particularly R-BAC (64%). Progressive disease despite BT was associated with a lower ORR to brexu-cel (77% vs. 91%, p = 0. 03) and a higher risk of ≥grade 3 ICANS (OR 3. 43, 95% CI 1. 44-8. 10, p = 0. 01). SD chemo +/- RT was associated with a higher incidence of ≥grade 3 neutropenia (Month 1), ≥grade 3 thrombocytopenia (Month 1, Month 3) and early non-relapse mortality (<90 days, 13% vs.

0%) compared to TT alone. Neither BT modality nor response impacted progression-free or overall survival post-infusion. Review of haematopoietic reserve prior to the selection of BT regimen, rigorous management of delayed cytopenia post-infusion and more effective and tolerable BT should be prioritised.

论文信息

作者
O'Reilly MA、Wilson W、Maybury B、Kuhnl A、Roddie C、Uttenthal B、Johnson R、Alajangi R
第一作者单位
Department of Haematology, University College London Hospital, London, UK.United Kingdom
通讯作者单位
Department of Haematology, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.United Kingdom
文献类型
多中心研究
期刊
British journal of haematology2026 Apr
原文标识
PubMed 41796018 · DOI 10.1111/bjh.70357