CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Predictors and responses to varying durations of BTK inhibitor bridging therapy before anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL.
Predictors and responses to varying durations of BTK inhibitor bridging therapy before anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
尽管存在初始差异,延长 BTKi 桥接可能改善复发/难治性弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者对 CAR-T 细胞治疗的总体缓解。
靶向CD19的嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法显示出治疗复发/难治性(R/R)弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的临床潜力,但如何提高疗效仍是重大挑战。为此,研究者正在评估布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(BTKi),如伊布替尼或泽布替尼,作为桥接治疗以改善结局。
本回顾性分析评估了33例R/R DLBCL患者在接受抗CD19 CAR-T 细胞输注前,不同持续时间BTKi桥接治疗的影响。患者符合预先设定的纳入标准,包括至少存在一项高危预后因素。根据BTKi暴露时间将患者分为两组:x个月组与<2个月组。
接受BTKi治疗o个月的R/R DLBCL患者总体缓解率高于接受BTKi治疗<2个月的患者。两组无进展生存期(PFS)或总生存期(OS)差异均无统计学意义。探索性分析提示,烟酰胺磷酸核糖转移酶(NAMPT)和程序性细胞死亡蛋白1(PD-1)的调节可能是BTKi桥接疗效的潜在生物标志物。
延长BTKi桥接治疗可能提高R/R DLBCL患者CAR-T 细胞疗法的总体缓解率,但延长使用BTKi相关的血液学毒性风险需予以关注。仍需进一步研究以验证这些观察结果并推动其临床转化,凸显该领域继续研究的必要性。 临床试验注册:https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=33185,ChiCTR1800019622。
Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has demonstrated clinical potential in treating relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL); however, enhancing its therapeutic efficacy remains a significant challenge. To this end, bridging therapy with Brutonyg tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi), such as ibrutinib or zanubrutinib, is being investigated as a strategy to improve treatment outcomes.
In this retrospective analysis, we assessed the impact of different durations of BTKi bridging therapy prior to anti-CD19 CAR-T cell infusion in 33 patients with R/R DLBCL. Patients meeting predefined eligibility criteria, including the presence of at least one high-risk prognostic factor. These 33 patients were stratified into two groups based on the duration of BTKi exposure: x months versus <2 months.
The R/R DLBCL patients receiving BTKi for o months demonstrated a higher overall response rate than the patients receiving BTKi for <2 month. There was no statistically significant differences in progression free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) between the two groups. Exploratory analyses suggested potential biomarkers for BTKi bridging efficacy, including modulation of nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (NAMPT) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1).
Prolonged BTKi bridging might improve the overall response to CAR-T cell therapy in patients with R/R DLBCL, despite the initial disparities. However, the risk of hematological toxicity associated with extended BTKi use requires attention. Further investigations are essential to validate and translate these observations into clinical practice, thus highlighting the need for further research in this area. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=33185, ChiCTR1800019622.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。