肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:CD19 CAR T-cell outcomes in relapsed/refractory extramedullary B-ALL: a multisite, retrospective cohort review.
CD19 CAR T-cell outcomes in relapsed/refractory extramedullary B-ALL: a multisite, retrospective cohort review.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
CD19 CAR-T 细胞(CD19-CAR)可有效清除骨髓(BM)B 细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病(B-ALL),但缺乏治疗髓外白血病的疗效数据。
我们开展了一项多中心、回顾性研究,纳入 308 例接受 CD19-CAR 治疗的儿童和年轻成人,并报告了输注时存在活动性中枢神经系统(CNS)疾病(CNS 队列,n = 36)、活动性非 CNS 髓外疾病(EMD;n = 21)或孤立性 BM 疾病(iBM;n = 251)患者的疗效。iBM、EMD 和 CNS 队列的 24 个月总生存期(OS)分别为 71.5%(95% 置信区间 [CI],66.0-77.6)、66.7%(95% CI,49.3-90.2)和 57.0%(95% CI,42.6-76.3)(P = .032);相应的无事件生存期(EFS)分别为 51.8%(95% CI,45.8-58.6)、45.8%(95% CI,28.2-74.4)和 35.2%(95% CI,22.4-55.3)(P = .035)。
所有孤立性 EMD 患者(n = 5)均达到完全缓解且未复发。10 例孤立性 CNS 疾病患者中有 8 例(80%)CNS 得到清除,其中 3 例(37.5%)随后复发。与低 BM 疾病负荷(LD)相比,合并 EMD 或 CNS 疾病且高 BM 疾病负荷(HD)与更差的结局相关,OS 方面(EMD-HD,41.7% vs EMD-LD,100%;P = .005;CNS-HD,33.3% vs CNS-LD,92.3%;P = .001),EFS 方面(EMD-HD,8.3% vs EMD-LD,100%;P< .001;CNS-HD,14.3% vs CNS-LD,63.6%;P< .001)。
总之,CD19-CAR 可能是伴有活动性 EMD 或 CNS 疾病的复发/难治性 B-ALL 的有效选择,但合并 HD 预示结局较差,提示应考虑加强输注前评估和治疗。
CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CD19-CAR) are effective at eradicating bone marrow (BM) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), but efficacy data for the treatment of extramedullary leukemia are lacking.
We conducted a multisite, retrospective review of 308 children and young adults who received CD19-CAR and report efficacy in patients with active central nervous system (CNS) disease (CNS cohort, n = 36), active non-CNS extramedullary disease (EMD; n = 21), or isolated BM disease (iBM; n = 251) at infusion. The overall survival (OS) at 24 months in the iBM, EMD, and CNS cohorts was 71. 5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 66. 0-77. 6), 66. 7% (95% CI, 49. 3-90. 2), and 57. 0% (95% CI, 42. 6-76. 3), respectively (P = . 032); the corresponding event-free survival (EFS) was 51. 8% (95% CI, 45. 8-58. 6), 45. 8% (95% CI, 28. 2-74. 4), and 35. 2% (95% CI, 22. 4-55. 3) (P = . 035). All patients with isolated EMD (n = 5) achieved complete response and did not relapse.
Eight patients (80%) with isolated CNS disease (n = 10) had clearing of the CNS, and 3 (37. 5%) subsequently relapsed. Concurrent EMD or CNS disease with high BM disease burden (HD) was associated with inferior outcomes when compared with low BM disease burden (LD) in terms of OS (EMD-HD, 41. 7% vs EMD-LD, 100%; P = . 005; CNS-HD, 33. 3% vs CNS-LD, 92.
3%; P = . 001) and EFS (EMD-HD, 8. 3% vs EMD-LD, 100%; P< . 001; CNS-HD, 14. 3% vs CNS-LD, 63. 6%; P< . 001). In summary, CD19-CAR may be an effective option for relapsed/refractory B-ALL with active EMD or CNS disease, but concurrent HD predicts inferior outcomes, prompting consideration of enhanced preinfusion evaluation and treatment.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。