← 返回

小鼠肝细胞癌部分冷冻消融前的新辅助 PD-1 抑制可调节肿瘤微环境向有利的免疫特征转化

英文原题:Neoadjuvant PD-1 Inhibition prior to Partial Cryoablation of Murine Hepatocellular Carcinoma Modulates the Tumor Microenvironment toward Favorable Immunological Profiles.

查看英文原题

Neoadjuvant PD-1 Inhibition prior to Partial Cryoablation of Murine Hepatocellular Carcinoma Modulates the Tumor Microenvironment toward Favorable Immunological Profiles.

PubMed 2026/02/12(内容时间) J Vasc Interv Radiol Q2 · IF 3.1(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

在 HCC 小鼠模型中,新辅助 PD-1 免疫检查点抑制可以调节冷冻消融后观察到的免疫抑制性肿瘤微环境。这突显了联合治疗在治疗早期和晚期 HCC 方面的潜力。

研究思路结论见上方概要

评估新辅助系统性PD-1免疫检查点抑制对TIB-75小鼠肝细胞癌(HCC)模型中部分冷冻消融后残留肿瘤局部免疫反应的影响。

48只BALB/c小鼠(6-12周)原位植入TIB-75细胞以诱导单个HCC病灶。小鼠随机分为4个治疗组:(a)对照组,(b)anti-PD-1组,(c)部分冷冻消融组,以及(d)anti-PD-1联合部分冷冻消融组。接种后第7、9和11天给予anti-PD-1,随后第13天进行部分冷冻消融,第18天 harvest 肿瘤。通过免疫组化组织病理学分析评估T细胞亚群(CD3+、CD4+和CD8+)、肿瘤相关巨噬细胞(CD68+和CD206+)、PD-1和PD-L1的存在。使用QuPath测定肿瘤内阳性染色细胞的百分比。

接受抗PD-1治疗的小鼠(n = 12)残余肿瘤中CD3 +、CD4 + 和CD8 + T细胞浸润多于对照组(CD3 +:中位数,22.4% vs 5.5% [P < .001];CD4 +:中位数,19.8% vs 5.1% [P < .001];CD8 +:中位数,8.2% vs 3.1% [P = .007])。单独部分冷冻消融(n = 12)增加了CD206 + M2样巨噬细胞(中位数,36.6% vs 14.7%;P = .03)。部分冷冻消融联合新辅助抗PD-1(n = 12)显示CD3 + T细胞浸润显著高于单独部分冷冻消融(n = 12)(中位数,14.3% vs 4.5%;P = .048),且PD-1表达显著低于单独抗PD-1(中位数,2.9% vs 7.3%;P = .004)。

展开英文摘要原文

To evaluate the impact of neoadjuvant systemic PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibition on the local immune response in residual tumors following partial cryoablation in a TIB-75 murine hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) model.

Forty-eight BALB/c mice (6-12 weeks) were orthotopically implanted with TIB-75 cells to induce a single lesion of HCC. Mice were randomized into 4 treatment groups: (a) control, (b) anti-PD-1, (c) partial cryoablation, and (d) anti-PD-1 and partial cryoablation. Anti-PD-1 was administered on Days 7, 9, and 11 after inoculation, followed by partial cryoablation on Day 13 and tumor harvest on Day 18. The presence of T cell subsets (CD3 + , CD4 + , and CD8 + ), tumor-associated macrophages (CD68 + and CD206 + ), PD-1, and PD-L1 were assessed by histopathological analysis of immunohistochemistry. The percentage of positively stained cells within the tumor was determined using QuPath.

Mice treated with anti-PD-1 (n = 12) had greater infiltration of CD3 + , CD4 + , and CD8 + T cells into residual tumors than control (CD3 + : median, 22.4% vs 5.5% [P < .001]; CD4 + : median, 19.8% vs 5.1% [P < .001]; CD8 + : median, 8.2% vs 3.1% [P = .007]). Partial cryoablation alone (n = 12) increased CD206 + M2-like macrophages (median, 36.6% vs 14.7%; P = .03). Partial cryoablation combined with neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 (n = 12) showed significantly higher infiltration of CD3 + T cells (median, 14.3% vs 4.5%; P = .048) than partial cryoablation alone (n = 12) and significantly lower PD-1 expression than anti-PD-1 alone (median, 2.9% vs 7.3%; P = .004).

In a mouse model of HCC, neoadjuvant PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibition can modulate the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment observed after cryoablation. This highlights the potential of a combination therapy to treat both early- and advanced-stage HCCs.

论文信息

作者
Kao T、Santana JG、Meister E、Shewarega A、Israel J、Peschke LMH、Tefera J、Matuschewski N
第一作者单位
Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Radiology, Charit&#xe9; - Universit&#xe4;tsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universit&#xe4;t Berlin and Humboldt-Universit&#xe4;t, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health at Charit&#xe9; - Universit&#xe4;tsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.United States
通讯作者单位
Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Internal Medicine, Section for Digestive Diseases, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address: julius.chapiro@yale.edu.United States
文献类型
美国 NIH 资助研究
期刊
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR2026 May
原文标识
PubMed 41690670 · DOI 10.1016/j.jvir.2026.108585