← 返回

tisagenlecleucel 与自体干细胞移植相比在复发/难治性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者中带来更优的患者报告健康相关生活质量

英文原题:Tisagenlecleucel yields superior patient-reported health-related quality of life compared to autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphomas.

查看英文原题

Tisagenlecleucel yields superior patient-reported health-related quality of life compared to autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphomas.

PubMed 2026/02/05(内容时间) Ann Hematol Q3 · IF 2.3(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法已成为复发/难治性大B细胞淋巴瘤(rr LBCL)的既定治疗,但尽管临床疗效证据充分,关于健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的数据仍有限。

本研究比较了CAR-T 细胞治疗与大剂量化疗联合自体干细胞移植(HD-ASCT)后长期缓解患者的HRQoL。研究分析28例持续缓解的rr LBCL患者,其中15例于2019至2023年接受CAR-T 细胞治疗(替沙仑赛),13例接受HD-ASCT。采用EQ-5D-5L和PROMIS-29问卷,在细胞治疗后12个月及中位36.8个月(范围15.7–57.2个月)评估HRQoL,并比较两组指标和各领域得分。患者中位年龄63.5岁(范围23–73岁)。治疗后12个月,CAR-T 组报告的HRQoL得分显著高于HD-ASCT组(EQ-5D-5L指数:0.89±0.11比0.72±0.21;P=0.015)。PROMIS-29结果一致显示,CAR-T 组在全部七个维度均具有临床意义上的优势。较晚随访时,EQ-5D-5L指数趋于接近(0.82±0.22比0.70±0.25;P=0.2),但PROMIS-29仍显示CAR-T 组在五个维度持续获益。与HD-ASCT相比,CAR-T 细胞治疗在第一年与更好的HRQoL相关。尽管部分差异随时间缩小,CAR-T 患者在多个维度仍有较好结局。这些发现凸显患者报告结局在rr LBCL中的临床意义,尤其是在纵向随访中,并强调治疗决策应纳入以患者为中心的指标。

展开英文摘要原文

Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is an established treatment for relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (rr LBCL). While clinical efficacy is well documented, data on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) remain limited.

This study assessed HRQoL in rr LBCL patients with long-term remission after CAR T-cell therapy versus high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (HD-ASCT). Twenty-eight consecutive rr LBCL patients in sustained remission were analyzed, with 15 receiving CAR T-cell therapy (tisagenlecleucel) and 13 undergoing HD-ASCT between 2019 and 2023. HRQoL was assessed using EQ-5D-5 L and PROMIS-29 questionnaires at 12 months and at a median of 36. 8 months (range 15. 7-57. 2 months) post cellular therapy. Groups were compared for differences in HRQoL indices and domain scores. Median age was 63. 5 (range 23-73) years.

Twelve months post-treatment, CAR T-cell recipients reported significantly higher HRQoL scores than HD-ASCT patients (EQ-5D-5 L index value: 0. 89 0. 11 vs. 0. 72 0. 21; p = 0. 015). Consistently, PROMIS-29 revealed clinically meaningful advantages in the CAR T-cell cohort across all seven categories. At later follow-up, EQ-5D-5 L index values converged (index-value 0.

82 0. 22 vs. 0. 7 0. 25; p = 0. 2), whereas PROMIS-29 still indicated sustained benefit in five domains among CAR T-cell recipients. CAR T-cell therapy was associated with superior HRQoL in the first year compared to HD-ASCT. Although some differences diminished over time, CAR T-cell patients continued to experience better outcomes in several domains.

These findings highlight clinical relevance of patient-reported outcome in rr LBCL, particularly in longitudinal surveys, and underscore the value of integrating patient-centered metrics into therapeutic decisions-making.

论文信息

作者
Obstfelder E、Herrmann J、Vučinić V、Hochhaus A、Schnetzke U、Eigendorff F
第一作者单位
Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Abteilung für Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.Germany
通讯作者单位
Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Abteilung für Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany. Farina.Eigendorff@med.uni-jena.de.Germany
文献类型
对照研究
期刊
Annals of hematology2026 Feb 5
原文标识
PubMed 41639434 · DOI 10.1007/s00277-026-06840-5