CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Bispecific Antibodies Versus Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Comparative Narrative Review of Efficacy, Safety, and Accessibility.
Bispecific Antibodies Versus Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Comparative Narrative Review of Efficacy, Safety, and Accessibility.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
本综述为临床医生提供了全面的比较,以支持复发/难治性 DLBCL 的循证治疗选择。
本叙述性综述从作用机制、临床疗效、安全性、物流、成本及可及性等多个方面比较这些疗法。
CAR-T 疗法显示持久完全缓解率为40%–60%,无进展生存期延长(中位11–12.5个月),但受制于制备复杂、成本高和可能出现的严重毒性。相比之下,BsAb可即刻提供现货型治疗,具有良好疗效和更优安全性,适合门诊给药,但其长期持久性仍在研究中。
本综述为临床医生提供全面比较,以支持rel/ref DLBCL的循证治疗选择。
This narrative review compares these therapies across multiple domains, including mechanisms of action, clinical efficacy, safety profiles, logistics, cost, and accessibility.
CAR T therapies have demonstrated durable complete response rates (40%-60%) and extended progression-free survival (median 11-12.5 months), but they are limited by complex manufacturing, high cost, and potentially severe toxicities. In contrast, BsAbs offer immediate, off-the-shelf availability, with promising efficacy and a more favorable safety profile that enables outpatient administration, although long-term durability remains under investigation.
This review provides clinicians with a comprehensive comparison to support evidence-based treatment selection in rel/ref DLBCL.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。