← 返回

早期结外 NK/T 细胞淋巴瘤的风险适应性联合模式治疗:基于马尔可夫模型的成本-效果分析

英文原题:Risk-Adapted Combined-Modality Therapy in Early-Stage Extranodal Natural Killer-/T-Cell Lymphoma: A Markov Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

查看英文原题

Risk-Adapted Combined-Modality Therapy in Early-Stage Extranodal Natural Killer-/T-Cell Lymphoma: A Markov Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

PubMed 2026/01/15(内容时间) JCO Glob Oncol Q2 · IF 3.8(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

CMT 对低危患者不太可能具有成本效益,但对高危和极高危患者极可能具有成本效益。至于中低危或中高危患者,CMT 的成本效益取决于时间范围和支付意愿阈值。

研究思路结论见上方概要

联合模式治疗(CMT)较单纯放疗(RT)可改善早期结外自然杀伤/T细胞淋巴瘤(ENKTCL)患者的生存。然而,对于列线图修订风险指数(NRI)定义的低危患者,其效果并不充分。因此,生存获益是否超过额外成本仍不明确。

构建了一个Markov模型,根据NRI模型定义的五个风险组,比较早期ENKTCL患者接受CMT与单纯RT治疗的效果。转移概率、有效性和成本数据来自中国淋巴瘤协作组队列,而健康效用数据则根据不良反应估算。从中国支付方的角度计算了生命年、成本、质量调整生命年(QALYs)和增量成本效果比。针对特定国家或环境的评估可通过一个基于网络的工具完成。

在6年时间范围内,CMT在低风险(NRI = 0)、中低风险(NRI = 1)、中高风险(NRI = 2)、高风险(NRI = 3)和极高风险(NRI = 4)组中分别增加了5.47、5.19、4.82、4.62和4.49个生命年,成本分别为517,472美元(USD)/QALY、22,871美元/QALY、7,865美元/QALY、4,598美元/QALY和2,278美元/QALY。在5,208美元/QALY的支付意愿阈值下,各风险组的成本效益概率分别为0.00%、0.01%、7.40%、72.07%和99.10%。在终生时间范围内,除低风险组外,所有风险组具有成本效益的概率均超过90%。估计值因国家设置而异,并通过基于网络的自定义分析进行了整合。

展开英文摘要原文

Combined-modality therapy (CMT) improves survival in patients with early-stage extranodal natural killer-/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTCL) compared with radiotherapy (RT) alone. However, the effect is inadequate for low-risk patients as defined by nomogram-revised risk index (NRI). As such, it remains unclear whether the survival benefits outweigh the additional costs.

A Markov model was constructed to compare CMT versus RT alone for patients with early-stage ENKTCL, according to five risk groups defined by NRI model. Transition probabilities, effectiveness, and cost data were derived from the China Lymphoma Collaborative Group cohort, while health utility data were estimated from adverse effects. Life-years, costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated from the perspective of Chinese payers. Evaluations for customized countries or settings can be accomplished using a web-based tool.

Over the 6-year horizon, CMT increased life-years by 5.47, 5.19, 4.82, 4.62, and 4.49 years at $517,472 US dollars (USD)/QALY, $22,871 USD/QALY, $7,865 USD/QALY, $4,598 USD/QALY, and $2,278 USD/QALY for the low-risk (NRI = 0), intermediate-low-risk (NRI = 1), intermediate-high-risk (NRI = 2), high-risk (NRI = 3), and very high-risk (NRI = 4) groups, respectively. The probabilities of cost-effectiveness at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $5,208 USD/QALY were 0.00%, 0.01%, 7.40%, 72.07%, and 99.10% for each risk group. Over the lifetime horizon, all risk groups, except for low-risk group, had a probability of over 90% of being cost-effective. Estimates were varied according to country settings, integrated through a web-based customized analysis.

CMT is unlikely to be cost-effective for low-risk patients but highly likely to be cost-effective for high-risk and very high-risk patients. As for intermediate-low or intermediate-high-risk patients, the cost-effectiveness of CMT varies depending on the time horizon and willingness-to-pay threshold.

论文信息

作者
Yang J、Zhong QZ、Qian LT、Yang Y、Hou XR、Qiao XY、Wang H、Zhu Y
单位
National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.China
文献类型
非美国政府资助研究
期刊
JCO global oncology2026 Jan
原文标识
PubMed 41538755 · DOI 10.1200/GO-24-00435