← 返回

塞利尼索联合 R-GDP 作为复发/难治性弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤挽救治疗

英文原题:Selinexor combined with R-GDP as salvage therapy in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

查看英文原题

Selinexor combined with R-GDP as salvage therapy in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

PubMed 2025/12/25(内容时间) Am J Cancer Res Q2 · IF 3.1(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

复发/难治性弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(R/R DLBCL)仍是治疗难题,预后不佳。本研究回顾性评估selinexor(一种选择性核输出蛋白XPO1抑制剂)联合R-GDP(利妥昔单抗、吉西他滨、地塞米松和顺铂)作为二线挽救治疗的疗效和安全性。纳入2023年1月至8月复旦大学附属肿瘤医院治疗的22例R/R DLBCL患者。患者计划接受3个周期selinexor联合R-GDP,随后根据情况接受大剂量化疗和自体干细胞移植(ASCT)、抗CD19CAR-T 细胞治疗或其他方案。中位随访25.5个月时,该方案总体缓解率为52.4%。OS中位数为26.9个月(95% CI:12.1个月至未达到),1年和2年OS率分别为67.6%和52.3%;PFS中位数为7.7个月(95% CI:2.27个月至未达到)。

后续治疗显著影响生存:桥接至ASCT或CAR-T 治疗者较接受其他治疗者OS(P=0.0217)和PFS(P=0.0029)更长。ASCT组OS中位数未达到;CAR-T 组为26.9个月(95% CI:15.9个月至未达到);其他治疗组为11.2个月(95% CI:10.2个月至未达到)。ASCT或CAR-T 组PFS中位数均未达到;其他治疗组为2.2个月(95% CI:2.1个月至未达到)。复发患者PFS中位数显著长于原发难治患者(未达到比2.82个月;95% CI:2.17个月至未达到;P=0.0072),两组OS无显著差异(P=0.2323)。常见不良事件包括血小板减少(100%)、疲劳(59%)、中性粒细胞减少(45%)、贫血(45%)和肺炎(23%),通过支持治疗或暂时停药可管理。真实世界分析显示该联合方案对R/R DLBCL疗效中等,并凸显优化后续ASCT或CAR-T 治疗顺序的重要性。

展开英文摘要原文

Relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) remains a therapeutic challenge with poor prognosis. Selinexor, a selective inhibitor of nuclear export (XPO1), has shown activity in this setting.

We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of selinexor combined with R-GDP (rituximab, gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin) as second-line therapy in 22 patients with R/R DLBCL treated at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center between January 2023 and August 2023. Patients were scheduled to receive 3 cycles of selinexor plus R-GDP, and subsequently followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, or alternative regimens, as appropriate. At a median follow-up of 25. 5 months, the selinexor plus R-GDP regimen yielded an overall response rate of 52. 4% in patients with R/R DLBCL. The median overall survival (OS) was 26.

9 months (95% CI, 12. 1-not reached), with 1- and 2-year OS rates of 67. 6% and 52. 3%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7. 7 months (95% CI, 2. 27-not reached). Survival outcomes were significantly influenced by subsequent therapy: patients bridged to ASCT or CAR-T therapy had significantly longer OS ( P =0. 0217) and PFS ( P =0.

0029) than those receiving other treatments. The median OS was not reached in the ASCT group, 26. 9 months (95% CI, 15. 9-not reached) in the CAR-T group, and 11. 2 months (95% CI, 10. 2-not reached) in patients receiving other therapies. The median PFS was not reached for ASCT or CAR-T group, compared with 2. 2 months (95% CI, 2. 1-not reached) in patients receiving other therapies.

Additionally, patients with relapsed disease exhibited a significantly longer median PFS than those with primary refractory disease (not reached vs 2. 82 months, [95% CI, 2. 17-not reached]; P =0. 0072). No significant difference in OS was observed between these two groups ( P =0. 2323).

Common adverse events included thrombocytopenia (100%), fatigue (59%), neutropenia (45%), anemia (45%), and pneumonia (23%), while were manageable through supportive care or temporary dose interruption. In this real-world analysis, selinexor combined with R-GDP demonstrated modest efficacy in R/R DLBCL, while highlighting the importance of optimizing subsequent sequencing with ASCT or CAR-T therapy.

论文信息

作者
Jiang S、Li Y、Liu C、Liu Y、Zhang Q、Lv F、Zhang W
单位
Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center Shanghai 200032, China.China
期刊
American journal of cancer research2025
原文标识
PubMed 41523246 · DOI 10.62347/RKWU3795