CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Multicenter real-life evaluation of the Post-CAR prognostic index for patients with large B-cell lymphoma after CAR-T failure.
Multicenter real-life evaluation of the Post-CAR prognostic index for patients with large B-cell lymphoma after CAR-T failure.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
CAR-T 治疗后进展的大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)患者多数生存不佳,且缺乏标准治疗策略,因此需要预后工具指导复发后的决策。Iacoboni等人近期提出CAR后预后指数(PC-PI),综合5项常规临床变量对CAR-T 失败后的结局分层:ECOG评分>0、血红蛋白<10 g/dL、LDH≥正常上限2倍、结外受累部位>1处,以及CAR-T 至疾病进展时间<4个月。
本研究在意大利淋巴瘤基金会网络16家中心开展回顾性多中心研究,评估PC-PI;纳入2019—2023年接受axicabtagene ciloleucel或tisagenlecleucel后复发或难治的125例LBCL患者。OS中位数为4.9个月,6个月和12个月OS率分别为44.9%和28.5%。PC-PI有效区分预后:高危组OS中位数1.8个月,中高危组2.2个月,中低危组8.7个月;低危组OS中位数尚未达到(p<0.0001)。排除仅接受姑息治疗患者后结果仍一致。疾病进展后治疗显著影响生存:接受积极治疗者OS中位数7.3个月,未接受后续治疗者为0.7个月(p<0.0001)。双特异性抗体疗效最佳(HR=0.44,p=0.02),6个月和12个月OS率分别为90%和55%。研究结果确认PC-PI的预后价值,支持其用于CAR-T 失败后LBCL患者风险适应性管理。
Most patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) progressing after CAR-T therapy experience poor survival and lack standardized treatment strategies. Prognostic tools are needed to guide decision-making at relapse. The Post-CAR Prognostic Index (PC-PI), recently proposed by Iacoboni et al. , combines five routine clinical variables to stratify outcomes after CAR-T failure: ECOG (> 0), hemoglobin (< 10 g/dL), LDH ( 2xULN), number of extranodal sites (> 1) and time from CAR-T to progression (< 4 months).
We evaluated the PC-PI in a retrospective multicenter study including 125 LBCL patients relapsing or refractory after axicabtagene-ciloleucel or tisagenlecleucel, treated between 2019 and 2023 across 16 Italian centers belonging to the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi network. Median overall survival (OS) was 4. 9 months, with 6- and 12-month OS rates of 44. 9% and 28. 5%, respectively. The PC-PI discriminated prognosis effectively: high-risk patients had a median OS of 1.
8 months, intermediate-high 2. 2, intermediate-low 8. 7, while in the low-risk group median OS was not reached (p<0. 0001). Results remained consistent after excluding patients receiving only palliative care. Post-progression therapy markedly influenced survival: patients receiving active treatment achieved a median OS of 7. 3 months versus 0. 7 without further therapy (p<0. 0001). Bispecific antibodies conferred the best outcomes (HR 0. 44, p=0. 02), with 6- and 12-month OS rates of 90% and 55%.
Our findings confirm the prognostic value of the PC-PI and support its use in clinical practice as a tool for risk-adapted management of LBCL after CAR-T failure.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。