研究概要
Tisa-cel 和 cilta-cel 分别在 LBCL 和 MM 患者中显示出更有利的 ICANS 安全性特征,而 brexu-cel 在 MCL 患者中显示出更高的 ICANS 发生率。需要进一步的比较研究来校正治疗相关的混杂因素。
研究思路结论见上方概要
背景
嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法是一种过继性免疫疗法,已扩大了多种血液系统恶性肿瘤的治疗选择。然而,CAR-T 疗法与一系列副作用相关,包括免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS),其发生率和严重程度不一。
目的
评估CAR-T 治疗在不同血液疾病中ICANS的发生率和特征,重点关注产品特异性差异。
方法
我们检索了PubMed、Embase和Cochrane Library,截止日期为2024年2月16日。通过随机效应模型估计了ICANS(总体、较严重和较轻)的合并发生率及95%置信区间(CIs)。针对每种淋巴瘤类型——大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)、多发性骨髓瘤(MM)和套细胞淋巴瘤(MCL)——分别进行了meta分析。
结果
在回顾的259篇文章中,对30项研究进行了meta分析。在LBCL患者中,tisagenlecleucel的ICANS发生率(16.5 %,95 % CI:12.9-20.9;n = 1108例患者)似乎低于axicabtagene ciloleucel(45.6 %,95 % CI:39.6-51.7;n = 1579)。在MM患者中,ciltacabtagene autoleucel的发生率(10.4 %,95 % CI:5.2-19.9;n = 348)似乎低于idecabtagene vicleucel(18.3 %;95 % CI:15.4-21.5;n = 631)。对于MCL患者(n = 198),brexucabtagene autoleucel显示ICANS的总体发生率高(61.2 %;95 % CI:54.2-67.8),其中较严重事件(32.9 %;95 % CI:26.7 %-39.7 %)略高于较轻事件(28.6 %;95 % CI:22.7 %-35.3 %)。
展开英文摘要原文
BACKGROUND
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, a form of adoptive immunotherapy, has expanded treatment options for various hematologic malignancies. However, CAR T therapy is associated with a range of side effects, including immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), with variable incidence and severity.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the incidence and characteristics of ICANS following CAR T therapy in different hematological diseases, with a focus on product-specific variations.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library through 2/16/2024. Pooled incidence and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for ICANS (overall, more severe, and less severe) were estimated via a random-effects model. Separate meta-analyses were conducted for each lymphoma type - large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), multiple myeloma (MM), and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).
RESULTS
Of 259 articles reviewed, 30 studies were meta-analyzed. Among LBCL patients, the incidence of ICANS appeared lower with tisagenlecleucel (16.5 %, 95 % CI: 12.9-20.9; n = 1108 patients) than with axicabtagene ciloleucel (45.6 %, 95 % CI: 39.6-51.7; n = 1579). In MM patients, the incidence appeared lower with ciltacabtagene autoleucel (10.4 %, 95 % CI: 5.2-19.9; n = 348) than with idecabtagene vicleucel (18.3 %; 95 % CI: 15.4-21.5; n = 631). For MCL patients (n = 198), brexucabtagene autoleucel showed a high overall incidence of ICANS (61.2 %; 95 % CI: 54.2-67.8), with more severe events (32.9 %; 95 % CI: 26.7 %-39.7 %) slightly exceeding less severe ones (28.6 %; 95 % CI: 22.7 %-35.3 %).
CONCLUSION
Tisa-cel and cilta-cel showed a more favorable ICANS safety profile in LBCL and MM patients, respectively, while brexu-cel showed a higher ICANS incidence in MCL patients. Further comparative studies are needed to adjust for treatment-related confounders.
论文信息
- 作者
- Thirugnanam A、Donthineni K、Mammi M、Hundel J、Munteh D、D'Amore F、Bunevicius A、Mekary RA
- 第一作者单位
- Department of Pharmaceutical Business and Administrative Sciences, School of Pharmacy, MCPHS, Boston, MA 02115, USA.United States
- 通讯作者单位
- Department of Pharmaceutical Business and Administrative Sciences, School of Pharmacy, MCPHS, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center at Harvard, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115. Electronic address: rania.mekary@mcphs.edu.United States
- 文献类型
- 荟萃分析 · 综述
- 期刊
- Critical reviews in oncology/hematology2026 Feb