← 返回前沿论文

多组学分析揭示基于详细吸烟史的免疫治疗±化疗在晚期非小细胞肺癌中的差异性获益

英文原题:Multi-omics analysis reveals differential benefits of immunotherapy±chemotherapy based on detailed smoking history in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

PubMed 2025/12/21(内容时间) J Immunother Cancer Q1 · IF 11.7(JCR 2025)

研究概要

详细的吸烟史通过肿瘤微环境和全身血浆蛋白谱的机制性改变,为优化晚期NSCLC的IO选择提供了关键见解。

研究思路结论见上方概要

尽管免疫治疗和化疗已经改变了非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的治疗格局,但关于详细吸烟史如何影响不断演变的治疗选择以及驱动这些效应的潜在分子机制,仍存在关键问题。

我们分析了4157例在Dana-Farber癌症研究所和Memorial Sloan Kettering癌症中心(2010-2023年)接受免疫单药治疗(IO alone)(n=2768)或化疗免疫治疗(chemo-IO)(n=1389)的晚期NSCLC患者。采用多变量分析评估详细吸烟史(状态和累积包年)与临床结局之间的关联。在PD-L1 TPS为50%的EGFR/ALK野生型患者中,比较了一线chemo-IO与IO alone。从靶向NGS panel中推断烟草吸烟相关突变特征(TSMS)。我们研究了详细吸烟史与肿瘤基因组学/转录组学、PD-L1表达、TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)和循环血浆蛋白质组学之间的关系。

在仅接受IO治疗的患者中,吸烟状态和吸烟强度均与改善的缓解和生存结局呈剂量依赖性关联。相比之下,在接受化疗-IO治疗的患者中,吸烟史不影响初始缓解,但活跃吸烟(HR=0.73,95% CI 0.57至0.94,p=0.01)和重度烟草使用(HR=0.76,95% CI 0.62至0.93,p=0.001)的患者显示出改善的无进展生存期(PFS),以及总生存期(OS)改善的趋势。重要的是,这些关联独立于STK11、KEAP1和KRAS共突变状态。在PD-L1 TPS为50%且无EGFR/ALK改变的患者中,不吸烟的患者从一线化疗-IO相比仅IO治疗中获得显著获益,表现为更高的缓解率(70.0% vs 23.9%,p=0.001)、延长的PFS(中位PFS 9.5 vs 3.7个月,HR=0.51,95% CI 0.27至0.95,p=0.04),以及OS延长的趋势,而吸烟的患者在两种策略下显示出可比的结果。TSMS独立预测仅IO治疗的改善结局,即使在肿瘤突变负荷(TMB)调整后也是如此。分子分析揭示了烟草使用与更高的TMB、增加的TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)(CD8 +、PD-1 +、CD8 + PD-1 +、FOXP3 +)以及参与免疫信号通路的独特血浆蛋白谱(CCL7、CXCL17、CDCP1、TNFRSF6B)之间的关联。

展开英文摘要原文

BACKGROUND: Despite immunotherapy chemotherapy has transformed the therapeutic landscape for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), critical questions remain regarding how detailed smoking history affects the evolving treatment options and the underlying molecular mechanisms driving these effects. METHODS: We analyzed 4157 patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated with immunotherapy monotherapy (IO alone) (n=2768) or chemoimmunotherapy (chemo-IO) (n=1389) at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (2010-2023). Associations between detailed smoking history (status and cumulative pack-years) and clinical outcomes were assessed using multivariable analyses. First-line chemo-IO versus IO alone was compared in programmed death receptor ligand 1 (PD-L1) Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of 50% EGFR/ALK wild-type patients. Tobacco smoking-related mutational signature (TSMS) was inferred from the targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) panel. We investigated relationships between detailed smoking history and tumor genomics/transcriptomics, PD-L1 expression, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and circulating plasma proteomics. RESULTS: In patients receiving IO alone, both smoking status and intensity showed dose-dependent associations with improved response and survival outcomes. In contrast, among patients receiving chemo-IO, smoking history did not affect initial response but patients with active (HR=0.73, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.94, p=0.01) and heavy tobacco use (HR=0.76, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.93, p=0.001) showed improved progression-free survival (PFS), and a trend toward improved overall survival (OS). Importantly, these associations remained independent of STK11 , KEAP1 , and KRAS co-mutation status. In patients with PD-L1 TPS of 50% lacking EGFR/ALK alterations, patients who do not smoke derived significant benefit from first-line chemo-IO versus IO alone with higher response rates (70.0% vs 23.9%, p=0.001), prolonged PFS (median PFS 9.5 vs 3.7 months, HR=0.51, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.95, p=0.04), and a trend toward prolonged OS, while patients who smoke showed comparable outcomes with either strategy. TSMS independently predicted improved outcomes of IO alone, even after tumor mutational burden (TMB) adjustment. Molecular analyses revealed associations between tobacco use and higher TMB, increased tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (CD8 + , PD-1 + , CD8 + PD-1 + , FOXP3 + ) and distinct plasma protein profiles involved in immune signaling pathways (CCL7, CXCL17, CDCP1, TNFRSF6B). CONCLUSIONS: Detailed smoking history provides crucial insights for optimizing IO selection in advanced NSCLC through mechanistic alterations in both the tumor microenvironment and systemic plasma protein profiles.

论文信息

作者
Wang X、Ricciuti B、Elkrief A、Alessi JV、Di Federico A、Pecci F、Nishino M、Gulhan D
第一作者单位
Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.United States
通讯作者单位
Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA dchris@hsph.harvard.edu.United States
期刊
Journal for immunotherapy of cancer2025 Dec 21
原文标识
PubMed 41423267 · DOI 10.1136/jitc-2025-012205