← 返回

CAR-T 细胞治疗血液系统恶性肿瘤的疗效与安全性:系统综述与荟萃分析的伞状综述

英文原题:Efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell in the treatment of hematologic malignancy: an umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analysis.

查看英文原题

Efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell in the treatment of hematologic malignancy: an umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analysis.

PubMed 2025/11/19(内容时间) Front Immunol Q1 · IF 7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

CAR-T 疗法在 ALL 和 DLBCL 中显示出有前景的临床结局,但显著的安全性担忧仍然存在。将 CAR-T 与 HSCT 等疗法联合可提高疗效,但也会增加严重毒性的风险。未来研究应聚焦于优化 CAR-T 构建体、改进预处理方案,以及识别预测性生物标志物,以个体化治疗并降低脆弱人群中的风险。

研究思路结论见上方概要

本伞状综述整合了关于CAR-T 细胞疗法在血液系统恶性肿瘤中疗效与安全性的系统综述和meta分析数据。目的是评估CAR-T 在不同恶性肿瘤中的疗效,识别关键安全性问题,并提供临床建议。

我们对PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews进行了全面检索,截止至2024年5月。纳入评估CAR-T 在血液系统恶性肿瘤中疗效的系统评价和meta分析。采用AMSTAR工具评估方法学质量,并运用GRADE系统评价每个结局的证据质量。

共纳入105项meta分析。CD19靶向CAR-T 疗法在急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)和弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)中显示出更优疗效,尤其是在复发/难治性病例中(高质量)。然而,CAR-T 单药治疗在中枢神经系统淋巴瘤(CNSL)中疗效降低(中等质量)。联合治疗,尤其是CAR-T 联合HSCT,提高了完全缓解率,但与严重不良事件增加相关,如CRS和神经毒性(高质量)。与Tisa-ce相比,Axi-cel具有更高的ICANS和中性粒细胞减少风险(高质量),可能与其CD28共刺激结构域增强T细胞活化有关。

展开英文摘要原文

This umbrella review consolidates data from systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the efficacy and safety of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy in hematologic malignancies. The aim is to assess CAR-T efficacy across different malignancies, identify key safety concerns, and provide clinical recommendations.

We conducted a thorough search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews up to May 2024. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluating CAR-T efficacy in hematologic malignancies were included. The AMSTAR tool was used to assess methodological quality, and the GRADE system was employed to evaluate the quality of evidence for each outcome.

A total of 105 meta-analyses met the inclusion criteria. CD19-targeted CAR-T therapies demonstrated superior efficacy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), particularly in relapsed or refractory cases (high-quality). However, CAR-T monotherapy showed reduced efficacy in central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) (middle-quality). Combination therapies, particularly CAR-T with HSCT, improved complete response rates but were associated with increased severe adverse events, such as CRS and neurotoxicity (high-quality). Axi-cel was found to carry a higher risk of ICANS and neutropenia compared to Tisa-ce (high-quality), likely due to its CD28 costimulatory domains, which enhance T-cell activation.

CAR-T therapy demonstrates promising clinical outcomes in ALL and DLBCL, but significant safety concerns remain. Combining CAR-T with therapies such as HSCT improves efficacy but also heightens the risk of severe toxicities. Future research should focus on optimizing CAR-T constructs, refining preconditioning regimens, and identifying predictive biomarkers to personalize treatment and mitigate risks in vulnerable populations. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024581782.

论文信息

作者
Yu Z、Jing C、Xie L、Min L、Li L、Wang Z、Niu T
单位
Department of Hematology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.China
文献类型
系统综述 · 荟萃分析
期刊
Frontiers in immunology2025
原文标识
PubMed 41346592 · DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1608768