← 返回

I 期自然杀伤/T 细胞淋巴瘤单纯放疗与综合治疗的比较:局部侵犯对治疗结局的影响

英文原题:Radiotherapy alone versus combined therapy in stage I natural killer/T-cell lymphoma: impact of local invasion on treatment outcomes.

查看英文原题

Radiotherapy alone versus combined therapy in stage I natural killer/T-cell lymphoma: impact of local invasion on treatment outcomes.

PubMed 2025/11/18(内容时间) Clin Exp Med Q2 · IF 4.5(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

尽管早期自然杀伤/T细胞淋巴瘤(NKTCL)常推荐采用综合治疗,但化疗相较单纯放疗(RT)在I期疾病中的额外获益仍不明确。

我们回顾性分析了中国三个中心接受RT联合或不联合以培门冬酶为基础化疗的294例I期NKTCL患者,并在SEER数据库的242例患者中验证了这些发现。在中国队列中,局部侵犯(定义为骨受累、皮肤浸润、穿孔或延伸至鼻旁窦)和治疗方式是无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的独立预后因素(均P < 0.05)。与单纯RT相比,化疗联合RT显著改善了5年PFS(85.3% vs. 65.2%,P = 0.007)和OS(91.4% vs. 82.0%,P = 0.027)。在亚组分析中,无局部侵犯的患者未从化疗中获益(5年PFS:91.9% vs. 87.6%,P = 0.19;5年OS:96.4% vs. 96.3%,P = 0.55),而有局部侵犯的患者则获得了显著改善(5年PFS:78.4% vs. 45.4%,P = 0.008;5年OS:86.3% vs. 65.4%,P = 0.018)。这些发现在倾向性评分匹配后仍保持一致。在SEER队列的探索性分析中,化疗改善了原发累及非鼻/鼻咽部位患者的OS(P = 0.044),但在鼻/鼻咽疾病患者中未改善(P = 0.23)。对于无局部侵犯的I期NKTCL,单纯RT似乎可提供极佳结局,而对于有局部侵犯的患者,化疗仍是必要的。

展开英文摘要原文

Although combined modality therapy is frequently recommended for early-stage natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (NKTCL), the additional benefit of chemotherapy over radiation therapy (RT) alone in stage I disease remains unclear.

We retrospectively analyzed 294 stage I NKTCL patients treated with RT with or without asparaginase-based chemotherapy across three centers in China and validated the findings in 242 patients from the SEER database. In the Chinese cohort, local invasion (defined as bone involvement, skin infiltration, perforation, or extension into the paranasal sinuses) and treatment modality were independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (all P < 0.

05). Chemotherapy plus RT significantly improved 5-year PFS (85. 3% vs. 65. 2%, P = 0. 007) and OS (91. 4% vs. 82. 0%, P = 0. 027) compared to RT alone. In subgroup analyses, patients without local invasion did not benefit from chemotherapy (5-year PFS: 91. 9% vs. 87. 6%, P = 0. 19; 5-year OS: 96. 4% vs. 96. 3%, P = 0. 55), whereas those with local invasion experienced substantial improvements (5-year PFS: 78. 4% vs. 45. 4%, P = 0. 008; 5-year OS: 86. 3% vs. 65. 4%, P = 0. 018).

These findings were consistent after propensity score matching. In an exploratory analysis of the SEER cohort, chemotherapy improved OS among patients with primary involvement of non-nasal/nasopharyngeal sites (P = 0. 044), but not in those with nasal/nasopharyngeal disease (P = 0. 23). RT alone appears to provide excellent outcomes for stage I NKTCL without local invasion, while chemotherapy remains necessary for those with local invasion.

论文信息

作者
He S、Song H、Zuo W、Liu S、Huang Z、Liu Y、Wang Z、Li X
第一作者单位
Department of Oncology, Guangyuan Central Hospital, No. 16 Jingxiangzi, Guangyuan, 628000, Sichuan, China.China
通讯作者单位
Department of Oncology, Guangyuan Central Hospital, No. 16 Jingxiangzi, Guangyuan, 628000, Sichuan, China. 495820417@qq.com.China
文献类型
对照研究
期刊
Clinical and experimental medicine2025 Nov 18
原文标识
PubMed 41249517 · DOI 10.1007/s10238-025-01930-6