← 返回

美国初治与复发/难治性弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者的真实世界治疗模式与临床结局

英文原题:Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of patients with treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the United States.

查看英文原题

Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of patients with treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the United States.

PubMed 2025/10/14(内容时间) Leuk Res Q2 · IF 2.4(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

本研究强调需要改进治疗方案并增加新疗法的可及性,同时指出社区肿瘤学环境中的不足。

研究思路结论见上方概要

随着治疗格局的不断演变和治疗选择的日益增多,了解目前真实世界临床实践中使用的治疗方法以及DLBCL患者的相关结局,对于识别潜在的未满足治疗需求至关重要。

这项回顾性纵向队列研究利用COTA电子健康记录数据库,考察了2016年至2023年间弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者的治疗模式和结局。研究人群包括3569名在社区肿瘤治疗机构接受一线(1L)治疗的患者。

19%的患者在1L化疗免疫治疗后复发(主要为R-CHOP)。最常见的二线治疗包括以利妥昔单抗为基础的方案和自体干细胞移植(ASCT)。抗体药物偶联物(ADCs)和CAR-T 细胞治疗在三线或更晚线使用。中位无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)随每一线治疗递减。真实世界中复发/难治性DLBCL患者预后较差(24个月OS为41.7%)。接受ASCT或CAR-T 细胞治疗的患者OS优于未接受细胞治疗的患者,24个月OS分别为78%、54%和31%。

展开英文摘要原文

With the evolving treatment landscape and growing therapeutic options, it is essential to understand the treatments currently used in real-world clinical practice and the associated outcomes among patients with DLBCL to identify potential unmet treatment needs.

This retrospective longitudinal cohort study examined treatment patterns and outcomes for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients using the COTA electronic health records database from 2016 to 2023. The study population included 3569 patients, treated in community oncology settings, who received first-line (1L) therapy.

Nineteen percent of patients relapsed after 1L chemoimmunotherapy (primarily R-CHOP). The most common second-line treatments included rituximab-based regimens and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and CAR T-cell therapy were administered in third-line or later. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) decreased with each line. Relapsed/refractory real-world DLBCL patients experienced poor outcomes (24-month OS of 41.7 %). Patients receiving ASCT or CAR T-cell therapy had better OS than those who did not receive cellular therapies, with 24-month OS of 78 %, 54 %, and 31 %, respectively.

This study highlights the need for improved treatment options and increased access to novel therapies, emphasizing gaps in community oncology settings.

论文信息

作者
Lue JK、Bobbili PJ、Garg M、Yee CW、Ryland KE、Gupta S、Liu D、Raut M
第一作者单位
Lymphoma Service, Division of Hematological Malignancies, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, David H. Koch Center, 530 East 74th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA.United States
通讯作者单位
Analysis Group, Inc., 111 Huntington Ave, 14th floor, Boston, MA 02199, USA. Electronic address: christopher.yee@analysisgroup.com.United States
期刊
Leukemia research2025 Dec
原文标识
PubMed 41240569 · DOI 10.1016/j.leukres.2025.108117