← 返回

NK 细胞大颗粒淋巴细胞白血病的诊断标准:通过多中心国际研究的验证

英文原题:Diagnostic criteria for NK cell large granular lymphocyte leukemia: validation through a multicentric international study.

查看英文原题

Diagnostic criteria for NK cell large granular lymphocyte leukemia: validation through a multicentric international study.

PubMed 2026/02/10(内容时间) Blood Adv Q1 · IF 7.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

自然杀伤(NK)大颗粒淋巴细胞白血病(LGLL)是一种罕见的淋巴增殖性疾病,缺乏明确的克隆性标志物,使诊断及与反应性NK细胞增多症的鉴别变得复杂。

我们此前提出了一种具有高诊断准确性的NK克隆性评分,但一部分患者仍无法分类。在这项多中心国际研究中,我们利用来自3个国家登记处(美国、意大利和法国)的独立训练队列(n = 78)和验证队列(n = 57),对更新的诊断标准进行了细化和验证。修订后的框架将NK评分参数与CC基序趋化因子配体22(CCL22)突变及骨髓活检(BMB)结果相整合。定义了四项主要标准:NK细胞计数1.0 109/L、杀伤细胞免疫球蛋白样受体限制性、CD94/NKG2A过表达,以及STAT3、TET2或CCL22的体细胞突变,后者为新引入。在训练队列中,50例患者通过NK评分>4被分类为NK-LGLL,18例为中间评分(2-3),10例被诊断为反应性增殖。在16例患者(20%)中发现了CCL22突变,其中包括5例中间评分者被重新分类为NK-LGLL;BMB在另外2例中支持诊断,最终共有57例NK-LGLL。与替代诊断的患者相比,这些患者表现出更多的血细胞减少、更高的治疗需求和更大的输血需求。在验证队列中(25例NK-LGLL和32例反应性病例),在5例NK-LGLL(20%)中检测到CCL22突变。

总之,纳入CCL22突变减少了未分类患者的比例,在不影响特异性的情况下提高了诊断敏感性,并可能减少对侵入性操作的依赖。这些修订后的国际标准朝着标准化、分子指导的NK-LGLL诊断迈出了一步。

展开英文摘要原文

Natural killer (NK) large granular lymphocytic leukemia (LGLL) is a rare lymphoproliferative disorder lacking definitive clonality markers, complicating diagnosis and distinction from reactive NK cell expansions.

We previously proposed an NK clonality score with high diagnostic accuracy, but a subset of patients remained unclassified. In this multicenter international study, we refined and validated updated diagnostic criteria using independent training (n = 78) and validation (n = 57) cohorts from 3 national registries (United States, Italy, and France). The revised framework integrates NK score parameters with CC motif chemokine ligand 22 (CCL22) mutations and bone marrow biopsy (BMB) findings. Four major criteria were defined: NK cell count of 1. 0 109/L, killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptor restriction, CD94/NKG2A overexpression, and somatic mutations in STAT3, TET2, or CCL22, the latter newly introduced. In the training cohort, 50 patients were classified as having NK-LGLL by an NK score of >4, 18 had intermediate scores (2-3), and 10 were diagnosed as reactive proliferations.

CCL22 mutations were identified in 16 patients (20%), including 5 with intermediate scores who were reclassified as NK-LGLL; BMB supported the diagnosis in 2 additional cases, resulting in 57 NK-LGLL overall. These patients exhibited more cytopenias, higher treatment needs, and greater transfusion requirements than patients with alternative diagnoses.

In the validation cohort (25 NK-LGLL and 32 reactive cases), CCL22 mutations were detected in 5 NK-LGLL (20%). Altogether, incorporation of CCL22 mutations reduced the fraction of unclassified patients, improved diagnostic sensitivity without compromising specificity, and may decrease reliance on invasive procedures. These revised international criteria represent a step toward standardized, molecularly guided NK-LGLL diagnosis.

论文信息

作者
Pastoret C、Yang J、Feith DJ、Roussel M、Moignet A、Dighe S、Solga MD、Marchand T
第一作者单位
Laboratoire d'Hématologie, Pôle Biologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Rennes, France.France
通讯作者单位
Unité Mixte de Recherche UMR1236, INSERM, Université Rennes, Etablissement Français du sang Bretagne, Equipe labellisée Ligue, LabEx IGO, Rennes, France.France
文献类型
多中心研究 · 验证性研究
期刊
Blood advances2026 Feb 10
原文标识
PubMed 41191533 · DOI 10.1182/bloodadvances.2025016509