← 返回

不同诊疗场景下接受 CAR-T 细胞治疗的弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者的医疗资源利用与成本:一项真实世界数据分析

英文原题:Health care resource utilization and costs of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies across different settings of care: A real-world data analysis.

查看英文原题

Health care resource utilization and costs of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies across different settings of care: A real-world data analysis.

PubMed 2025/11/01(内容时间) J Manag Care Spec Pharm Q2 · IF 3.3(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

DLBCL CAR-T 产品主要在住院环境中给药。

中文摘要

CAR-T 细胞疗法改变了复发/难治性弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的治疗。医院接诊能力有限,可能限制患者住院接受CAR-T 输注。新兴数据已显示门诊CAR-T 给药的安全性和可行性,但DLBCL患者门诊与住院CAR-T 给药的真实世界经济结局数据有限。

描述美国商业保险人群中,门诊接受CAR-T 输注的DLBCL患者相较住院接受输注患者的全因医疗资源利用(HRU)和成本。

研究者利用IQVIA PharMetrics Plus健康计划索赔数据库开展回顾性队列研究,时间范围为2017年1月至2024年3月。识别接受CAR-T 输注的DLBCL患者,并以数据库中最早的CAR-T 输注日期作为索引日。排除参与临床试验或CAR-T 费用数据无效(索引后30天全因或CAR-T 相关费用低于250,000美元)的患者。描述索引CAR-T 输注后30天内的全因HRU和成本(包括CAR-T 产品成本),并按索引输注地点分层;对接受axicabtagene ciloleucel(axi-cel)的患者开展亚组分析。

508例患者符合全部筛选标准,其中442例住院接受CAR-T,66例门诊接受。Axi-cel是观察到最多的DLBCL专用CAR-T 产品(223例),其中10.3%(23例)在门诊接受。CAR-T 输注后30天内,门诊队列有48.5%住院;门诊接受axi-cel的患者有60.9%住院。与住院队列相比,门诊组重症监护病房入住率较低(总体18.2%比43.9%;axi-cel亚组39.1%比43.5%),住院时间中位数较短(总体9.0比15.0天;axi-cel亚组11.0比15.0天)。门诊队列30天总费用均值似乎更低,总体为643,902美元比691,771美元,axi-cel亚组为695,904美元比741,449美元。

DLBCL患者接受CAR-T 产品治疗主要仍在住院环境进行。对于DLBCL的总体CAR-T 产品及axi-cel,门诊给药患者住院服务利用率和费用往往低于住院给药者,提示门诊CAR-T 可能有助于缓解治疗容量限制和经济负担。

展开英文摘要原文

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapies have transformed the management of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Receiving CAR T infusion in the hospital may be limited by constrained capacity of hospitals. Emerging data have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of outpatient CAR T administration. There are limited real-world data on economic outcomes for inpatient and outpatient CAR T administration among patients with DLBCL.

To describe all-cause health care resource utilization (HRU) and costs of patients with DLBCL receiving CAR T infusion in the outpatient setting relative to those infused in the inpatient setting within a commercially insured population within the United States.

A retrospective cohort study was conducted leveraging IQVIA PharMetrics Plus Health Plans Claims database between January 2017 and March 2024. Patients with DLBCL who received a CAR T infusion were identified and indexed on the date of the earliest CAR T infusion observed. Patients with clinical trial participation or invalid CAR T cost data (30-day post-index all-cause or CAR T-related costs of <$250,000) were excluded. All-cause HRU and costs (including CAR T product costs) within 30 days following the index CAR T infusion were described, stratified by the index infusion setting of care. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients receiving axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel).

There were 508 patients receiving CAR T infusion and meeting all selection criteria. 442 patients had CAR T administered in the inpatient setting, and 66 had it in the outpatient setting. Axi-cel was the most observed DLBCL-specific CAR T product (n = 223), and 10.3% received it in the outpatient setting (n = 23). Within 30 days following CAR T infusion, 48.5% of the outpatient cohort and 60.9% of patients receiving axi-cel in the outpatient setting had an inpatient stay, with lower rates of intensive care unit admissions (overall: 18.2% vs 43.9%; axi-cel: 39.1% vs 43.5%) and shorter median inpatient stays (overall: 9.0 vs 15.0 days; axi-cel: 11.0 vs 15.0 days) than the inpatient cohort. The mean total 30-day costs appeared lower in the outpatient cohort, overall ($643,902 vs $691,771) and for axi-cel ($695,904 vs $741,449).

DLBCL CAR T products were administered predominantly in the inpatient setting. For overall CAR T products for DLBCL and axi-cel, patients receiving CAR T administration in the outpatient setting tended to have lower inpatient service utilizations and lower costs relative to those receiving it in the inpatient setting, suggesting that outpatient CAR T administration may help address capacity constraint and economic burden of CAR T delivery.

论文信息

作者
Patel AR、Hasegawa K、Pandya S、Shi L、Lau C、Zhao X、Near AM、Locke FL
第一作者单位
Kite, a Gilead company, Santa Monica, CA.
通讯作者单位
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL.United States
期刊
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2025 Nov
原文标识
PubMed 41171063 · DOI 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.11.1110