CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Inferior survival in double refractory large B-cell lymphoma eligible for third-line CD19 CAR T-cell therapy.
Inferior survival in double refractory large B-cell lymphoma eligible for third-line CD19 CAR T-cell therapy.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
对于初始治疗中对蒽环类药物耐药、且对铂类挽救治疗也耐药(即双重耐药,DR)的大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)患者,接受三线及后续CD19嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞治疗的结局尚未充分描述;这些患者是否较难最终接受CAR-T 输注也不明确。
本研究旨在评估DR与非双重耐药(NDR)LBCL队列接受三线CAR-T 后的生存结局,包括未能进行细胞输注的比例。对本中心转诊接受CAR-T 治疗的199例LBCL患者进行回顾性分析后发现,DR-LBCL患者(68例)12个月总生存率低于NDR-LBCL患者(131例)(47.1%比66.7%)。总生存期差异主要由未能接受CAR-T 输注的比例较高所致(32%比18%)。未能接受CAR-T 输注的患者总生存期中位数为2.56个月;DR-LBCL为1.94个月,NDR-LBCL为3.42个月。最终接受CAR-T 输注的DR和NDR患者,其12个月总生存率(65%比72.3%)及6个月无进展生存率(46.5%比57.2%)似乎相近。
本研究揭示了一个高危亚组:其总生存期较差,且难以顺利接受CAR-T 输注,可能需要采用不同管理策略,例如新型桥接治疗或现货型疗法。
Outcomes following CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in third-line treatment and beyond for patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) refractory to both an anthracycline during initial and platinum-based salvage therapy, referred to as double refractory (DR), are not well-described. It is also unclear if these patients may be less likely to proceed to CAR T-cell infusion.
Our objectives were to assess third-line CAR T-cell survival outcomes in DR- and non-DR (NDR)-LBCL cohorts including the failure rates to proceed to cell infusion. Review of 199 patients with LBCL referred for CAR T-cell treatment at our center, demonstrates that the DR-LBCL patients (n = 68) have an inferior 12-month (overall survival [OS], 47. 1% vs 66. 7%, respectively;) when compared to the patients with NDR-LBCL (n = 131).
This OS difference is driven by a higher failure rate to proceed to CAR T-cell infusion (32% vs 18%). For patients unable to proceed to CAR T-cell infusion median OS was 2. 56 months; DR-LBCL 1. 94 months vs NDR-LBCL 3. 42 months. The 12-month OS (65% vs 72. 3%) and 6-month progression-free survival (46. 5% vs 57. 2%) of patients with DR- and NDR-LBCL proceeding to CAR T-cell infusion, appears similar.
Our study highlights a high-risk subgroup characterized by inferior OS with challenges in getting to CAR T-cell infusion and could benefit from different management approaches such as novel bridging or "off-the-shelf" strategies.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。