CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Digital Immunophenotyping of Lung Atypical Carcinoids and Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinomas Identifies Three Subtypes With Specific Tumor-Immune Microenvironment Features.
Digital Immunophenotyping of Lung Atypical Carcinoids and Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinomas Identifies Three Subtypes With Specific Tumor-Immune Microenvironment Features.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
世界卫生组织依据形态学标准,将非典型类癌(AC)和大细胞神经内分泌癌(LCNEC)分别定义为中级别和高级别肺神经内分泌肿瘤,但其治疗策略仍存在争议。鉴于肿瘤微环境(TME)和TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)在癌症预后和治疗应答中的作用日益受到重视,本研究旨在全面表征AC和LCNEC的免疫景观。研究者对重新评估的56例AC和104例LCNEC队列进行免疫组化检测,包括T细胞标志物(CD3、CD8)、免疫检查点(PD-1、PD-L1)、HLA分子(HLA-DR、HLA-I)及成纤维细胞标志物α-SMA。数字图像分析定量全切片及特定肿瘤区域(浸润边缘和肿瘤中心)内的肿瘤内CD3、CD8 TIL(iTIL)和基质TIL(sTIL)。
与AC相比,LCNEC的基质T细胞浸润、免疫检查点表达及HLA表达显著更高(p<0.001),而α-SMA在AC中更突出。未见AC肿瘤细胞表达PD-L1。数字定量证实LCNEC在所有区域的iTIL和sTIL均较多,且与人工计数具有中度一致性。有趣的是,浸润边缘的TIL指标高于肿瘤中心(p<0.001)。研究者利用Boruta特征筛选算法、主成分分析和层次聚类,识别出3个患者亚群:亚群1以AC为主、TIL低且预后良好;亚群2组织学混合、TIL中等且预后中等;亚群3以LCNEC为主、TIL高但预后较差,各亚群具有不同的TME标志物特征。肿瘤细胞PD-L1表达与亚群3密切相关。这些发现提示AC和LCNEC可分为3种不同免疫亚群,凸显其肿瘤微环境异质性,并为进一步转化研究提供依据。
Atypical carcinoids (ACs) and large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNECs) are defined by the WHO as intermediate- and high-grade lung neuroendocrine neoplasms, respectively, based on morphological criteria; however, treatment strategies remain debated. Given the emerging role of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in cancer prognosis and therapy response, this study aimed to characterize the immune landscape of ACs and LCNECs comprehensively. Immunohistochemistry for T-cell markers (CD3, CD8), immune checkpoints (PD-1, PD-L1), HLA molecules (HLA-DR, HLA-I), and fibroblasts ( -SMA) was performed on a re-evaluated cohort of 56 ACs and 104 LCNECs. Digital image analysis quantified intra-tumor (iTILs) and stromal (sTILs) CD3 and CD8 TILs in the whole slide and in specific tumor regions (invasive margin [IM] and central tumor [CT]).
LCNECs exhibited significantly higher stromal T-cell infiltration, immune checkpoint expression, and HLA compared to ACs (p < 0. 001), while -SMA was more prominent in ACs. No ACs showed PD-L1 tumor expression. Digital quantification confirmed greater iTILs and sTILs in LCNECs across all regions, with moderate concordance to manual counts. Interestingly, TIL parameters were higher at the IM than in the CT (p < 0.
001). Using Boruta feature selection algorithm, Principal Component Analysis and Hierarchical Clustering, three patient clusters were identified: Cluster 1 (mainly ACs, low TILs, favorable prognosis), Cluster 2 (mixed histology, intermediate TILs, moderate prognosis), and Cluster 3 (mostly LCNECs, high TILs, poor prognosis), with distinct TME marker profiles. PD-L1 tumor expression was strongly linked to Cluster 3.
These findings suggest that ACs and LCNECs may be stratified into three distinct immune clusters, highlighting the heterogeneity of their tumor microenvironment and providing a rationale for further translational studies.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。