← 返回

基于炎症的评分在接受 CD3×CD20 双特异性 T 细胞衔接器治疗的复发/难治性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者中的预后价值

英文原题:Prognostic value of inflammation-based scores in patients with R/R LBCL treated with CD3×CD20 bispecific T-cell engagers.

查看英文原题

Prognostic value of inflammation-based scores in patients with R/R LBCL treated with CD3×CD20 bispecific T-cell engagers.

PubMed 2026/03/10(内容时间) Blood Adv Q1 · IF 7.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

T细胞重定向双特异性抗体(bsAb)为复发/难治性大B细胞淋巴瘤(R/R LBCL)提供了一种新型治疗方法,但仍需预测性生物标志物以识别最可能应答的患者。由于bsAb和嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞均属于T细胞疗法,我们假设反映全身炎症程度的CAR-HEMATOTOX(HT)和InflaMix模型也可能对bsAb治疗具有预后价值。

我们将两种评分应用于一项国际多中心队列,该队列纳入15个中心接受bsAb治疗的174例R/R LBCL患者。HT评分较高的患者(≥3分,占35%)无进展生存期(PFS;1.4比7.4个月;P<0.0001)和总生存期(OS;2.0比21.7个月;P<0.0001)中位数均较短。采用InflaMix评分时,49%的患者被划分至炎症簇,其PFS(1.9比17.8个月;P<0.0001)和OS(4.1比21.7个月;P<0.0001)中位数也显著缩短。多变量Cox回归校正多种预后因素后,HT和InflaMix仍是PFS和OS的独立不良危险因素。HT评分升高且具有炎症特征的患者,OS和PFS显著短于任一评分判定为低风险的患者。在既往接受CAR治疗的亚组中,CAR-T 治疗后早期复发(<3个月)并伴炎症升高者结局尤其不佳。

总体而言,这些数据凸显基线炎症标志物的预后价值,有助于识别可能从联合bsAb治疗策略中获益的患者。

展开英文摘要原文

T-cell-redirecting bispecific antibodies (bsAb) offer a novel therapeutic approach for relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (R/R LBCL).

However, predictive biomarkers are needed to identify patients most likely to respond. As both bsAbs and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells represent T-cell-based therapies, we hypothesized that the established CAR-HEMATOTOX (HT) and InflaMix models-reflecting the degree of systemic inflammation-could be of prognostic utility for bsAb therapy.

We applied both scores to a multicenter international cohort of 174 patients with R/R LBCL treated with bsAbs across 15 sites. Patients with a high HT score ( 3, 35%) displayed inferior median progression-free (PFS; 1. 4 vs 7. 4 months; P< . 0001) and overall survival (OS; 2. 0 vs 21. 7 months; P< . 0001) compared with patients with a low HT score. When applying the InflaMix score, 49% of the patients were assigned to the inflammatory cluster, translating into a significantly shorter median PFS (1. 9 vs 17. 8 months; P< . 0001) and OS (4.

1 vs 21. 7 months; P< . 0001). In a multivariable Cox regression analysis accounting for various prognostic factors, HT and InflaMix remained independent adverse risk factors for both PFS and OS. Patients presenting with both elevated HT score and the inflammatory signature showed markedly shorter OS and PFS compared with patients deemed low-risk by either one of the scores. In the CAR-pretreated subcohort, the combination of early CAR T-cell relapse ( 3 months) and elevated inflammation led to particularly detrimental outcomes.

Overall, these data highlight the prognostic utility of baseline inflammatory markers in identifying patients who may benefit from combinatorial strategies alongside bsAb.

论文信息

作者
Magno G、Rejeski K、Rappa G、Stock S、Holzem A、Landwehr M、Seib M、Kutsch N
单位
Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.Germany
文献类型
多中心研究
期刊
Blood advances2026 Mar 10
原文标识
PubMed 41124666 · DOI 10.1182/bloodadvances.2025017766