CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Combining CAR-T therapy with radiotherapy or not in refractory/relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A comparative study.
Combining CAR-T therapy with radiotherapy or not in refractory/relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A comparative study.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
我们的分析表明,BRT 是准备接受 CAR-T 细胞治疗的复发/难治性弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者的一种有效且安全的方法,提示 BRT 可能增强 CAR-T 细胞的抗肿瘤作用。
放疗与嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T疗法可能产生协同作用,提示在CAR-T 治疗中加入放疗或可改善复发/难治性弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(R/R DLBCL)患者预后。然而,CAR-T 治疗前桥接放疗(BRT)尚缺乏标准方案和相关指南。因此,我们回顾性分析接受或未接受CAR-T 前BRT的R/R DLBCL患者结局,评估BRT疗效、安全性及放疗剂量对预后的影响。
2017年12月至2025年1月,80例R/R DLBCL患者接受CAR-T 治疗,其中35例在白细胞单采和淋巴细胞清除期间接受BRT。主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS),次要终点包括总生存期(OS)、疾病特异性生存期(DSS)、照射野内PFS、最佳客观缓解率(ORR)和完全缓解率(CRR)。比较BRT组与未接受BRT组的PFS和OS;在放疗亚组中,比较低与高每次2 Gy等效剂量(EQD2)亚组的PFS、OS及照射野内PFS。
与未接受BRT组相比,BRT组PFS和OS明显更长(P=.001、P=.043)。中位随访35.27个月期间,BRT未增加CAR-T 毒性发生率。与局部BRT亚组相比,综合BRT亚组的PFS(P=.015)和OS(P=.029)更佳,但DSS差异不显著(P=.109)。高EQD2亚组未显著改善PFS(P=.181)或OS(P=.665),局部控制方面也未达到显著性(P=.079);但在肿瘤负荷高的患者中,局部控制有所改善(P=.005)。CAR-T 治疗后达到部分缓解(PR)的患者中,早期挽救性放疗(SRT)与挽救性化疗(SCT)队列的预后无差异。
分析显示,BRT是准备接受CAR-T 治疗的R/R DLBCL患者一种有效且安全的方法,提示BRT可能增强CAR-T 细胞的抗肿瘤作用。
Radiotherapy and Chimeric Antigen Receptor(CAR)-T therapy may exhibit a synergistic effect, suggesting that incorporating radiotherapy into CAR-T could improve the prognosis for patients with refractory/relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DCBCL). A lack of standardized treatment protocols and relevant guidelines in bridging radiotherapy(BRT) prior to CAR-T therapy still exists. Consequently, we retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of R/R DLBCL patients treated with BRT prior to CAR-T therapy or not, aiming to evaluate the efficacy and satety of BRT as well as the impact of radiotherapy dose on prognosis.
Between December 2017 and January 2025, 80 patients diagnosed with R/R DLBCL were treated with CAR-T. Thirty-five of them received BRT during leukapheresis and lymphodepletion. The primary endpoint of this study was progression-free survival(PFS), and secondary endpoints included overall survival(OS), disease-specific survival(DSS), in-field PFS, best objective response rate(ORR), and complete response rate(CRR). PFS and OS of CAR-T were compared between BRT group and no BRT group. In the subgroup of radiotherapy patients, PFS, OS and in-field PFS were compared between the low-Equivalent dose to 2 Gy per fraction(EQD 2 ) subgroup and the high-EQD 2 subgroup.
BRT group showed obviously longer PFS and OS than no BRT group(p = 0.001, p = 0.043). In addition, BRT did not increase the incidence of CAR-T toxicities during follow-up (median:35.27 months). Comprehensive BRT subgroup improved prognosis in PFS(p = 0.015) and OS(p = 0.029) when compared with focal BRT subgroup, no significant effect on DSS was noted(p = 0.109). High-EQD2 subgroup did not significantly improve PFS(p = 0.181) and OS(p = 0.665) except for local control(p = 0.079) especially in patients with high tumor burden(p = 0.005). There is no impact on prognosis between early salvage radiotherapy(SRT) and salvage chemotherapy(SCT) cohorts in patients with PR response to CAR-T therapy.
Our analysis demonstrated that BRT is an effective and safe approach for patients with R/R DLBCL preparing for CAR T-cell therapy, which indicated that BRT may enhance the anti-tumor effect of CAR T-cells.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。