← 返回

CAR-T 细胞治疗临床实践的进展:对医疗资源利用的影响及与自体造血干细胞移植在复发/难治性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者中的比较

英文原题:Advancement of clinical practice in delivering CAR T-cell therapy: impact on healthcare resource utilization and comparison with autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphomas.

查看英文原题

Advancement of clinical practice in delivering CAR T-cell therapy: impact on healthcare resource utilization and comparison with autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphomas.

PubMed 2025/09/06(内容时间) Ann Hematol Q3 · IF 2.3(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

对于一线治疗难治或12个月内复发的复发/难治性大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)患者,嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞二线治疗优于挽救性化疗后进行大剂量化疗和自体造血干细胞移植(ASCT)。CAR-T 细胞疗法纳入常规临床实践,需要一段时间适应并完善临床流程。

我们旨在记录2022和2023年CAR-T 细胞治疗临床流程的演变,并比较常规临床实践中CAR-T 细胞治疗和ASCT流程相关的医疗资源利用(HCRU)。研究使用ClipMed PPM软件进行流程建模,评估接受CAR-T 细胞治疗或ASCT的r/r LBCL患者HCRU;2023年和2022年分别绘制991项和1,174项CAR-T 细胞治疗相关流程,两年合计绘制1,874项ASCT相关流程。改善淋巴清除治疗的实施,以及CAR-T 特异性不良事件的评估和管理,使CAR-T 治疗流程在2022至2023年间住院时间缩短5天(30%),人员总耗时减少15%。CAR-T 细胞疗法的HCRU几乎只有ASCT的一半,其治疗实施人员耗时少77%。CAR-T 治疗住院时间比ASCT短70%–75%(11–13天 vs. 44天)。这些以患者为中心的流程效率提升可减少患者住院时间。了解这一演进过程对于应对先进治疗复杂性、提升患者照护质量和优化资源分配至关重要。

展开英文摘要原文

In patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) who are either refractory to first-line therapy or relapse within 12 months, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is more effective than salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) as second-line therapy. Adoption of CAR T-cell therapy into routine clinical practice involves a period of adaptation and refinement of clinical processes.

We aimed to document the evolution of clinical processes for CAR T-cell therapy during 2022 and 2023, and compare healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) associated with CAR T-cell and ASCT processes in routine clinical practice. ClipMed PPM software-based process modeling was used to assess HCRU for patients with R/R LBCL receiving CAR T-cell or ASCT therapy, mapping 991 and 1174 processes associated with CAR T-cell therapy in 2023 and 2022, respectively, and 1874 processes associated with ASCT over both years.

Improvements in lymphodepletion therapy administration and assessment and management of CAR T-cell therapy-specific adverse events led to a 5-day (30%) reduction in hospitalization and a 15% decrease in total personnel time in the CAR T-cell therapy process from 2022 to 2023. HCRU for CAR T-cell therapy was almost half that of ASCT, with 77% less personnel time for therapy administration.

Hospitalization for CAR T-cell therapy was 70%-75% shorter than for ASCT therapy (11-13 vs. 44 days). These patient-centered process efficiencies provide patients with reduced hospitalization time. Understanding this evolution is vital for addressing complexities of advanced treatments, enhancing patient care quality, and optimizing resource allocation.

论文信息

作者
Fehr M、Naegele M、Greiling M
单位
Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen/HOCH Health Ostschweiz, St. Gallen, Switzerland. Martin.Fehr@h-och.ch.Switzerland
文献类型
对照研究
期刊
Annals of hematology2025 Sep
原文标识
PubMed 40913623 · DOI 10.1007/s00277-025-06564-y