← 返回

Epcoritamab 与 axicabtagene ciloleucel 在适合及未接受过 CAR-T 细胞的复发/难治性弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者中的间接比较

英文原题:Indirect Comparison of Epcoritamab Versus Axicabtagene Ciloleucel in Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell-Eligible and -Naive Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

查看英文原题

Indirect Comparison of Epcoritamab Versus Axicabtagene Ciloleucel in Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell-Eligible and -Naive Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

PubMed 2025/07/31(内容时间) Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk Q1 · IF 4.1(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

该 MAIC 发现 axi-cel 与皮下注射 epcoritamab 的疗效相当,满足了接受三线或更后线治疗的复发/难治性 DLBCL 患者对 CAR-T 替代疗法的关键未满足需求。

中文摘要

目前尚无现货型皮下注射CD3×CD20双特异性抗体epcoritamab与CAR-T 细胞疗法直接对照试验。因此,我们在既往接受过2线全身治疗的复发/难治性弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者中,对epcoritamab与阿基仑赛(axi-cel)的疗效进行了匹配调整间接比较(MAIC)。

MAIC采用EPCORE NHL-1研究中epcoritamab患者个体数据(NCT03625037;数据截止时间为2023年4月)和ZUMA-1研究中axi-cel汇总数据(NCT02348216)。将既往未接受CAR-T 的患者与ZUMA-1人群匹配;采用加权回归模型估算总缓解率(ORR)和完全缓解(CR)率的绝对差异,并使用加权Cox比例风险模型估算无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的风险比(HR)。

EPCORE NHL-1纳入既往未接受CAR-T 的患者86例(61.9%),以及根据ZUMA-1纳入/排除标准选出的符合CAR-T 治疗条件亚组50例(36.0%)。epcoritamab与axi-cel相比,ORR分别为73.5%和74.3%(调整后绝对差异[95% CI]:-0.7% [-18.3,16.8];P=0.933);CR率分别为48.7%和54.5%(调整后绝对差异[95% CI]:-5.7% [-27.1,15.7];P=0.599)。PFS(调整后HR [95% CI]:1.009 [0.572–1.778];P=0.975)和OS(调整后HR [95% CI]:0.826 [0.444–1.536];P=0.546)均无统计学显著差异。符合CAR-T 治疗条件亚组结果相似。

该MAIC显示axi-cel与皮下注射epcoritamab疗效相当,为三线或更后线复发/难治性DLBCL患者提供了CAR-T 疗法之外的替代治疗证据,满足了关键未满足需求。

展开英文摘要原文

In the absence of a head-to-head trial of off-the-shelf subcutaneous epcoritamab, a novel CD3xCD20 bispecific antibody, versus chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR T), a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) of epcoritamab versus axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) efficacy was conducted in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with 2 prior lines of systemic therapy.

The MAIC used epcoritamab patient-level data from EPCORE NHL-1 (NCT03625037; April 2023 data cutoff) and axi-cel aggregated data from ZUMA-1 (NCT02348216). Patients without prior CAR T were matched to the ZUMA-1 population; weighted regression models were used to estimate absolute differences in overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) rate, and weighted Cox proportional-hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

EPCORE NHL-1 included patients without prior CAR T (N = 86, 61.9%) and a CAR T-eligible subset (N = 50, 36.0%) selected via ZUMA-1 inclusion/exclusion criteria. Comparing epcoritamab versus axi-cel, ORR was 73.5% versus 74.3%, respectively (adjusted absolute differences [95% CI]: -0.7% (-18.3, 16.8; P = .933) and CR rate was 48.7% versus 54.5%, respectively (adjusted absolute difference [95% CI] -5.7% [-27.1, 15.7]; P = .599). There was no statistically significant difference in PFS (adjusted HR [95% CI]: 1.009 [0.572-1.778]; P = .975) or OS (adjusted HR [95% CI]: 0.826 [0.444-1.536]; P = .546). Similar results were observed in the CAR T-eligible cohort.

This MAIC found comparative efficacy between axi-cel and subcutaneous epcoritamab, addressing a critical unmet need for therapeutic alternatives to CAR T for patients with third-line or later relapsed/refractory DLBCL.

论文信息

作者
Salles G、Fox CP、Hamadani M、Wang A、Sail K、Alshreef A、Moran M、Mutebi A
单位
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. Electronic address: sallesg@mskcc.org.United States
文献类型
对照研究
期刊
Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia2025 Nov
原文标识
PubMed 40903324 · DOI 10.1016/j.clml.2025.07.015