CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Progressing or Relapsing after Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy.
Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Progressing or Relapsing after Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
CAR-T 治疗后进展或复发的弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)尚无公认标准治疗。尽管理想选择是参加临床试验,但许多患者不符合入组条件。现有多种疗法,疗效各异。为评估异基因造血细胞移植(allo-HCT)、BTK 抑制剂、双特异性抗体、检查点抑制剂、化疗/化学免疫治疗、来那度胺方案、泊洛妥珠单抗方案、放疗及 tafasitamab 或 loncastuximab 方案等疗法治疗 DLBCL 的效果,研究者开展系统综述(SR)和荟萃分析(MA)。纳入标准为:评估上述任一方案治疗 CAR-T 后进展或复发患者的前瞻性或回顾性研究,且至少纳入 10 例患者。研究者于 2024 年 8 月 14 日全面检索 PubMed 和 EMBASE,并采用修订 Newcastle-Ottawa 量表评估纳入研究的方法学质量。
对定义相似的研究(包括治疗对象、研究设计和结局)采用随机效应模型汇总未经转换的比例,并以发生率及相应 95% 置信区间报告结果。初检发现 951 篇文献,其中 24 篇符合纳入标准。allo-HCT、泊洛妥珠单抗方案和双特异性抗体的汇总 ORR 分别为 59%、57% 和 51%。汇总完全缓解率最高的是 allo-HCT(38%),其次为双特异性抗体(33%)和泊洛妥珠单抗方案(29%)。allo-HCT 患者汇总 OS 率最高(59%),部分原因是其汇总复发率较低(27%)。本 SR/MA 汇总 CAR-T 后复发和/或难治性 DLBCL 各种可用疗法疗效(或缺乏疗效)的全部证据,结果显示治疗选择过程复杂,需综合考虑患者体能状态、疾病特征(局限性或全身性)及既往治疗史等因素。
There is no established standard treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) progressing or relapsing after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR T-cell). While enrollment in clinical trials is ideal, unfortunately, many are not eligible to participate. Various treatment modalities exist with different efficacies. To assess the efficacy of various treatment modalities, including allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, bispecifics, checkpoint inhibitors, chemotherapy/chemoimmunotherapy, lenalidomide-based, polatuzumab-based, radiation-based, and tafasitamab or loncastuximab-based therapy for the management of DLBCL, we performed a systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis (MA).
Any prospective or retrospective study assessing the role of any of the above-mentioned treatment regimens in patients with progressing or relapsing after CAR T-cell, enrolling a minimum of 10 patients, was eligible for inclusion. A comprehensive search of PubMed and EMBASE was performed on August 14, 2024. The methodological quality of the included studies was graded using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale.
We pooled untransformed proportions using a random-effects model to pool data from eligible studies with similar definitions relating to treated subjects, design, and outcomes. Results are reported as rates with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Of the 951 references identified in the initial search, 24 met the inclusion criteria. The pooled objective response rates with allo-HCT, polatuzumab-based regimens, and bispecifics were 59%, 57%, and 51%, respectively. The highest pooled complete remission rates were with allo-HCT (38%), followed by bispecifics (33%) and polatuzumab-based regimens (29%).
The pooled overall survival rate was highest with allo-HCT recipients (59%), which is partly explained by the lower pooled relapse rate (27%).
The results from this SR/MA aimed at providing the totality of evidence pertaining to the efficacy (or lack thereof) of various available therapies considered in relapsed and/or refractory DLBCL after CAR T-cell therapy show that treatment choice is a complex process that must consider the patient's performance status and disease-related characteristics, whether localized or systemic, and history of prior therapies, among others.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。