T 细胞衔接疗法的细胞因子释放综合征风险模型

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is an adverse event associated with T-cell engaging (TCE) immuno-oncology therapies such as chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T), bispecific TCE antibodies and dual-affinity retargeting proteins.

To develop a model to predict the preinfusion risk of CRS grade 2 for patients with solid tumors and hematologic malignancies such as acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) treated with TCE bispecific antibodies. STUDY DESIGN: A TCE dataset including clinical trials from 2014 to 2019 evaluating non-CAR-T TCE therapies was sourced from the Medidata Enterprise Data Store, an anonymized data repository from completed clinical trials. The outcome of interest was the first CRS grade 2 occurring within 10 days of TCE therapy. Risk factors for CRS grade 2 were identified from the literature and preliminary data analysis. Features were measured prior to or at the first TCE treatment. Patients were included in the analysis dataset if they had a data element fill rate of >70% for the key features. Features were pruned by assessing multicollinearity across features. Logistic regression and tree-based models were trained. Across 100 iterations with different train-test splits, the average area under the receiver-operator characteristic (AUROC) curve was calculated for each model type.

A total of 715 patients (115 CRS grade 2 and 600 CRS grade <2) were included in the analysis; most patients had ALL (81%) and 19% had solid tumors or NHL. Patients who developed CRS grade 2 had a higher incidence of prior infections (38% versus 28%; P = 0.03) and a higher first dose of TCE therapy (P < 0.001). The best model to predict CRS grade 2 had a mean AUROC of 0.69 (95% confidence interval 0.66-0.72) on the test set. When patients were ranked based on their predicted probability of getting CRS grade 2 and divided into quartiles based on predicted CRS grade 2 risk (very low, low, high, very high), the very high-risk quartile developed CRS grade 2 at 5.9 times the rate (38.10% [interquartile range: 33.33-43.54]) compared to the very-low risk quartile (6.45% [3.44-8.82]; the sample average was 12.96% [9.25-24.07]). Compared to patients with very low CRS grade 2 risk, patients with very high CRS grade 2 risk had ALL as a disease type (99% versus 67%, P < 0.001), received a higher TCE dose (1.00 versus 0.61, P < 0.001), had a higher rate of prior infections (49% versus 12%, P < 0.001) and a higher serum creatinine (0.60 versus 0.32, P < 0.001).

Using the CRS grade 2 risk model, it was possible to stratify patients by risk categories. CRS grade 2 risk stratification may facilitate patient selection for TCE therapy and tailored pretreatment and monitoring of CRS to maximize treatment efficacy and safety.