CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Routine prophylaxis with levetiracetam offers no benefit in CD19 CAR-T for LBCL: a multicenter propensity-matched study.
Routine prophylaxis with levetiracetam offers no benefit in CD19 CAR-T for LBCL: a multicenter propensity-matched study.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
本研究旨在评估左乙拉西坦(LVT)预防性用药对接受抗CD19CAR-T 细胞治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)患者中免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)发生率及严重程度的影响。研究分析了254例经倾向性评分匹配的队列患者,按1:1比例比较接受LVT预防性用药(LVT-yes)与未接受LVT预防性用药(LVT-no)的患者。
结果显示,两组在任何级别ICANS的发生率上均无显著差异(LVT-no组为32.3%,LVT-yes组为37.1%;P = .29),在严重ICANS方面亦无显著差异(2-4级,15.1% vs 16.1% [P = .80];3-4级,7.9% vs 9.7% [P = .71])。LVT的使用与早期免疫效应细胞相关血液毒性(ICAHT)发生率升高相关,LVT-no组和LVT-yes组中2至4级ICAHT的发生率分别为37.3%和63.9%(P < .001)。两组的总生存期和无进展生存期无显著差异(P = .337和.670)。非复发死亡率相当(P = .77)。这些发现表明,在CAR-T 治疗中常规使用LVT预防ICANS并无效果,需要进一步研究以明确其在特定人群或ICANS治疗后的作用。
This study aims to evaluate the impact of levetiracetam (LVT) prophylaxis on the incidence and severity of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) in patients undergoing anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy for LBCL (large B-cell lymphoma). A propensity score-matched cohort of 254 patients was analyzed, comparing those receiving LVT prophylaxis (LTV-yes) with those not receiving it (LTV-no), in a 1:1 ratio.
The results showed no significant difference in the occurrence of ICANS of any grade between the 2 groups (32. 3% in LVT-no vs 37. 1% in LVT-yes; P = . 29), or in severe ICANS (grades 2-4, 15. 1% vs 16. 1% [P = . 80]; grade 3-4, 7. 9% vs 9. 7% [P = . 71]). The use of LVT was associated with a higher incidence of early immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity (ICAHT), with grade 2 to 4 ICAHT occurring in 37. 3% vs 63. 9% (P < . 001) of patients in the LVT-no and LVT-yes groups, respectively.
Overall survival and progression-free survival did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (P = . 337 and . 670). Nonrelapse mortality rates were comparable (P = . 77).
These findings suggest that routine use of LVT as prophylaxis for ICANS in CAR-T therapy is not effective, and further research is needed to refine its role in selected populations or after ICANS treatment.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。