← 返回

左乙拉西坦常规预防在大 B 细胞淋巴瘤 CD19 CAR-T 治疗中无获益:一项多中心倾向性匹配研究

英文原题:Routine prophylaxis with levetiracetam offers no benefit in CD19 CAR-T for LBCL: a multicenter propensity-matched study.

查看英文原题

Routine prophylaxis with levetiracetam offers no benefit in CD19 CAR-T for LBCL: a multicenter propensity-matched study.

PubMed 2025/11/11(内容时间) Blood Adv Q1 · IF 7.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

本研究旨在评估左乙拉西坦(LVT)预防性用药对接受抗CD19CAR-T 细胞治疗的大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)患者中免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)发生率及严重程度的影响。研究分析了254例经倾向性评分匹配的队列患者,按1:1比例比较接受LVT预防性用药(LVT-yes)与未接受LVT预防性用药(LVT-no)的患者。

结果显示,两组在任何级别ICANS的发生率上均无显著差异(LVT-no组为32.3%,LVT-yes组为37.1%;P = .29),在严重ICANS方面亦无显著差异(2-4级,15.1% vs 16.1% [P = .80];3-4级,7.9% vs 9.7% [P = .71])。LVT的使用与早期免疫效应细胞相关血液毒性(ICAHT)发生率升高相关,LVT-no组和LVT-yes组中2至4级ICAHT的发生率分别为37.3%和63.9%(P < .001)。两组的总生存期和无进展生存期无显著差异(P = .337和.670)。非复发死亡率相当(P = .77)。这些发现表明,在CAR-T 治疗中常规使用LVT预防ICANS并无效果,需要进一步研究以明确其在特定人群或ICANS治疗后的作用。

展开英文摘要原文

This study aims to evaluate the impact of levetiracetam (LVT) prophylaxis on the incidence and severity of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) in patients undergoing anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy for LBCL (large B-cell lymphoma). A propensity score-matched cohort of 254 patients was analyzed, comparing those receiving LVT prophylaxis (LTV-yes) with those not receiving it (LTV-no), in a 1:1 ratio.

The results showed no significant difference in the occurrence of ICANS of any grade between the 2 groups (32. 3% in LVT-no vs 37. 1% in LVT-yes; P = . 29), or in severe ICANS (grades 2-4, 15. 1% vs 16. 1% [P = . 80]; grade 3-4, 7. 9% vs 9. 7% [P = . 71]). The use of LVT was associated with a higher incidence of early immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity (ICAHT), with grade 2 to 4 ICAHT occurring in 37. 3% vs 63. 9% (P < . 001) of patients in the LVT-no and LVT-yes groups, respectively.

Overall survival and progression-free survival did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (P = . 337 and . 670). Nonrelapse mortality rates were comparable (P = . 77).

These findings suggest that routine use of LVT as prophylaxis for ICANS in CAR-T therapy is not effective, and further research is needed to refine its role in selected populations or after ICANS treatment.

论文信息

作者
Galli E、Di Blasi R、Di Rocco A、Cristinelli C、Pansini I、Bommier C、Corrente A、De Bernardis I
第一作者单位
Dipartimento di Scienze di Laboratorio ed Ematologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.Italy
通讯作者单位
Service H&#xe9;mato-Oncologie, H&#xf4;pital Saint-Louis, Assistance Publique-H&#xf4;pitaux de Paris, Paris, France.France
文献类型
多中心研究
期刊
Blood advances2025 Nov 11
原文标识
PubMed 40779573 · DOI 10.1182/bloodadvances.2025017378