← 返回

高级别 B 细胞淋巴瘤与 DLBCL 中 CAR-T 细胞疗法结局:一项加权比较分析

英文原题:Outcomes of CAR T-cell therapy in high-grade B-cell lymphomas compared to DLBCL: a weighted comparison analysis.

查看英文原题

Outcomes of CAR T-cell therapy in high-grade B-cell lymphomas compared to DLBCL: a weighted comparison analysis.

PubMed 2025/12/23(内容时间) Blood Adv Q1 · IF 7.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

高级别B细胞淋巴瘤(HGBL,包括双打击/三打击[HGBL-DH/TH]以及非特指型HGBL)在一线治疗失败后预后较差。针对三线侵袭性大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)的抗CD19嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞治疗使40%的患者获得长期缓解。

本研究评估了与弥漫性LBCL(DLBCL)相比,可预测HGBL结局的因素。我们使用加权log-rank检验和加权Cox模型评估了亚型(HGBL vs DLBCL)的预测价值,以及CAR-T 细胞治疗失败后的总生存期(OS)。前瞻性研究队列包括432例患者(HGBL,n = 78;DLBCL,n = 354),HGBL中位随访时间为22.8个月,DLBCL为18个月。有趣的是,HGBL-DH/TH淋巴瘤患者与其他高级别组织学类型患者之间的无进展生存期和OS无统计学显著差异。HGBL中CAR-T 细胞治疗扩增与缓解不相关。加权前,HGBL与DLBCL之间的OS存在显著差异(24个月OS:37% vs 49%,P = .0036)。

加权后,2年OS差异仍然显著(37% vs 44%,P = .0343),且与CAR-T 细胞治疗失败后较差的生存相关。HGBL和DLBCL患者的2年非复发死亡率和第二恶性肿瘤发生率相似(11% vs 11%,P = .830;6.4% vs 11.4%,P = .844)。在CAR-T 细胞治疗失败的患者中,转化型DLBCL失败后1年OS显著高于原发DLBCL和HGBL(59% vs 32% vs 11%,<0.0004)。较早使用CAR-T 细胞治疗可能改善HGBL的结局。该试验在www.ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号为#NCT06339255。

展开英文摘要原文

High-grade B-cell lymphomas (HGBL, including double-hit/triple-hit [HGBL-DH/TH], and HGBL not otherwise specified) have a poor prognosis upon failure of first-line therapy. Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for third-line aggressive large B-cell lymphomas (LBCL) resulted in long-term remission in 40% of patients.

This study evaluated factors that can predict outcomes in HGBL compared to diffuse LBCL (DLBCL).

We assessed the predictive value of the subtype (HGBL vs DLBCL) using weighted log-rank tests and weighted Cox models, and overall survival (OS) following CAR T-cell therapy failure. The prospective study cohort comprised 432 patients (HGBL, n = 78; DLBCL, n = 354), median follow-up of 22. 8 months for HGBL and 18 months for DLBCL. Interestingly, there was no statistically significant difference in progression-free survival and OS between patients with HGBL-DH/TH lymphomas vs other high-grade histotypes. CAR T-cell therapy expansion in HGBL did not correlate with response. Before weighting, a significant difference in OS was observed between HGBL vs DLBCL (24-month OS: 37% vs 49%, P = .

0036). After weighting, the difference in 2-year OS remained significant (37% vs 44%, P = . 0343), and it was related to inferior survival following CAR T-cell therapy failure. The 2-year nonrelapse mortality and incidence of secondary malignancies were similar in patients with HGBL and DLBCL (11% vs 11%, P = . 830; 6. 4% vs 11.

4%, P = . 844). Among patients in whom CAR T-cell therapy failed, the 1-year OS after failure was significantly higher in transformed than de novo DLBCL and HGBL (59% vs 32% vs 11%, <0. 0004). Earlier use of CAR T-cell therapy may improve the outcome of HGBL. This trial was registered at www. clinicaltrials. gov as #NCT06339255.

论文信息

作者
Dodero A、Ceparano G、Casadei B、Angelillo P、Bramanti S、Tisi MC、Ljevar S、Stella F
单位
Division of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.Italy
文献类型
对照研究 · 观察性研究
期刊
Blood advances2025 Dec 23
原文标识
PubMed 40763273 · DOI 10.1182/bloodadvances.2025016117