CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Outcomes of CAR T-cell therapy in high-grade B-cell lymphomas compared to DLBCL: a weighted comparison analysis.
Outcomes of CAR T-cell therapy in high-grade B-cell lymphomas compared to DLBCL: a weighted comparison analysis.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
高级别B细胞淋巴瘤(HGBL,包括双打击/三打击[HGBL-DH/TH]以及非特指型HGBL)在一线治疗失败后预后较差。针对三线侵袭性大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)的抗CD19嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞治疗使40%的患者获得长期缓解。
本研究评估了与弥漫性LBCL(DLBCL)相比,可预测HGBL结局的因素。我们使用加权log-rank检验和加权Cox模型评估了亚型(HGBL vs DLBCL)的预测价值,以及CAR-T 细胞治疗失败后的总生存期(OS)。前瞻性研究队列包括432例患者(HGBL,n = 78;DLBCL,n = 354),HGBL中位随访时间为22.8个月,DLBCL为18个月。有趣的是,HGBL-DH/TH淋巴瘤患者与其他高级别组织学类型患者之间的无进展生存期和OS无统计学显著差异。HGBL中CAR-T 细胞治疗扩增与缓解不相关。加权前,HGBL与DLBCL之间的OS存在显著差异(24个月OS:37% vs 49%,P = .0036)。
加权后,2年OS差异仍然显著(37% vs 44%,P = .0343),且与CAR-T 细胞治疗失败后较差的生存相关。HGBL和DLBCL患者的2年非复发死亡率和第二恶性肿瘤发生率相似(11% vs 11%,P = .830;6.4% vs 11.4%,P = .844)。在CAR-T 细胞治疗失败的患者中,转化型DLBCL失败后1年OS显著高于原发DLBCL和HGBL(59% vs 32% vs 11%,<0.0004)。较早使用CAR-T 细胞治疗可能改善HGBL的结局。该试验在www.ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号为#NCT06339255。
High-grade B-cell lymphomas (HGBL, including double-hit/triple-hit [HGBL-DH/TH], and HGBL not otherwise specified) have a poor prognosis upon failure of first-line therapy. Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for third-line aggressive large B-cell lymphomas (LBCL) resulted in long-term remission in 40% of patients.
This study evaluated factors that can predict outcomes in HGBL compared to diffuse LBCL (DLBCL).
We assessed the predictive value of the subtype (HGBL vs DLBCL) using weighted log-rank tests and weighted Cox models, and overall survival (OS) following CAR T-cell therapy failure. The prospective study cohort comprised 432 patients (HGBL, n = 78; DLBCL, n = 354), median follow-up of 22. 8 months for HGBL and 18 months for DLBCL. Interestingly, there was no statistically significant difference in progression-free survival and OS between patients with HGBL-DH/TH lymphomas vs other high-grade histotypes. CAR T-cell therapy expansion in HGBL did not correlate with response. Before weighting, a significant difference in OS was observed between HGBL vs DLBCL (24-month OS: 37% vs 49%, P = .
0036). After weighting, the difference in 2-year OS remained significant (37% vs 44%, P = . 0343), and it was related to inferior survival following CAR T-cell therapy failure. The 2-year nonrelapse mortality and incidence of secondary malignancies were similar in patients with HGBL and DLBCL (11% vs 11%, P = . 830; 6. 4% vs 11.
4%, P = . 844). Among patients in whom CAR T-cell therapy failed, the 1-year OS after failure was significantly higher in transformed than de novo DLBCL and HGBL (59% vs 32% vs 11%, <0. 0004). Earlier use of CAR T-cell therapy may improve the outcome of HGBL. This trial was registered at www. clinicaltrials. gov as #NCT06339255.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。