← 返回

Belantamab 暴露后复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤序贯 BCMA 靶向治疗的真实世界结局

英文原题:Real-World Outcomes of Sequential BCMA-directed therapies in Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma After Belantamab Exposure.

查看英文原题

Real-World Outcomes of Sequential BCMA-directed therapies in Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma After Belantamab Exposure.

PubMed 2025/06/23(内容时间) Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk Q1 · IF 4.1(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

对于 belantamab 治疗后进展的 RRMM 患者,接受 BCMA 靶向 BsAb 或 CAR-T 治疗仍然可行。然而,与既往未接触过 BCMA 的患者相比,结局仍然较差,且不受治疗选择或距上次 BCMA 暴露时间的影响。

研究思路结论见上方概要

尽管针对B细胞成熟抗原(BCMA)的疗法在多发性骨髓瘤中的应用日益增多,但序贯使用BCMA靶向疗法的结局仍是一个活跃的研究领域。

在这项多中心回顾性分析中,我们评估了在抗体药物偶联物belantamab mafodotin治疗后进展的患者接受BCMA靶向治疗(包括CAR-T 和双特异性抗体(BsAb))的真实世界结局。共有23例患者(14例CAR-T,9例BsAb)纳入分析。

患者中位年龄为68岁(范围37-82),43%具有高危细胞遗传学,87%既往接受过4线治疗,35%在治疗时伴有髓外病变。整个人群的总体缓解率(ORR)为65%,BsAb亚组为44%,CAR-T 亚组为79%。中位随访24个月时,中位无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)分别为5个月(范围2-10)和28个月(范围16-NR)。接受BsAb与CAR-T 的患者之间中位PFS无差异(p=0.8),或基于从belantamab至BCMA治疗的时间(<6个月 vs 6个月,p=0.8)亦无差异。

展开英文摘要原文

While B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) directed therapies are increasingly utilized for multiple myeloma, outcomes with sequential treatments with BCMA-directed therapies remain an area of active investigation.

In this multicenter retrospective analysis, we evaluated the real-world outcomes of patients treated with BCMA-directed therapies including CAR T and bispecific antibody (BsAb) following progression on the antibody-drug conjugate belantamab mafodotin. A total of 23 patients (14 CAR T, 9 BsAb) were included in the analysis.

The median patient age was 68 (range 37-82) years, with 43% having high-risk cytogenetics, 87% having received 4 prior lines of therapy, and 35% with extramedullary disease at the time of treatment. The overall response rate (ORR) for the entire population was 65%, 44% in the BsAb and 79% in the CAR T subgroup. With a median follow-up of 24 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5 (range 2-10) months and 28 (range 16-NR) months, respectively. There was no difference in median PFS between patients who received a BsAb vs CAR T (p=0.8), or based on time from belantamab to BCMA therapy (<6 months vs 6 months, p=0.8).

Treatment with BCMA-directed BsAb or CAR T remains feasible for RRMM patients after progression on belantamab. However, outcomes remain inferior compared to those without prior BCMA exposure and were not affected by choice of therapy or time since last BCMA exposure.

论文信息

作者
Mewawalla P、Dileo R、Yin Y、Strouse C、Shaikh H、Davis JA、Alkharabsheh O、Rashid A
第一作者单位
Division of Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA.United States
通讯作者单位
Department of Hematology-Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; Myeloma &amp; Cell Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY. Electronic address: hashmih1@mskcc.org.
文献类型
多中心研究
期刊
Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia2025 Dec
原文标识
PubMed 40681433 · DOI 10.1016/j.clml.2025.06.015